Category - ADI

DSA Advice: Driving In Wet Weather

Timely advice from the DSA about wet-weather driving:

Rule 227

In wet weather, stopping distances (PDF, 125KB) will be at least double those required for stopping on dry roads. This is because your tyres have less grip on the road.

In wet weather

  • you should keep well back from the vehicle in front. This will increase your ability to see and plan ahead
  • if the steering becomes unresponsive, it probably means that water is preventing the tyres from gripping the road. Ease off the accelerator and slow down gradually
  • the rain and spray from vehicles may make it difficult to see and be seen
  • be aware of the dangers of spilt diesel that will make the surface very slippery
  • take extra care around pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders

Rule 121

Brakes affected by water. If you have driven through deep water your brakes may be less effective.

Test them at the first safe opportunity by pushing gently on the brake pedal to make sure that they work. If they are not fully effective, gently apply light pressure while driving slowly. This will help to dry them out.

With all the rain we’ve had, people really need to take notice of this advice.

DSA Advice: Motorways

An email alert from the DSA advising on driving on motorways:

Rule 264

You should always drive in the left-hand lane when the road ahead is clear.

If you are overtaking a number of slower-moving vehicles, you should return to the left-hand lane as soon as you are safely past.

Slow-moving or speed-restricted vehicles should always remain in the left-hand lane of the carriageway unless overtaking.

You MUST NOT drive on the hard shoulder except in an emergency or if directed to do so by the police, Highways Agency traffic officers in uniform or by signs.

See all motorway rules here.

Deep Philosophy

Homer - The ScreamI was on a lesson with a pupil today who has her test coming up in a month or so. She’s a good driver, but the way her head works is her biggest obstacle. Roundabouts bring the problem right to the fore, but it isn’t just those – it can happen at junctions, crossings, anywhere.

She knows exactly what to do, but when she comes to negotiate them (sometimes) her mind just seems to freeze. Once something has gone wrong, until we can stop and effectively reset the counter then a whole cascade of other things can also go wrong. Today she came off a roundabout, immediately missed a pedestrian about to step on to a crossing, missed the next roundabout, and then missed the cars coming towards her on it (after I’d intervened). Obviously this is no good if she is going to be driving on her own at some stage, and I’m dealing with it.

But that’s not the point of this story.

After we pulled over to “reset the counter”, she told me that her dad had once told her that she was capable of seeing a path with people walking on it, but only she would be stupid enough to ignore the glaring evidence and go a different way. (I know her, and this was her dad talking to her in a fatherly way about her problem, which manifests itself in all parts of her life).

Her dad ended his lesson with this brilliant one-liner:

There’s the path. Take it.

There’s a lot of truth in those five words in the right circumstances. I plan to use them a lot!

You see, a lot of learners make the same mistake and try to conjure up complex answers to simple questions or decisions, so the choice between left or right becomes confused with other options which only they can see.

I’ve lost count of the number of pupils over the years who have tried to go, say, “straight ahead” when there is no “straight ahead”. Or who don’t move out on roundabouts for their exits because they “thought it was the next one”. And my favourite reason for not taking “the next turn on the left” (complete with me pointing and referring to the sign), that they thought I “meant another one further on”.

Driving is much simpler than that – especially on driving lessons and the driving test.

Can A Driving Instructor Be Over The Limit?

That’s right. Someone found the blog on that search term.

Yes. They can be over the drink drive limit for blood alcohol. Same as everyone else.

As much as I’m sure many ADIs would like to think – and as much as their behaviour sometimes would suggest – otherwise, driving instructors do only have the same number of chromosomes as normal human beings.

Attracting Pupils

I’ve had a few hits over the last few days on the search term “adi how to attract pupil” (sic) and “lack of work for adis” (or similar phrases). I also noticed a topic on a forum where a newly qualified ADI was asking how to get pupils – after 3 months of being an ADI they had none whatsoever!

The whole situation is really quite simple to summarise. As an ADI you are offering a service, and there are people out there who are prepared to pay for that service. None of those people knows you exist – and even if they do, there are hundreds or thousands of other ADIs also trying to sign them up.

People will not wander the streets trying to find you. You’ve got to find them. So the first thing you have to do is let everyone Advertising for Dummiesknow you’re there, and that means advertising. This can be anything from a handwritten scrap of paper stuck in the window of the local newsagents to full-blown colour ads in local or national papers and magazines. You can deliver flyers door-to-door, hang out near schools and universities (that could get you arrested, so be careful), or any number of other things. One driving school in my area even pays for huge billboard advertisements in at least three locations. Obviously, the cost of advertising ranges from a few pennies a week up to thousands of pounds.

Oh, and you don’t just have to do it once. You have to keep on reminding people you’re there somehow, so advertising can never really stop.

Now it gets controversial. If your advertising campaigns are successfully informing people of your existence, you’ve still got to give them something that stands out from everyone else’s offers. It’s like a fish nibbling at the bait on your hook – whether you catch it or not depends on the bait.

In an ideal world – one not populated by idiots – all instructors would be charging similar prices, so prospective pupils would really only be looking for the best instructors (or the ones that said they were the best, anyway). Unfortunately, the real world contains a lot of morons with no business sense (many of whom aren’t proven as good instructors yet, and many of whom are proven to be average instructors at best), and they’ve started a trend whereby the bait involves stupidly low lesson prices and sometimes even stupider offers. Many of these cheapo instructors will be charging as little as half of what they could be, and the problem is worse in the more deprived areas.

In theory, as you gain more experience as an ADI (and more passes to your name), your reputation will grow and – if you believe some people – eager pupils will be queuing outside your house permanently waiting for the next available vacancy on your 2-year waiting list. By this time you’ll only be working one or two hours a week anyway, in between your other work of saving whole countries from natural disasters and your tireless efforts on behalf of the pandas and other endangered species.

In reality, your reputation will get you some new pupils… sometimes. But it absolutely will not get you new pupils all the time. Periodically you’ll have a good spell, where one pupil maybe creates a chain reaction which brings in a dozen more friends and family. But more often than not pupils are effectively dead ends – all their friends are already taking lessons or have passed, or they’re older and don’t kMoney down the drainnow anyone who wants to learn. No matter what some people claim, that’s how it will be for the vast majority of ADIs, especially newer ones.

Remember that if you’re a half-decent ADI, virtually every pupil you teach will think you’re “the best” – and those being taught by others will think exactly the same about their instructor. That is about as far as the reputation card goes.

There is an exception to this, and it is based on racial and cultural issues. For example, many Asian communities are very insular, and if you’re an Asian instructor specialising in Asian pupils then your referrals are likely to be more numerous. A female Muslim instructor specialising in teaching Muslim females is also potentially on to a winner. And the same seems to be true (to a lesser extent) for Polish and other minority groups where language is a barrier. Polish-speaking instructors can easily clean up in areas with high Polish populations.

None of these examples mean that you could automatically do the same if you were Asian or Polish. If other people are already doing it, it isn’t a new idea and it might end up being overworked – but if no one has caught on to the idea in your area… well. These examples just illustrate the importance of finding a relatively unique selling point (USP) or tapping a relatively untapped market. Cheapo lesson prices are no longer “relatively” anything, and they’re certainly not unique.

Back to the subject of advertising, you can spend a lot of money on it and not get a penny in return. As I said, all the other ADIs are also doing it so you’re just another drop in the ocean. This seems to prompt many desperate instructors to drop their prices even further, or to make ever more ridiculous offers, but the irony is that it isn’t that people aren’t interested in the previous offers – they just can’t seen them through the glare of all the others! Cheapo offers have had their day – they’re not unique enough to make you stand out anymore!

A few years ago I tried various forms of advertising as an experiment. For £600 I had a small advert in Yellow Pages for 18 months. In all that time I had ONE enquiry, and I strongly suspect even that was from YP staff after I’d told them I wasn’t going to re-advertise because it hadn’t worked. I also spent £120 on an ad in a free local newspaper over 3 months (guaranteed circulation of over 10,000 every month). I had no enquiries whatsoever from that. I’ve tried various other methods which have not shown an acceptable return on investment (ROI), either. Of course, I accept that advertising can work (some forms have for me), and that others might have more success than I did with the examples I mentioned, but it can’t possibly work for Inner city estates and recessioneveryone and especially not these days with so many ADIs all vying for work in the middle of a recession. Common sense tells you that.

Once you’re established – and if you don’t get a bad reputation along the way – the work is definitely there (it is for me). I’m effectively winning work away from all those newer instructors, and I often (and I mean very often) pick up pupils who have tried the cheaper option and found it wanting. That pushes things even further in my favour. Low prices might be the main thing that some learners look for, but an increasing number are quickly waking up to the realisation that they are being taken for a ride. That’s when I get hold of them.

Of course, if you’re happy not making a profit then you can specialise in teaching people who don’t have enough money to pay for proper lessons. There’s obviously a big market for such lessons, especially in these austere times, and if you can close your mind to the fact that if they pass they probably won’t be able to afford insurance and road tax either, but will possibly still drive, you may get a full diary out of it. But with lack of money also comes unreliability. I know from experience that if someone is struggling to afford lessons then they are highly likely to cancel lessons at short notice or not take them regularly. And of course, you’d need at least twice as many of these – so twice as much work on your part – to achieve the same income that an ADI charging normal prices would. You’ve got to be desperate or stupid to deliberately go down this route.

Before you start training to become an ADI – before you start trading, anyway – you need to do some serious calculating and work out just what it is you want to be. Do you want a new car or a banger? Will it be professionally sign-written or will it just have L plates on it and nothing else? Do you want to work full time or are you only going to cover nine to five weekdays (avoiding school runs and school holidays)? Are you aiming high or low? Is it going to be your main wage, of are you doing it for some pocket-money? Is it to show that you are independent or not stuck at home with the kids, so there will always be someone to support you with their huge main household wage?

And if you’re newly-qualified, the biggest question of all, and the one a huge number of people ignore or get wrong…

ARE YOU GOING SOLO OR WITH A FRANCHISE?

The vast majority of those thinking of becoming ADIs see one thing, and one thing only: an hourly income of £20-£25! They think “40 hours at £25 an hour?  That’s £1,000 a week???” and they long for the day when they pass Part 3 and start packing that kind of money into their pockets. It’s also worth pointing out that many, if not most, people become ADIs because they need a job, and aren’t just doing this for a bit of fun. They consider the franchise option and conclude (often as a result of biased and misleading advice from “experts” on the web) that if they go solo all that money will be theirs. This is utter rubbish!

The reality is often exactly what the person I mentioned above has found. Three months in, and no work whatsoever. By going solo and dreaming of packing away £1,000 a week, they may as well plan to win the lottery or strike gold in their suburban gardens as business models instead. They’re all just as attainable.

It costs money just to be an ADI, even with no work. It is likely to be costing £100 or more a week just for the car. Fuel is extra (I spend £250 a week on fuel sometimes). The aforementioned advertising could easily set you back several hundred pounds in the short-term. And on top of that, you’ve got the cost of all your training and business set up to factor in. If you remain non-working for long you are quickly going to go out of business unless the main wage earner in the house is bankrolling you behind the scenes, and most people won’t have that luxury. The simple fact is that trying to get up-and-running on your own, with no financial backup, and a one-chance-only shot at avoiding bankruptcy is an absolutely stupid way forward for most new ADIs. Unfortunately, greed easily overwhelms common sense, and that £1,000 a week remains the Holy Grail.

Much of the “expert advice” to go solo right from the start comes from people who themselves started on a franchise and only went independent sometime later after they’d established themselves. They seem completely unable to link facts and real outcomes without adding their own prejudices into the equation and end up providing dangerously misleading “advice”. In other cases, these “experts” began their ADI careers in a galaxy far, far away… in a time and place far removed from the 2011/2012 recession. If nothing else, there are gazillions more ADIs around now than there were when they started, that’s for sure. Their “advice” is bound to be flawed if it doesn’t take into account the current situation, and unless you understand that situation you can’t advise on it!

The usual argument goes that a franchiser charging £100-£200 a week for a car and a supply of pupils is a crime akin to murder or arson! The people who spout this nonsense would happily advise you to go bankrupt… sorry, I mean go solo and not have any pupils to teach… rather than pay a franchise company a penny. Their hatred is usually aimed at Red, the AA, or BSM, but this is rarely stated directly and anyone looking in is left with the “advice” that all franchises are bad and should be avoided.

But the logic is simple. Do you want to be solo, with the very real risk of no work, no prospect of work (or impossibly slow growth), and mounting bills for failed advertising and car leases? Or do you want some help to get started?

You’ll already paying at least £100 for the car if you go solo, so an extra £50-£100 for a deal with a car and pupils is not that much more. Even if the franchise only gets you a handful of pupils, that’s a hell of a lot better than no work at all. It is enough to pay some bills, and it sets you on the road to growing your business and reputation. You need your head examining if you think that staying solo and totally redundant is the better option, just because someone who doesn’t like franchises told you it was. And this is even more true if you’re one of the growing number of people who simply don’t have a clue about  any business matters, let alone those pertaining to being an ADI.

If you are struggling for work, consider a franchise.

Choose one which doesn’t have a minimum term contract, notice period, or stupid clause about not working within a 50 mile radius if you leave them.

Despatch: June 2012

The latest edition of Despatch is available for viewing now.

It covers driving tests during the Olympics, comments about the CGI HPT clips, news about the new Highway Code app, some check test advice, and a few bits and pieces.

Horse Riders

Someone passed me this link to a discussion forum thread on Horse & Hound (EDIT: I note that it has been picked up by a driving forum, too). I’ve linked to Horse & Hound before, as they had a very useful story about the dangers of taking pupils’ kids out on lessons (I am totally against the practice, and that story illustrates why).

This particular thread concerns a horse rider who has commented that a learner driver passed them on a blind bend, and wouldn’t have been able to deal with a car coming the other way. It’s a fair and relevant comment. However, especially in view of the subsequent replies, I want to comment on the author’s original claims.

The original poster says (all spelling and grammar left intact):

very rare we have to encounter roads but when we do we are as polite as possible and in hi viz… but just a thought as so many fatalities with horses recently etc… when i passed my test many moons ago we were taught to pass slowly and only when safe, this lady has been told to pass on blind bend etc…we all have our woes on the road but just curious as to wether the rise in horse accidents isnt just because there are more cars on road but partly because learner drivers are not informed when encountering riders etc ???

First of all, it might be “very rare” for the author to encounter roads, but it is standard daily practice for horse riders at various stables near me to ride out on the roads (and I suspect this is true of the majority of riders). They have to, and there’s nothing wrong with that. Sometimes, these “roads” are 50mph and 60mph ‘A’ roads with roundabouts on them! However, not all riders wear hi-visibility jackets – those who do are the exception rather than the rule – nor do all of them ride in single file on narrow rural roads as they should do (though I must add that most do).

Next, not all riders are as “polite as possible” (again, I will add that most are). Those riding racehorses (we have a racing stable not far away) or other magnificent animals seem to be the most ignorant, though the practice of not acknowledging drivers who slow down and pass carefully seems to be growing – I’ve noticed that it is becoming especially evident among the younger female riders these days (in the past, they have been friendly and polite).

The rider who posted those comments assumes that the learner in question was actually told to drive incorrectly. They assume that the supervising driver had sanctioned it – both before and after the event. The author then suggests that “the rise in horse accidents” is down to all learner drivers not being taught to drive properly. This is simply not true.

Horse riders have rules of their own they’re supposed to follow in the HC. As I’ve said, not all of them wear hi-viz gear or stay single-file on narrow roads, and I can add that not all of them use hand signals properly or at all. Around here, for example, it is not uncommon for them to wave following traffic through on blind bends when they can see it’s clear – they’re only being helpful, of course, but the rules about beckoning others apply to all road users, not just cars.

The bottom line is that no one is perfect – not even horse riders.

The Highway Code (HC) says regarding drivers and horses:

215

Horse riders and horse-drawn vehicles. Be particularly careful of horse riders and horse-drawn vehicles especially when overtaking. Always pass wide and slowly. Horse riders are often children, so take extra care and remember riders may ride in double file when escorting a young or inexperienced horse or rider. Look out for horse riders’ and horse drivers’ signals and heed a request to slow down or stop. Take great care and treat all horses as a potential hazard; they can be unpredictable, despite the efforts of their rider/driver.

It’s there in black & white – every driver should be following that advice, and every driver should be encouraging others to do the same, particularly if they are instructors or supervising drivers. But those who don’t are really no worse than the horse riders who don’t follow their rules, or who stare sullenly at (or totally ignore) those who slow down and give them a wide berth. Speaking specifically about learner drivers, the ones who drive dangerously around horses are in a minority.

Speaking for myself, I actively seek out roads where horses and stables – and other animals – are likely to be found and teach my own pupils how to handle the situations properly (in the past, I’ve even stopped and got out if I’ve seen a smart-looking horse or pony just to comment on it). I have my own internal alarms, and there is no way one of my learners is going to overtake anything if I can’t be sure it’s safe to do so. So I obviously resent the implication in the thread-starter’s original post.

The problems are not with learner drivers (yawn!) but with society in general. The horse rider who doesn’t acknowledge courteous drivers, or who waves cars past on bends (no matter how well-intentioned) could easily end up teaching their own kids to drive at some point, after all. What message will they pass across?

I tell my learners that if they get a smile and a wave then they’ve done the right thing… but more and more often I have to add that that was one miserable little git on that horse, and I then relate my experiences with the local racehorse riders.

But I just have to quote one of the replies to the original forum post in full:

I have seen a lot of learners recently, in proper driving school cars, who have been completely ignoring the rules of the road, everything from lack of indicating and sudden stops for no reason, to dangerously pulling out on a roundabout when they didn’t have right of way. It wasn’t that many years ago I passed (or was it…?) but my instructor would never have let me get away with any of it, surely they have a brake pedal for a reason?
Admittedly none of this was when I was riding, but it seems they are just as bad even when there aren’t any horses around!

Yes, dear. And when YOU started learning to drive, you’ve obviously forgotten that that’s exactly what you are doing Learning.

You didn’t brake smoothly. You stopped suddenly. You forgot to indicate – often discovering that even when you remembered to, you’d indicated too soon, too late, or the wrong way. And I expect you were the same when you first got on a horse.

Horse riders have every right to use the roads. But roads are primarily for cars, and horses are more easily damaged. People – both riders and drivers – have to learn how to use them properly.

DSA Alert – Examiner Strikes June 2012

An email alert from the DSA concerning the impending examiner strikes in June (this text corrected by DSA on 1 June).

Driving examiner strike – candidates to attend tests

The Driving Standards Agency (DSA) is urging all practical driving test candidates booked to take a test on the afternoon of either Friday 8 or 15 June to attend as usual.

This is despite the potential for strike action by driving examiners who are members of the Public and Commercial Services (PCS) union.

The DSA’s chief executive Rosemary Thew said:

"All candidates have the opportunity to change or cancel their practical test by giving the DSA three clear working days notice.

"Not all examiners are members of the PCS union and even if they are, we can’t be sure that they’ll support the strike. So we’re asking candidates who have chosen to keep their test booking for the afternoon of 8 or 15 June to come for their test as normal so it can go ahead if possible.

"We’re sorry for the inconvenience this will cause and will do everything we can to minimise disruption for our customers."

Candidates who turn up but can’t take their practical test because of strike action will not have to contact the DSA to rebook. They should hear from the agency with a new date within five to ten working days.

If candidates fail to attend they won’t be able to claim out-of-pocket expenses if their tests are cancelled and they’ll need to rebook their own tests.

Theory tests are not affected and will be taking place as planned.

Details about claiming out-of-pocket expenses can be found on Directgov.

Candidates wanting to rebook their practical tests can do so on Directgov.

Get started

PCS is determined that the 21st Century should be thrown back into the 19th at all costs.

DSA Alert: General Advice

Another advisory from the DSA, this time a general one concerning slow-moving traffic:

Rule 151

In slow-moving traffic. You should

  • reduce the distance between you and the vehicle ahead to maintain traffic flow
  • never get so close to the vehicle in front that you cannot stop safely
  • leave enough space to be able to manoeuvre if the vehicle in front breaks down or an emergency vehicle needs to get past
  • not change lanes to the left to overtake
  • allow access into and from side roads, as blocking these will add to congestion
  • be aware of cyclists and motorcyclists who may be passing on either side

Read all the rules giving general advice (144-158)

This one is particularly relevant during the hot weather, where people behave more stupidly than they normally would.

DSA Alert: Motorways

The latest reminder from the DSA, this time concerning motorways:

Rule 259

Joining the motorway. When you join the motorway you will normally approach it from a road on the left (a slip road) or from an adjoining motorway. You should

  • give priority to traffic already on the motorway
  • check the traffic on the motorway and match your speed to fit safely into the traffic flow in the left-hand lane
  • not cross solid white lines that separate lanes or use the hard shoulder
  • stay on the slip road if it continues as an extra lane on the motorway
  • remain in the left-hand lane long enough to adjust to the speed of traffic before considering overtaking

Read all the rules about motorways (253-273)

I would imagine this is aimed at holiday traffic, though the jackasses who cause whole swathes of the M25, M6, M4, M1, and M80 to be closed daily at other times also ought to take note.