Category - News

Who The Hell Is Katie Hopkins?

I will make no secret of the fact I had to look her up to find out who she was. I like The Apprentice TV show, but it is a measure of Hopkins’ profile that I had forgotten all about her (she was a contestant in 2007).You're fired!!!

Let’s face facts: none of the people who appear on The Apprentice are normal in the first place. However, if we’re lucky – and of the 156 contestants who have appeared over the series’ lifetime, we have been lucky 155 times – those who appear vanish off the radar within 7 days of being fired (quicker if we’re really lucky).

Katie Hopkins is the one exception. If you read that Wikipedia article, it seems that she has been moderately busy since her Apprentice appearance. She somehow managed to get herself labelled as “a celebrity”, and thus appeared on “I’m a Celebrity… Get Me Out Of Here!” and “Celebrity Big Brother”. She writes for The Sun (a right-wing tabloid) and has appeared on Question Time three times, presumably as a result of trying to get into politics in 2009. I note that she was fired by her employer partly as a direct result of her appearance on The Apprentice. She was sacked as a writer for two local (south coast) newspapers following a series of reader complaints and subsequent poll. She is considered to be a “professional troll” by virtue of her obnoxious comments (you can get a rough idea of her politics by imagining UKIP, then taking the mirror image of it, then bending a few bits here and there). She has been investigated by the police for comments she has made about high-profile news stories. Following her failed attempts in the political arena, she seems to be trying again in her characteristic gung ho manner. I saw reports of the latest police incident today, where she appears to have implied that Pakistani men and child abuse go hand-in-hand, while referring to Rochdale. As you can see, Hopkins really is a stellar talent – right up there, alongside David Cameron’s gardener or Nick Clegg’s barber.

This latest incident seems to be linked to another (politically-themed) story a few days ago. Hopkins had stated that she would quit the UK for good if Labour won the next election. My immediate – and I mean instantaneous – thought was “good”. Unfortunately, when I looked at some of the media stories, most of them seemed to have beaten me to the same punch line. Great minds, and all that.

Hopkins is a nobody who insults people whenever she opens her mouth. Most people like that get into fights in dank pubs on on Friday nights, and remain anonymous from their births to their deaths, with their only legacy being a number of unfortunate offspring, already conditioned to carry on the same message.

I can’t help wonder if a layer of artificial celebrity is in any way likely to alter this perpetual cycle.


Note that I used the question in the title in early 2015 and I wasn’t aware that anyone else had (nor do I particularly care). I notice that as of late 2015, various newspapers are also using it. You’re welcome, guys!

Proposed Changes to Driving Test

I saw this news clip on the BBC a couple of days ago. In one way, it’s old news (if you’re an instructor who reads the relevant channels). since DVSA announced its plans well over a month ago, and is due to commence trials very soon. It was also covered in various newspapers during February. The story concerns proposals to alter the content of the driving test.Satnav use in car

Judging from the BBC news item, you’d be forgiven for thinking it was all about cyclists yet again. The item features a woman who lost her husband (a cyclist) when he was hit by a (female) motorist who was farting about with a satnav and didn’t see him. In typical, saccharin-sweet, knee-jerk manner, this now means that the driving test should change solely to teach people about satnavs.

For f***s sake, satnavs come with an instruction manual. Even if people bothered to read it – or look at the pictures if they’re especially stupid – they are unlikely to follow any rule if it suits them not to. For example, every satnav manual in existence says – in words or in pictures – that you shouldn’t attach it directly in your field of view. Of course, that’s precisely where the vast majority of people put the damned things, where they could easily obscure the driver’s view of pedestrians, cyclists, and even other vehicles. They do it because they’re idiots – you know the ones: they have the satnav running when they go to the shops or travel to and from work – and no amount of “training” would ever make them do it any other way.

Every satnav manual also says not to use it while you are moving. Some units (and I wouldn’t be surprised to learn that this applied to all of them) even nag you about it every time you turn them on – on my Ford, I don’t think you can’t turn the visual nag off, and you just have to press OK each time you start it for the first time after each engine start. And yet almost every driver in existence attempts to programme them or play around with the settings while they’re moving. Again, no amount of “lessons” now will ever change that – if they want to fiddle with it while they’re driving, then they will, and no one is going to persuade them otherwise.

It’s the same with mobile phones. Every jackass 17-year old (and anyone else, come to that) knows full well they shouldn’t use them while they’re driving. But of course, that rule only applies to everyone else, and not to them.

To be honest, I’m sick and tired of cyclists being held up as sentimental shields to try and prove points against motorists. The vast majority of cyclists are far less well-behaved on the roads than the vast majority of drivers. The majority disobey almost every Highway Code rule  going at one time or another (not giving signals, riding on pavements, riding across pedestrian crossings which aren’t designated for cycles, red lights, and so on). The fact that they also ignore cycle routes and deliberately mix it with traffic might well appear to be a brilliantly militant way of proving their entitlement to use the roads, but it’s bloody stupid if they end up dead as a result of being right.

If these bleeding hearts are going to keep going on about petty issues like using satnavs, maybe they need to look elsewhere for the cure. Because another thing that makes my blood boil is the number of times I see mummies and daddies stopping on yellow zigzags in the morning to let their own brats out, obviously believing the rules about stopping on those only apply to others. And those idiots in spandex who shun cycle paths to deliberately get in the way of busy traffic on national speed limit roads. Or those who ride in huge groups on narrow country lanes.

Most of those people are parents, and their arrogant and ignorant attitudes are the real reasons why idiot 17-year olds use satnavs and mobile phones while they’re driving. Pity the kids being brought up by people who behave like this. It’s inevitable that if they are being taught adult skills by a bunch of retards who think it’s fun to get in the way of lorries and cars traveling at 60 or 70mph just to prove a point (or stop where it is illegal to stop, or cross where it is illegal to cross, and so on), is it any wonder they run the risk of killing someone when they become responsible for themselves? Poor parenting is the problem, and that’s where any training ought to be taking place.

As things stand, a 40 minute test involving 10 minutes of using a satnav – one of the changes being trialled – will have as much effect on the attitude of the average 17-year old as a drop of water does on the level of the Pacific Ocean. Much bigger changes are needed.

Domino’s Pizza Wobble-boarders

Nottingham City Council really are a bunch of idiots.

Over the last couple of weeks, Domino’s Pizza has been using human billboards (known as wobble-boarders) to advertise its products.

Basically, they get a bunch of cash-strapped students to wear giant pizza boxes with a special offer price on it to stand on corners. Depending on how extrovert the respective student is, you may get a dance or a wave as you drive by.

Quite frankly, they’re not doing any harm, so it comes as a major surprise (or maybe not, when you think about who the council are) to discover that this activity is actually very, very dangerous on several levels:

…degrading and exploitative.

They were a dangerous distraction to drivers and obstructing the highway.

So dangerous, in fact, that Domino’s has been threatened with a community protection notice and £20,000 fine:

…detrimental effect, of a persistent or continuing nature, on the quality of life of those in the locality.

What a bunch of arseholes they really are. No one wearing a wobble-board was forced to do it, so the “degrading and exploitive” nature of the scheme exists solely in the minds of people who couldn’t get a real job themselves and so ended up working for the council. And as for affecting “the quality of life of those in the locality”… absolute bollocks.

It reminds me of a similar scheme a few years ago where Kennelgate (I think it was) had paid students to dress up in animal costumes and do pretty much the same thing. In fact, they must have recruited their students exclusively from the performing arts colleges judging by the antics they got up to, and I can remember me and my pupils saying what a good idea it was (we’d never seen anything like it before). I don’t recall reading any stories about how that was banned (though with hindsight it probably was)

The average cyclist is a million times more dangerous than a Domino’s wobble-boarder.

Do You Ever Get That Feeling?

I’ve mentioned many times – most notably, in the About Me page – how I had to put up with increasingly moronic policies and attitudes when I worked in the rat race. I’ve also written frequently about how society is on a continuous downward slope as things which were once illegal or taboo became almost normal – in some cases, actually encouraged. There is no longer any fitting punishment for many types of criminal behaviour, and I’ve commented many times on examples of bad driving where the perpetrators have almost literally got away with murder.

When I was young, you knew the difference between right and wrong. Your parents taught it to you, and even if they didn’t the threat of arrest and prosecution was a powerful deterrent to the vast majority of people who, thanks to their ineffectual parents, were missing a chromosome and who would otherwise have run amok. Every few generations some scumbag like Hitler (or Stalin, or Saddam Hussein) would appear and threaten society, but society (or nature) would eventually manage to deal with the issue.

Recently, Boris Johnson – a guy who I actually quite like in spite of his unfortunate political allegiance – has been getting a lot of bad press over some comments he made about jihadists. It turns out what he actually said was considerably more graphic than what the paper publications dared to publish. In print, he appeared to merely allude to jihadists being “wankers”. In fact, that’s exactly what he called them.

Let’s remind ourselves for a moment what these jihadists have been guilty of over the last couple of years. This year alone, they have beheaded two Japanese hostages. Last year they beheaded French, Australian, and American hostages. There are stories of monkey-see-monkey-do jihadists in primitive countries beheading children simply because they are Christian. And the most recent gut-churning episode sees the burning alive of a Jordanian pilot they captured.

They are the lowest of the low. Scum. Murderers. Loved by no God – whatever name He might go by. They’re worse than Hitler and Stalin by a long chalk. And they’re cowards who hide under a group name instead of being personally accountable for their insane public antics.

I think Boris Johnson was much, much nearer to the mark than the do-gooders who are on his case are capable of realising.

Darwin Awards 2015

Well, competition is hotting up already for the 2015 Darwin Awards. This story on the BBC skirts around the details, but The Independent apparently calls it like it is.Brighton Pier and bad weather

Two men are almost certainly dead after going swimming in the sea in Brighton. If that wasn’t bad enough, consider that they were in their 20s, had been drinking, and decided on this seemingly clever course of action at around 1am. And if you still think it sounds OK, consider also that there were force 9 gales – the sea tends to become a little unpredictable when it’s that windy.

At the end of the BBC version, a separate Brighton incident is reported where an 18-year old deliberately went into the sea at 9am. He got out again.

It’s hard to feel any sympathy whatsoever for any of these morons. Coastguard staff could (and still could) have died, just because of these juvenile prats and their undiagnosed learning disabilities.


An update to the story suggests that it was a “dare”. In some respects, that makes it an even more stupid act.

And This Is Why We Have Problems

This story from ITV News reports that in Birmingham it is routine for drivers with 12 points or more on their licences not to be banned. Examples include:

  • 77-year old has at least 12 points for speeding
  • 63-year old has 12 points for using mobile phone, speeding, and shooting red lights
  • 56-year old has 12 points for drink-driving and having no insurance
  • 19-year old has 15 points for speeding and failing to identify the driver
  • Of the 20 youngest to have 12 points or more, only two have been banned

All those in the legal system associated with not banning these people are complete arseholes, intent on sending this country into the sewer (and it doesn’t really need much help with that as it is).

These miscreants should be named. Come to think of it, so should the morons who didn’t ban them.

Union Flag Nonsense

It seems that new driving licences will now include the Union Flag as well as the EU one. Transport Minister, Claire Perry, said:

People in this country rightly take pride in our national flag which is why I am delighted it will now be displayed on British driving licences.

Celebrating Britain strengthens our sense of national identity and our unity. I will feel proud to carry my new licence and I hope others will too.

Well, actually, no. The change is pointless, and it smacks of nationalism, which I detest. Hopefully, the idea will get reversed (or an opt-out introduced) some time in the next 10 years before my licence is due for renewal.

Unfortunately, I can see it appealing to quite few people and, therefore, gaining a few votes for the current Mickey Mouse government we have. Incidentally, no one has claimed anywhere that the change has anything to do with cutting bureaucracy or reducing costs. In fact, with 127,000,000 licences having been issued since 1998 even as little as a tenth of a penny on the cost of each licence would amount to over £100,000.

Driving School of Mum and Dad

Surrey and Hampshire News (an outfit that obviously can’t afford a real web server for its publication, because this story is no longer available after less than two weeks) reckons that only 1 in 3 learners are taking lessons with qualified instructors, opting instead to be taught by family members.

I’m not sure I trust their figures. If nothing else, they fail to follow up on all those who start out with the cheaper option, then end up failing their tests and have to go to a proper instructor for remedial training later. Perhaps the quoted figure by MoneySuperMarket – that is costs “a whopping” £1,128 to learn to drive with an ADI – reflects this?

You see, £1,128 would equate to around 50 hours of lessons (well, 45 hours, plus the theory test and practical test fees) using my hourly rates. During this last year I’ve had one pupil do it in 14½ hours, and many others manage well under 40 hours, and I can’t see how or why this should be much different elsewhere if the training is up to scratch. In fact, what I think we’re starting to see is the effect of cheap lessons – the story and MoneySuperMarket only seem concerned about that, anyway – and the resulting quality issues.

I lost count long ago of the number of people who had been “taught” by mum or dad, or by a cheaper instructor, but who subsequently realised they weren’t getting anywhere. The biggest problem in most cases was getting rid of their appallingly bad habits.

City Link Goes Bust

Note the various updates at the bottom of this post. Also note that it is a very old article.

This is a shitty story for Christmas. The parcel delivery service, City Link, has gone bust after 45 years in business. Basically, nearly 3,000 employees have lost their jobs overnight – and virtually without any warning whatsoever.

Although this is bad enough, it is really just a sign of the times. These things happen. But what makes it really shitty is the timing – bosses waited until all the Christmas deliveries had been made on Christmas Eve, then told everyone they were out of a job on Christmas Day.

It stinks.

It reminds me of when I was in the rat race, at a time when my star was still in its ascendant. I was the manager of a manufacturing department in a blue chip company which employed many temporary staff as cheap labour. It was routine to employ them right up until the time when they either had to be taken on as permanent or released, and then let them go. I hated it, because some of them were bloody good trained workers and deserved full-time employment. What made it worse was that we’d replace them with more temps a few months later.

One year, I was told to tell all the current temps in the department that they were being let go a week before Christmas. They weren’t at the end of their contracts on this occasion. It was purely a financial move to fix the departmental budget. I’d pleaded with my arsehole of a manager to wait until the New Year – it was only a few more weeks, after all – but his manager was an even bigger arsehole and the deed had to be done. I’d even suggested to my manager that he do it given the timing, but his attitude was that it was my job. No prizes for guessing why he passed up on the opportunity – he was just a stinking coward.

I’ll never forget that night. It was around 8pm and freezing cold outside. My manager had gone home to his warm middle-class house and ever-loving wife, of course.

That year, I screwed up Christmas for all those temps – and for myself, even though I couldn’t do anything about it. The temps (and certain other staff) hated me for it thereafter, even though I managed to get a few of them back later the following year. They didn’t have a clue what I’d tried to do for them (to be honest, it wouldn’t have mattered if they had). And with hindsight – literally, it just occurred to me as I wrote this – my feelings on the matter and the resulting staff perception probably had some impact on how my career panned out later.

How do some people sleep at night?


There are now follow up stories to this topic. Some interesting comments from employees/contractors who probably won’t get paid – some finding themselves £70,000 out of pocket.

At each new development I can see further parallels with the scumbags I had the misfortune to work for. Standard corporate mentality these days seems to be to sub-contract work out (parallels with the “temps” I described above). That way, you can screw people whenever you feel like it without having to worry about employment law coming and biting you in the ass.

Then there is the comment from one of those affected about “lots of layers of management”. Just as I experienced in the rat race, the customer counts for nothing as long as you can maintain an empire that looks good on Powerpoint slides. Quite frankly, the investors probably drooled over those and completely missed the signs early on. You can just see it: most of the actual City Link employees would have been the highly-paid managers, with the important people – the delivery drivers – being mainly sub-contractors, forced to work until midnight every day to make a living wage.

A person connected to the investment firm that owns City Link told the BBC the delivery industry had become too competitive for City Link to survive.

A clever play on words, there. Yes, when you are paying wages to superfluous office-based managers you won’t be competitive. If your business is founded on delivering parcels, that’s where the money should be spent. The industry had become too competitive for City Link as it was being run. The industry in question is actually a huge market 21st century market with money to be made for the right players.


This whole business just gets worse and worse. The latest news is that City Link employees will become redundant on New Years Eve!

Regular readers will know that I have little time for unions, and it’s hard to see what the RMT can do in this case. But one comment is telling, because it once again points to the way firms are run in this day and age:

… [the RMT said] there had been a “truly horrific catalogue of mismanagement” at the firm…

As I implied earlier, far too many managers lining the pockets of those above them.

I also note that the company which acquired City Link, Better Capital, is described as a “restructuring specialist”. I know from first hand experience that these types of company – which includes consultants – do not strip companies from the top down. It’s always from the bottom up – or in other words, the end that does all the work. That’s why they have apparently (according to employees) been contracting out and getting rid of salaried drivers. They’ve been playing around with the low-level workforce, and no doubt introducing layer after layer of extra management to deal with the additional complexity that has resulted. No wonder they’ve gone bust. City Link also has a very low rating of 3.3 on TrustPilot, so it can’t have been run efficiently.

City Link lists revenues of £300 million annually, and yet it still got screwed.


And the final indignity – 2,356 people have lost their jobs on New Year’s Eve. Although it isn’t clarified yet, an attempted buy out by an “unnamed consortium” was refused for being “not acceptable”.

Around 370 staff have been retained for the time being to deal with uncollected parcels, and when they finally go the total of unemployed will rise to over 2,700.

Ebola Case In UK

This is what it feels like playing Russian Roulette – but with someone else holding the gun. There has been a confirmed case of Ebola in the UK, brought back by a nurse from Sierra Leone.Russian Roulette bullet in chamber

There is now a mad panic trying to trace all the people who travelled with the woman – who returned to Glasgow via Casablanca and London, and who is now back in London for treatment.

What is laughable are the comments by Paul Cosford of Public Health England:

…the case did not “put anyone in the public domain at any significant risk”.

Actually, everyone in the UK is now at pretty much as at risk as the nurse, who was “protected” by the same systems and technology that are now protecting us from her, and which failed. We’re also subject to the same failings in screening that could allow any additional cases to spread the illness before they are identified.

Cosford also seems to forget that scientists have been predicting that Ebola would reach Britain since at least October. And they were right.