Category - News

Mixed Messages, Or What? New Book Reckons You Can Learn To Drive In 24 Hours

This came in on the newsfeeds. A driving instructor has published a book which claims to teach people to drive in 24 hours.

In the article, the most bizarre list of contradictory nonsense is put forward, with the instructor Driving for Dummies - mocked up cover, not the one for the actual bookin question claiming to take a “totally different approach” to learning to drive. He says that he “listens to his pupils” and “cut[s] out red tape”. He claims that he lets them know from day one that he “is their friend, not their superior”. And it’s incredible that he’s stayed in business for so long if he’s always followed the mantra about them paying as little as possible.

I love it when someone takes something that is really simple in terms of the skills needed – like learning to drive – and then tries to take “a totally different approach” to teaching it. It’s like wanting to travel from London to Scotland – most people would foolishly believe that this involves driving North, but then some comedian like this guy comes along and that you should drive South instead! It’s just a pointless complication.

The reality is that it doesn’t matter how much of a “friend” you think you are to your pupils, you are still taking money off them and providing a service – and that’s above and beyond the fact that there is usually a 30+ year difference in ages. The average youngster doesn’t consider “old” friends to be very cool at all.

Instructors have business relationships and not “friendships” with their pupils. If a cheaper deal comes along, most of them will be off like a cat in a rainstorm. No amount of perceived “friendship” will hold on to them.

Of all the people I’ve ever taught, I remain in regular contact with just one of them (even though he’s a Chelsea supporter). I’ve lost count of the number of my ex-pupils who have seen me in the street over the years, or in the local supermarket, and who have tried to pretend they haven’t if they’re with their mates (one of them even did it while I was still teaching her). It’s the immature mind-set of most teenagers, and anyone who thinks that they’re a genuine “friend” is just deluding themselves.

You can learn all there is to know about driving in a few hours, just like you can learn all there is to know about playing the guitar by reading a book in a day. But learning how to drive properly – or play guitar – takes longer. MUCH longer.

Driving instruction is about teaching people what to do, and how to do it properly through practice. By definition, practice results in experience, and experience takes time. Certainly more than 24 hours.

If you cut out the practice, you’re putting people on the road before they are ready. But maybe this is what this instructor means by “cut[ting] out red tape”.

Edit: I’ve noticed a lot of people finding this page having searched for “driving for dummies”. Come on, people! Even if there was a book with that title it wouldn’t help you. I made that image above myself as a joke.

The only book that comes close is Driving: The Essential Skills. But don’t think that it will teach you how to do the basics – the only way to learn that is to practice in a real car.

DSA: New Rules Concerning Epilepsy

An email alert from the DSA notes that from 8 March 2013, people who have only had epileptic seizures while asleep could be considered for a licence after only 1 year instead of the previous 3 years.

Similarly, those whose seizures have not affected consciousness appear to be able to apply for a licence while they are still having these seizures.

I’m not sure what the reasoning is. If it’s medical then I will accept it. Anything else and I’ll have reservations.

DSA Phone Service Changes

An email alert from the DSA says that from 2 April 2013, phone lines for booking tests will only be Computer Mouseavailable between 8am and 12pm (instead of the current 8am until 4pm). This is in line with the falling numbers of people booking via telephone.

Booking online is by far the easiest way. You can book your theory test and practical test on the DSA’s site at GOV.UK.

There are still a bunch of radical ADIs who oppose this on the grounds that their “older” pupils might not have access to, or be familiar with, the internet. Quite frankly, those people are likely to have issues with any booking system.

We’ve come a long way since Victorian times. It’s a shame that some people still want to stay firmly embedded in the past, though. The majority of people can easily book via the internet. Those who can’t will be able to use their ADIs to book it for them. There isn’t a problem unless you look for one.

Driving Tests At Nottingham Trent University (Update)

The BBC local news has covered the first day of tests being conducted out of Nottingham Trent University. No big deal, except for a couple of things on the report worth mentioning

First of all, tests were clearly going out with snow and ice visible on the roads (the Trent car park in particular). I’m pretty certain that on any other day – without the cameras being there – they probably wouldn’t have. Tests were even cancelled for fog last week (and that’s a first for me).

The other interesting thing was the “driving instructor” they interviewed (I used inverted commas there because a proper driving instructor Village Idiot - ADIwould possess business sense whilst simultaneously knowing what they were talking about)..

In response to the BBC’s statement that the numbers of young people taking tests is falling, this stupid idiot claimed that the reason for this was the cost of the theory and practical tests. In particular, by stating that the practical test “costs £65” (Rosemary Thew was also interviewed and pointed out that these prices have not changed for several years).

In actual fact, the practical test DOESN’T cost £65. It costs £62. An instructor should know that, but this one” couldn’t even get such an important detail right – and she did it right in front of the cameras!

Now that she’d identified overall cost as a “problem” to the mummies and daddies out there watching in middle-class, local TV-land, she provided inaccurate data to support her claims.

The simple fact is that the cost of the two tests is less than 10% of the total cost of learning to drive for a typical learner. Over 90% of the expense is on driving lessons. So, having gotten everyone’s attention, and so identifying that costs of learning to drive are “too high”, what does she now suggest? That we ADIs should all cut our lesson prices to reduce the expense of learning to drive?

This woman typifies what is wrong with this industry. Too many idiots are allowed into it who see it as a philanthropic mission instead of a job, and who try to develop mother-child relationships with clients. Get it into your thick skulls: if someone can’t afford driving lessons, then they simply don’t have driving lessons. That’s it. End of story.

Learning to drive IS expensive. Buying an hour of someone’s time for anything is also expensive. That expense isn’t a sign that the person selling the time is charging too much!

Ineffective instructors who don’t have to pay for their car, who do the job to use up some spare time (“now that the kids have left home”), and whose losses are subsidised by the main breadwinner of the house do not represent this industry at all. By opening their stupid mouths on TV they are damaging it further all the time.

Driving Tests At Nottingham Trent University

The DSA has confirmed the locations and commencement of driving tests from two of Nottingham Trent University’s sites.

The service commences from 11 March 2013. Tests will be available from the Clifton Campus on Mondays and Wednesdays, and from Clarendon Street on Tuesdays and Thursdays.

I must stress that I don’t have any issues, in principle, with doing tests from these sites. I’m not convinced by the government’s “bringing the test to the people” mantra, but that’s another story.

However, the practicalities of this service do worry me a little. In particular, will there be any half-witted ADIs “practising” in the bays when you get there; and how the hell will candidates get off the Clifton campus to do their tests (the A453 is allegedly second only to the M25 in terms of the volume of traffic that goes along it). Indeed, the traffic density on the A453 – it ranges from almost gridlock all the way up to total gridlock for 23 hours of the day (or worse if some prat breaks down or crashes on it) – means that even getting on to the site is a challenge-and-a-half.

And then there are the road works – A453 widening has just started and is scheduled to last TWO YEARS, and Nottingham’s huge white elephant (aka “Phase II of the Tram”) is still more than a year away from completion, resulting in road closures throughout the area (including the City Centre site also being used for tests). So I wonder how many people will be late for their tests as a result?

Instructions on how to arrive are given in the link.

DSA: Despatch, March 2013

The latest edition of Despatch is now available from the DSA (issue 01/2013).

Topics in this issue include the review of foreign languages on tests, using your phone to book tests, ADI registration, and a couple of other stories already covered in alerts.

DSA: Six Arrested In Fraud Operation

An email alert from the DSA is obviously intended to show transparency, and a strong desire to stamp out corruption.

It happened in London in February, and was a joint operation between the DSA’s Fraud & Integrity Team and the Metropolitan Police. An examiner, ADI, and four test candidates were arrested. Consequently, 100 driving licences are being revoked.

The operation was shown on BBC News, which you can watch here. It isn’t available for embedding.

DSA Advice: Fitness To Drive

An email alert from the DSA. Timely advice given the Cassie’s Law situation.

Rule 92

Vision. You MUST be able to read a vehicle number plate, in good daylight, from a distance of 20 metres (or 20.5 metres where the old style number plate is used).

If you need to wear glasses (or contact lenses) to do this, you MUST wear them at all times while driving.

The police have the power to require a driver to undertake an eyesight test.

Remember that anything in the HC which says “MUST ” in red is supported by Law. You’re breaking the Law if you ignore it.

DSA: Driving Test Application Forms

An email alert from the DSA explains that you can now only book your theory or practical test by post if you’re paying by cheque or postal order. Forms for doing this have changed and must be requested by calling the DSA.

Booking online is far quicker and simpler. Quite frankly, it’s hard to believe there are still more than a tiny number of people who want to pay by cheque or postal order, and who have no other means of doing it online.

That doesn’t stop certain “philanthropist” ADIs out there criticising the DSA over it, though.

A QC Who Thinks He Has The Answer

OK, I suppose they’re not that rare – QCs who think they know it all, that is – but whenever they open their mouths you still have to wonder what planet they come from.

This letter in the Financial Times (you have to register, but it’s free) is from Julian Malins, QC (he’s signed it, so that’s why I’m mentioning him by name). It came through in the newsfeeds with the headline title “Driving test is too difficult so many do not bother at all”, so it naturally caught my attention.

It is all to do with a previous FT story about the declining numbers of young people taking the driving test, explained as being due to financial constraints and the like.

Our expert QC berates the FT for this. Apparently, it is obvious (to him, at any rate) that the only reason people don’t take the driving test as much is that it is too hard!

It would appear that his sole source of evidence is that the police once told him that as much as 10% of all drivers on the M25 at any time are unlicensed.

He should look outside of London, EC4 (he probably isn’t aware that people even live outside of EC4). In some places, notably in Yorkshire, as many as 90% of all drivers are uninsured or unlicensed in some areas, and I got that off the police in those cop shows on cable.

I’m not sure what our expert QC would suggest, though if you join the dots the obvious answer is that the test should be made easier or just abolished. Malins suggests that this is why magistrates courts are filled with these people.

You have to wonder how such naïveté could be found in someone who is actually capable of destroying someone’s life as a result of these totally inaccurate beliefs.