{"id":19305,"date":"2016-04-18T01:30:08","date_gmt":"2016-04-18T00:30:08","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.diaryofanadi.co.uk\/?p=19305"},"modified":"2023-04-12T14:01:52","modified_gmt":"2023-04-12T13:01:52","slug":"drone-hits-ba-plane","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/diaryofanadi.co.uk\/?p=19305","title":{"rendered":"Drone Hits BA Plane"},"content":{"rendered":"\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n\n\n\n

I saw this story on the BBC website<\/a>. Apparently, a BA Airbus A320 flying to London from Geneva collided with what was believed to be a drone as it was coming in to land.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Apparently, it is the first such collision, though there have been numerous close calls.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u2026pilots have also called for the DoT to fund tests into what would happen if a drone got sucked into an engine or crashed into a plane’s windscreen.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

I\u2019m not quite sure what they think this will prove. All I do know is that if I was on a plane, I would much rather it landed without incident instead of having one of these things get sucked into the turbines. You don\u2019t need to be a rocket scientist \u2013 or an aviation expert \u2013 to realise that the risk of a catastrophic incident goes up, not down, if something gets pulled into an engine, and quite frankly I wouldn\u2019t give a damn about the results of such tests.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

One thing that is clear is that people who operate drones are predominately twats. It\u2019s already illegal to fly them near airports, with up to five years in jail being up for grabs, and yet between September and November 2015 there were six reported near misses in the UK near London airports alone. Leeds and Bradford airports have also had near misses, though this is less of a surprise when you consider the general mentality of people who live near those. There were another six incidents recorded<\/a> in the 12 months up to July 2015. It\u2019s anyone\u2019s guess how many go unreported.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Drones have the potential to be great fun to play with \u2013 I have been tempted to get one myself \u2013 but the rules surrounding them are understandably restrictive. Apart from what they could do to a jet engine, there are also the documented effects of what they do to people<\/a> if they hit them. Consequently, if your desire for fun knows no bounds then you have to break the Law. And that\u2019s when you start to understand why Leeds, Bradford, and London have such a problem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

It\u2019s ironic that for something which hasn\u2019t yet been banned, you can\u2019t fly them far away from you (where they might hit planes), you can\u2019t fly them near large groups of people (where they might injure them), and obviously flying them close to you puts you and anyone near you in danger. So, pretty much anywhere – which significantly detracts from their “fun” value.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Drones are not toys. Unfortunately, apart from professional operators, the people who use them use them EXACTLY as toys. It\u2019s what I\u2019d do if I had one \u2013 I have no actual need<\/strong> for one – which is the precise reason why I haven\u2019t bothered to get one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n