Well done Petra, who passed yesterday with just 5 driver faults.
This has been one of those satisfying journeys. Petra had to retake her theory test and failed the practical four times before the first one ran out.
She was a very nervous driver when she came to me as a result of an accident in her homeland when she was younger and more than once was ready to give up – and especially so when she failed the last time and knew she’s have to retake the theory. The strange thing is that she was always one of those who I’d have put money on passing easily.
Fortunately, between her friends and me we persuaded her to carry on, and she passed first try with her new theory test out of the way.
The DSA has sent out an alert advising that it is not possible to book a practical driving test either by phone or online due to the theft of cables at BT.
I am assuming that this means someone has stolen cables which connect the DSA to BTs services (like nicking lead off church roofs or copper cables at railway signal boxes).
The fault is estimated to be fixed by tomorrow (12 October 2012).
Update: A new alert advises that BT won’t fix the fault until 13 October 2012 (Saturday).
Update: A new alert advises systems are all back up as of 12 October 2012.
Note: Interesting to see that – in certain strata of our unfortunate society, at least – this was entirely the DSA’s fault.
The DSA has sent out an email alert advising of changes to it’s website services.
From 17 October 2012, GOV.UK will replace Directgov and Business Link. In other words, there will be one website instead of several, and the DSA will be part of that single site.
You can play around with the test version here. It isn’t complete, and is just for browsing.
For instructors and learners, all the relevant stuff is under the first option on the homepage >> Driving, transport, and travel.
First impressions are that it is much easier and clearer than the existing sites. Hopefully, the existing DSA stuff will have been rewritten to fit in and won’t just be the old stuff from new links.
Well done Zaffy, who passed her test with no faults at all on Wednesday!
It wasn’t her first attempt, but it was definitely going to be her last until she passed her theory again – it was due to run out on Friday. Talk about cutting things fine! I’d managed to get this test booking as a cancellation after she failed a few weeks ago.
She’s been desperate to pass since she started with me, and that sort of got in the way on previous attempts. Only having one more shot available at it really seemed to make all the difference in her attitude and determination.
She’s been a pleasure to teach throughout, and her husband is a decent bloke, too. He definitely deserves some of the credit for helping her get through this.
I don’t think either of them appreciated the significance of a clean sheet. It was my third in as many years.
I was reading something recently and was struck by the shallowness in the way some people think. It’s a simple fact that just about anyone can learn to drive – the real question that no one seems to consider is should they?
Thinking of my own previous pupils for a minute, my quickest went from absolute zero (never driven before) to test pass in just 17½ hours – passing her test first time. My slowest one to date took around 160 hours and passed on his third attempt (which wasn’t bad, considering). Both were in the 17-24 age group, but I privately despaired at ever being able to get that second one up to test standard – and even then I worried about how he’d drive once he’d passed.
He was an unbelievably slow learner, even though he was holding down a good job in IT. There was absolutely nothing wrong with him except when he was behind the wheel of a car, and he was a really nice young chap. Every single aspect of learning to drive – how to use the clutch, how to brake, how to steer, etc. – had to be dealt with laboriously over months of lessons. And even when he could do them, he simply couldn’t apply them in real situations, and this took even more time to develop.
He wasn’t what you’d call wealthy, but he had no problem paying for lessons. I still felt terrible about the fact that he was paying me thousands of pounds (over £3,700 in the end) to teach him. I’d suggested a couple of times that he might want to consider learning in an automatic, but he was absolutely adamant that he wanted to pass in a manual car. In the end, I think the important thing was that we both knew that he had a problem, and that it wasn’t the tuition that was to blame.
That’s why those who try to suggest that the instructor is specifically the problem, offering epithets like “don’t be ashamed if you can’t do it – pass them over to someone who can”, are talking out of their backsides. I covered everything with this guy, in every way imaginable, in order to teach him how to drive. In the end we both succeeded and I doubt that anyone else could have done it any more quickly than I did.
However, one question I cannot answer is should he be driving?
When you travel the roads every day, you see dozens of people out there who – one way or another – are not good drivers. You get boy racers who think they’re good, but aren’t. You have older drivers whose faculties are declining. You get the white-knuckle matrons who are terrified of being on the roads at all, but go on them anyway. You get the diminutive 4×4 drivers who couldn’t handle a Tonka truck, let alone a 2½ tonne tank (especially near schools and in supermarket car parks). You get people who simply can’t do roundabouts, and who negotiate the same ones every day and do them wrong every time. The list goes on and on.
Should any of those be driving?
Far too many ADIs these days – and it is a fairly recent malady – seem to forget that teaching people how to drive is just a job, and the purpose of that job is to earn money by doing it well. In other words, as with most jobs, there is a balance to be found between purely financial concerns on the one hand, and professional and moral responsibilities on the other. You cannot take things to extremes.
Unfortunately, the exceptional ability of many ADIs to use “doublethink” clouds this distinction quite significantly. For example, specialising in teaching people who have health or age issues, but overlooking the obvious safety implications of letting them loose on the roads – where the moral implications are not even considered – might come across as very philanthropic. But it is a definite selling point which allows a premium price to be charged for the service, so the financial arguments are obviously highly significant.
Is it a sin to advise someone to learn in an automatic car when they have obvious issues controlling clutch and gears? Well, some might argue that the “inferior” ADI who can’t handle such difficult learners would do well to pass them over to someone who can. As I said above, this is utter crap – it is merely a covert marketing ploy by the “specialists”.
Sure, there are some ADIs who can’t even handle normal learners very well, let alone the tricky ones, but that isn’t the issue. What these experts always ignore is the fact that most pupils want to learn quickly and often cannot afford 150 hours or more of lessons. If I get someone who is open about having a budget that they cannot exceed, then I’m open with them about whether I think they can do it or not – and especially if I discover that their left and right feet can’t work the pedals, and still refuse to do so even after hours of trying. Indeed, it’s got to the stage where I make a point of mentioning the automatic option to some new budget-focused pupils once I’ve seen how they are likely to develop.
I’ve got one at the moment. Really nice lady who – on her first lesson – showed a lot of promise. She’d mentioned how she had a budget and had already considered learning in an automatic, but would prefer a manual licence if possible. However, about 7 hours in and it has become clear that her left foot has a mind of its own which isn’t likely to change overnight. I’ve explained clearly that I am absolutely certain she could learn in a manual car, but probably not as quickly as she’d like and she might want to reconsider the automatic option in light of that. The coordination problems that she experiences with the clutch and gears simply wouldn’t exist in an automatic. She is grateful that I have told her this, and although I will lose a pupil she’ll leave happy.
One I’ve mentioned before finally passed her test in an automatic on her 7th (I think) attempt. It took her two years of automatic lessons – and that’s on top of the two she spent with me, determined to succeed in a manual transmission car. Even after 100 hours it was a 50:50 bet on whether she’d put the clutch down before stopping. After her first automatic lesson she phoned me and beamed “it’s great! When I stop at traffic lights all I have to do is brake, and then let go when I want to move again.” That was exactly what she kept doing in the manual car, of course, which resulted in frequent stalls.
There is absolutely no way any “expert” could have made any difference. She simply had a problem with driving, and the fact that it took seven test attempts even with an auto instructor bears testimony to this. If she’d have stayed with me she could still easily have not been test ready even now. I estimate that she has spent in excess of £7,000 to get her licence. And yes, I worry about how she’ll cope when she gets her own car. An instructor’s moral concerns don’t just end with the public.
Anyone who is struggling to learn to drive in a manual car, and who has limited funds on which to draw, should seriously consider learning in an automatic. It’s no sign of weakness to advise them on that – in fact, it is potentially irresponsible and unprofessional not to advise them of that option.
I agree with all of these except the one about reducing the age limit. Drivers are already often too immature to handle a car properly and allowing them to get in one 6 months earlier is just stupid. It would put us on a par with certain American states, where you can drive from the moment you’re born, and where you’re also usually allowed to marry farm animals. All you have to do is trawl through the news stories from those backwoods places to see what the effect of allowing children to drive is on accident figures.
The insurers only want a lower age because it would make them more money. There’s no sense in the idea in terms of statistics, yet it would unquestionably increase the number of people requiring insurance.
If anything, the minimum driving age should be increased – certainly for males.
There’s no escaping the actual statistics, though. Young drivers DO have a disproportionately large number of fatal accidents, and a large number of those fall into the “more-than-one-occupant-late-night-rural-road-on-a-bend-no-other-car-involved” category. It’s fairly obvious that immaturity and attitude have to play a significant part in this – I wish someone would produce the statistics that compare young/new with older/new drivers (not all learners are still in nappies).
Note: Even if this were approved today, it wouldn’t become law for several years – and it would probably be defeated before it became law because British politicians after votes are lower down the evolutionary ladder than those animals you’re allowed to marry in some American states I mentioned above!
The DSA is circulating a new early-stage clip of the soon-to-be CGI version of the Hazard Perception Test (HPT) produced by Jelly. Once again, image clarity is superb.
Of course, it remains to be seen what the “experts” have to say on the matter. In spite of being early-stage trials I’m sure that someone will argue the sun is all wrong which gives a misleading impression of the speed because of the shadows, or the pilot car is doing something it shouldn’t, or something like that. Or some crap about it “being even more like a video game” – that’s always a good position to take to show how “expert” you are on the matter.
I did notice someone saying (in derogatory response to this latest clip) that the HPT doesn’t teach pupils to look in the mirrors.
It isn’t supposed to – that’s a service that ADIs are allegedly trained to provide. The HPT is supposed to give them an idea of what hazards to look for and when. It’s supposed to get them thinking – but quite how it can do that effectively if they have negative instructors teaching them is anyone’s guess.
Being able to pass the question part of the Theory Test doesn’t prove someone has perfect understanding of the Highway Code anymore than passing the HPT part means they have perfect hazard awareness skills when they’re out in their car.
But they have to at least think – just a little bit – in order to pass at all, and their instructor should build on that during their lessons.
Any ADI who can’t get this simple relationship past the prejudices that fill their thick skulls shouldn’t be doing this job.
The DSA has sent out a bulletin advising of the latest study aids for the theory test.
It would appear that the changes include sections which explain in detail (using words and pictures) the key points, and advice on how to study. There are also attempts to link the material with actual on-road situations.
Prices start at £7.99 for just a downloadable PDF, but go up to £19.99 for the “complete kit”. Note that a PDF will not provide mock test functionality – it’s just a book.
This is where I have to deviate from being in full support of the package. I advise all my pupils that the only thing they need to buy is Driving Test Success. This DVD contains everything needed to pass the test. It’s price tends to vary with time – that one I’ve linked to is £10 for the 2013 edition, but the 2012 edition is only £5.99 and I’m not aware of any real changes to the test between 2012 and 2013 (the big change was between 2011 and 2012, when they stopped publishing the actual test questions).
You can also get Driving Test Success for only £0.69 (yep! Sixty nine pence) each for the questions and HPT (hazard perception) immediately for your iPhone (no Android support, it would seem). That price is limited time, and is only correct at the time of writing.
The DSA one is certainly serviceable, but it’s just a bit expensive.
Well done Will, who passed today first time with just a single driver fault (it would have been a clean sheet if he hadn’t assumed that when the examiner asked him to pull over, she wanted him to reverse around a corner).
He’s a good driver, with plenty of previous experience – just learn from your past mistakes and don’t go down that route again!
It rounds off the perfect week for him, as he also got a job after being unemployed. It just goes to show that if you don’t give up you can achieve anything.
Well done Tim, who passed first time today with just 5 driver faults.
It comes at a good time, as he starts a new job next week. He was nervous (like most people are) but it didn’t affect him much in the end (as it doesn’t for most of those who ARE nervous).
He’s already insured and ready to go – but I’ve advised him to inform his insurance company he has passed, as some of them don’t consider the policy is valid unless you tell them you passed, and in the even of an accident there is a risk you won’t be covered.
Well done Petra, who passed yesterday with just 5 driver faults.
Well done Zaffy, who passed her test with no faults at all on Wednesday!
When you travel the roads every day, you see dozens of people out there who – one way or another – are not good drivers. You get boy racers who think they’re good, but aren’t. You have older drivers whose faculties are declining. You get the white-knuckle matrons who are terrified of being on the roads at all, but go on them anyway. You get the diminutive 4×4 drivers who couldn’t handle a Tonka truck, let alone a 2½ tonne tank (especially near schools and in supermarket car parks). You get people who simply can’t do roundabouts, and who negotiate the same ones every day and do them wrong every time. The list goes on and on.
Well done Will, who passed today first time with just a single driver fault (it would have been a clean sheet if he hadn’t assumed that when the examiner asked him to pull over, she wanted him to reverse around a corner).
Well done Tim, who passed first time today with just 5 driver faults.