Category - Driving Tests

Reducing The Cost Of Motoring

This story has been covered in the press and in a DSA email alert, Apparently, the government (I’m not sure if they mean Mickey or Donald) has decided Government (coalition) headgear kitthat drivers need their help. According to The Mail, this means freezing the MoT charge until 2015, erecting signs along motorways to warn motorists of rip-off prices, and “reviewing” the cost of the driving test and provisional licence. Oh, and some stuff about stopping liars and lawyers cashing in on whiplash claims.

The one about road signs is already the only issue that matters as far as The Mail is concerned.

But in all honesty, it is just a joke. The MoT costs nearly £55, and if I remember correctly that went up from the previous price of £38 about four years ago. An MoT is only required for cars older than three years, and it has to be renewed annually after the first one, so if the price went up now it would only jump by £10-£20. That would equate to a massive additional outlay equivalent up to 5½ pence per day.

I think we’re all grateful to the government for freezing that one until 2015 (even though it will then go up by a larger amount to make up for lost time)!

Then there is the plan to erect illuminated price signs along the motorways so that you know how much it costs to fill up at the services en route.

Ministers hope it will highlight the sums being charged by some garages that believe they have a ‘captive market’, and encourage them to compete for custom.

So, these would be illuminated signs like the ones you get outside garages on non-motorway routes? Fantastic idea, and well worth the hundreds of A forecourt sign - non-motorwaythousands of pounds of MPs’ time which were no doubt required to come up with it!

Returning to Planet Earth, there is then the “review” of the cost of the driving test and a provisional licence. The test costs £62 at the moment, and somehow I can’t really imagine the price going down. Of course, a lot of instructors out there – especially the ones who have recently been trying to get into politics themselves – believe that the test is too expensive on the grounds that the hourly pro rata rate is more than instructors can command for lessons. Some will even go so far as to mention how the test only cost about £5 back in the 70s – even though £5 in 1970 would be worth £65.50 in 2013 money! Even after decimalisation the equivalent today would have been £35 or more. Therefore, the test has not gone up by that much.

But above all that, the structure of the part of government that manages tests is far too bureaucratic to justify being able to cut the price, and the only possible direction – apart from freezing it artificially – is upwards.

Oh yes. And the provisional licence costs £50. It is paid for once by 99% of the population.

If the idiots really wanted to cut costs for motorists they could do two things:

cut fuel duty

prosecute Nottingham City Council for commencing protracted simultaneous road works across the City

Buying A Car After Your Test

I’ve had a run of passes recently, and on the run up to their tests many pupils ask for advice on buying a car. It’s a difficult question to answer, because Honda Civicwe’ve all heard the stories about dodgy second-hand motors.

Some pupils can’t afford much, and what I tend to do is point out various car dealers as we drive around on our lessons. There are a lot of them springing up, and many specialise is very cheap cars – starting at below £1,000. However, it is definitely a case of “buyer beware”, and I never recommend one dealer over another (unless it’s a big one that I have experience of). One of my current pupils has dealt with one of these cheap car outlets and had a really bad experience (I saw the car, and it had a missing interior mirror and the gear stick was loose).

But it’s much easier to make a few recommendations when someone has a little more money to spend, because then you can point out the main dealerships – or approved second-hand car dealers. You can also find plenty of online resources to help you find the right car, like this one for used Honda Civics. Of course, a Civic might be too big for some people, so you can search for Jazzes and other models as you see fit. If you get the right site, all the links are to approved dealers, so you have that extra level of security.

These days, most manufacturers also have a strong social networking presence, and this often appeals to the younger driver. Sticking with Honda, they have Twitter, Facebook, and YouTube pages, as well as the ubiquitous main website. Judging from the activity on them – particularly Facebook – younger drivers really do use these things to find out information.

Of course, no one is saying that you have to buy from these sources, but having them there to browse through certainly opens up possibilities.

I had a pupil pass her test today, and the first thing she mentioned driving back from the test centre was how she now had to make the decision about which car to buy. She couldn’t afford a new one – but she had a budget with her boyfriend of a few thousand, and that opens up a lot of possible options. I also mentioned to her the lease option, or the car auction route (we have a big auctioneer with a Nottingham branch). Again, these are just two of many ways of sourcing a car these days.

When I see my ex-pupils driving around in their own car – whether it is a new one as a gift from wealthy parents, or a jalopy they have been saving up for – it gives me a warm feeling inside (and it’s not just from the chilli con carne I had for supper). If I helped them find the car, that feeling is just that little bit stronger.

Test Pass: 21/10/2013

Well done Kelly, who passed first time today with just 5 driver faults. Another satisfying one because I taught her from scratch, and doubly satisfying by Tickvirtue of something I’d forgotten about until she mentioned it in the car as we were travelling back afterwards.

On the very first lesson she was in tears after we ventured on to a quiet main road late one Sunday afternoon. Just being there turned out to be enough to turn her to jelly – she discovered she had a real phobia about driving. But we pushed through it and she reached test standard after 40 hours (and she’s in her late 20s, so that puts her even further ahead of the average).

Test Pass: 17/10/2013

Well done to David, who passed first time today with just 4 driver faults. This was one of the especially satisfying ones because a) he’s dyslexic, and b) I Ticktaught him from scratch.

It was funny coming back. We hit school run traffic and I asked him at one point if we could get to his road via the next turn on the right. He said we could, so I took the turn off. Once we were back on the main road near his house we approached a roundabout and he held his hand out and said “straight ahead at the lights” – like a seasoned instructor.

I turned to him and said “I’ll make you bleeding well walk in a minute!”

35% Off DSA Learning Materials

The DSA is offering 35% off all practical test learning materials until 20 October 2013 to celebrate “Practical Test Week” (how come I hadn’t heard of that?)

Make sure you use the promotional code PT13 when you check out on the TSO website.

Increasing The Minimum Driving Age: Update

The Daily Express is going all Daily Mail with this misinformed scaremongering session. It says:

A mandatory requirement for 120 hours of lessons could leave learner drivers footing a bill for £3,360 of lessons before even taking a test.

Some amateur hack with a calculator must have worked that one out. Shame they didn’t have a clue in the first place.

To start with, the number the hack came up with is based on an hourly lesson rate of £28 – and that’s in spite of someone in the article being quoted as saying average hourly rates are £18 (which would add up to £2,160). If instructors are charging £28 an hour in some areas, that’s what the market will stand, and it has no bearing on the rate charged in depressed areas because people there will not be paying £28.

Secondly, the proposals do not say that the entire 120 hours has to be with a driving instructor. Most learners have access to a car for private practice – many who never actually do any private practice still have access to a car if their parents would insure them. If the system changes, then so will the parents have to.

And finally, it will cost more in order to stop people killing themselves – no matter how that is achieved. Is that really as much of a bad thing as the Express and those it is quoting are making out? These lowlife hacks spend their lives whingeing about road deaths, and then oppose any plan to try and change it with rubbish stories like this one.

Bulgarian Driving Test Fraud

This is a story from Bulgaria, about Bulgaria, before the George Flag wavers get all excited. Apparently, from 2014 all Theory Tests in Bulgaria will have to Tablet computerbe completed using tablets (that’s “tablets” like the one shown on the left for any British ADIs looking in, and not the kind you take for incontinence).

This change is coming about due to the discovery that the existing pen and paper test is prone to corruption, and that the entire staff of the Road Administration Agency in Sofia had been found guilty of manipulating test results. Even to the point of opening sealed envelopes and substituting the correct answer sheets. And 80 private driving schools were also involved in the fraud. No one knows how long it had been going on, or how many people had gained licences based on fraudulent results. Nor does anyone know who made how much out of the fraud.

I guess we’ll never know, but I wonder if Bulgaria is suffering the same wave of whingeing that we had over here when the DSA decide to move away from laminated pictures of a few road signs and start using those new-fangled computers? Or like that when they introduced the Hazard Perception Test?

Increasing The Learning Age – Update

Another hot story is the one about raising the age at which people can take their tests to 18. As I mentioned in this article, there are plans to introduce a graded licence system and to introduce various restrictions on new drivers. So it is a little surprising to hear what the AA president, Edmund King, has to say after casting doubt on the plan:

What we’d like to see is to teach people to drive more carefully before they pass their test.

I think Mr King is about as far above the actual process of teaching “people to drive” as it’s possible to get. In other words, totally out of touch with reality. No one down at the sharp end with an ounce of intelligence would believe it were that simple. It’s wishy-washy nonsense.

The fact – and it IS a fact, Mr King – is that new drivers have already been taught how to drive properly. They’ve already been taught how to drive carefully. The fact that they do not is down to their experience, maturity, and upbringing. It is impossible to reconcile the first two without the passage of time. Experience takes time to develop, as does maturity.

The most mature 17-year old in the world could still be involved in an accident because of inexperience. And the most experienced 17-year old (if such existed) could still have an accident as a result of immaturity. It is a basic Law of Nature. It has held true since the first written records of human history, and it has persisted until the present.

And still you get people who think that a few namby-pamby words can make it all all right.

New drivers need to be kept out of certain high-risk situations until they have developed experience and maturity. It’s not as if these new proposals want to wrap them in cotton wool or anything – the aim is just to keep cars full of immature prats off the roads, especially at night, in the face of overwhelming evidence to support it.

Driving Tests Only In English (And Welsh)

That previous (well, previous to the previous) story about tests only being carried out in English from next year is hot news at the moment. A follow up story from the Beeb tells how Allyson Ng cheated on tests she was acting as interpreter for by giving the answers to pupils. The licences of 94 people were revoked as a result. Her operation was mainly based in Cardiff, with a small number in Birmingham.

Ng was charging people £110 a time for her “services”. DSA staff became suspicious when there was a sudden upturn in those using her.

She was jailed for 12 months for fraud.

However, this story illustrates one big reason why it is important that foreign language tests are eliminated as soon as possible.

A Rise In The Minimum Age For The Driving Test?

I’ll believe it when I see it – but since they have (so far) decided to stop non-English tests, anything is possible. This BBC story reports that teenagers could have to wait “a year longer” before being able to take their driving tests.

Much of it is a rehash of what has been said before. However, it is worth taking a look at the TRL paper it’s based on, because that is quite new and it outlines all the proposals to be considered. I just wish they’d talk in English instead of convoluted gov-speak. Attempting to sift out the important bits, we have:

  • graduated driving licence
  • minimum learning period
  • mandatory daytime and night time lessons
  • mandatory training log book
  • 12-month probationary licence on passing the test at age 18+
  • mandatory P plates during probationary period
  • night time 10pm-5pm curfew unless accompanied by someone 30+ years old
  • ban on carrying passengers under age 30
  • lower alcohol limit
  • ban on use of mobile phones (including hands-free)

Let’s hope they get off their arses and do something before we all die of old age!