Category - News

“Mother” Downed Bottle Of Vodka Before Going On School Run

I thought the word “mother” should be in inverted commas. It was either that, or insert the word “unfit” before it.

This story tells how the specimen in question – her name is withheld to “protect the identity of the children” – drank almost a full bottle of vodka, then went to pick up her three kids from school.

The story isn’t quite clear on whether she actually did pick them up – she says she didn’t, but they were found in a local supermarket under the “supervision” of a friend aged 10. The children in question were aged between three and seven.

She blew 110 – the legal limit is 35 – so she was almost four times the drink drive limit.

Incredibly, she got away with a community sentence, a curfew, and a two year ban. If she’d have been a man she’d have got a lot worse, so the sentence smacks of discrimination. It also appears that the poor children have not been taken away from her, so God knows what they’ll turn into when they are older (and being out alone in a supermarket already gives a suggestion of which way they’re heading).

Gerry Anderson Dies, Aged 83

Sad news today that Gerry Anderson, the creator of TV shows Thunderbirds, Stingray, and Fireball XL5 - A Gerry Anderson CreationFireball XL5 (amongst others) has died at the age of 83. He was suffering from Alzheimer’s and his condition worsened over recent months, according to his son.

My earliest recollection as a child was of Fireball XL5, and I was an avid Stingray and Thunderbirds fan when I they came along. Anderson also went on to create other landmark shows such as Joe 90, UFO, and Space 1999.

Even today, the special effects – in Thunderbirds especially – make you think “how did they do that with puppets and toys, and no computers”. Anderson’s shows helped define a generation, and his death marks the end of an era.

Foxhunting – It’s That Time Of Year Again!

Every year, on Boxing Day, you’d be forgiven for thinking that bad things stop happening everywhere else in the world and that the only item worth reporting on the BBC news is a Fox with head stuck in wheelbunch of toffee-nosed Hoorays dressing up in silly costumes and racing around the countryside.

Actually, until the foxhunting ban was imposed in 2005, it was really quite sick watching these privileged prats set off to chase foxes to exhaustion, then tear them apart with packs of hounds. But it seems that some are still at it!

A few days ago, the RSPCA brought successful charges against the Heythrop Hunt in Oxfordshire, where Richard Sumner and Julian Barnfield  were found guilty of hunting foxes with dogs. In other words, they were deliberately breaking the law. The Heythrop Hunt also pleaded guilty to the same charges.

As a further nail in the coffin of the pro-hunt lobby, a story today suggests that the government isn’t going to allow a vote to take place that it is likely to lose, so a repeal of the foxhunting ban isn’t likely to happen in 2013.

Research/opinion polls suggest that only 15% of the population supports the idea of scrapping the ban. It isn’t hard to imagine who the 15% are. A more recent update to the story makes it clear that the government would lose a vote if one were held.

Some of the comments at the bottom of that earlier article make interesting reading.

And since the BBC has nothing else to report on Boxing Day, it makes a big deal out of a French hunt. The title just about says it all – a city man can’t understand our life – but this quote says even more:

Hunt Master Mathieu Berge explains that while he accepts hunting is “cruel”, he believes it is a part of country life that “a city man will never understand”.

Those who are pro-hunting over here should just man up and admit they have the same sentiments. It IS cruel – but they just don’t care. And they think they’re special – but they aren’t.

DSA Advice: Motorways

More timely advice for this season of the year. This one’s about motorways:

Rule 266

Approaching a junction. Look well ahead for signals or signs. Direction signs may be placed over the road. If you need to change lanes, do so in good time.

At some junctions a lane may lead directly off the motorway. Only get in that lane if you wish to go in the direction indicated on the overhead signs.

Judging by the Highways Agency alerts the last couple of days (that’s Christmas Eve and Christmas Day) some people really could do with this advice.

DSA Advice: Breakdowns

Very relevant at this time of year and what with the weather we’re having. This latest advice concerns breakdowns:

Rule 274

If your vehicle breaks down, think first of all other road users and:

  • get your vehicle off the road if possible
  • warn other traffic by using your hazard warning lights if your vehicle is causing an obstruction.
  • help other road users see you by wearing light-coloured or fluorescent clothing in daylight and reflective clothing at night or in poor visibility.
  • put a warning triangle on the road at least 45 metres (147 feet) behind your broken-down vehicle on the same side of the road, or use other permitted warning devices if you have them. Always take great care when placing or retrieving them, but never use them on motorways.
  • if possible, keep your sidelights on if it is dark or visibility is poor.
  • do not stand (or let anybody else stand) between your vehicle and oncoming traffic.
  • at night or in poor visibility do not stand where you will prevent other road users seeing your lights.

It goes without saying that ignoring ROAD CLOSED signs is stupid.

Youngsters Don’t Know Drink Drive Limits. So Bloody What?

The Telegraph put on its Daily Mail costume this week and reported the shocking fact that the majority of 17-24 year old drivers don’t know what the blood alcohol limit for drinking and driving is.

Well, whoopee-doo.

All this comes out of new “research” by Red Driving School (i.e. a questionnaire it gave to some learners), which reveals “shocking gaps” in young driver education and awareness. Complete bollocks, as it shows no such thing.

Oh, there are shocking gaps in young driver education and awareness, all right, but this most definitely isn’t one of them.

Ian McIntosh, CEO at RED Driving School, said:

…it is vital that they are informed of simple facts such as the drink driving limit.

He doesn’t explain why, which would have been very interesting to hear.

I have this vision of a bunch of 17-24 year olds all taking samples of their blood and running them through their in-car gas chromatograph – no doubt installed as a mod along with their wide exhaust pipes and blue LEDs.

The “study” is flawed on so many levels. Most of the respondents had seen their parents drink and drive – so they obviously know that it is wrong because they can identify it. Nearly half would refuse to be a passenger with someone who’d been drinking – again illustrating a clear understanding of what’s right and what’s wrong. And yet the “researchers” still try to suggest that not knowing what the blood alcohol limit is means young drivers would go out and do it without realising.

Utter crap!

They should have also asked the same group what a “milligramme” was. I bet 99% of them wouldn’t have had a clue, so how they’d be able to apply that to the number of milligrammes of alcohol in blood is anyone’s guess.

You can’t accurately predict blood alcohol based on what you drink. That’s why they keep telling you that it depends on things like your sex, build, and other stuff. The only way of working it out is either to know what your breath alcohol is – which means having an accurate breathalyser to hand – or taking a blood sample and having it analysed. So knowing the numbers is absolutely pointless, except for the purposes of answering an exam question!

People get caught drink-driving because they ignore the rules – not because they don’t know what the rules are!

For anyone desperate to win a pub quiz over Christmas, the answers are:

  • 80mg alcohol per 100mls of blood
  • 35mg alcohol per 100mls of breath
  • 107mg alcohol per 100mls of urine

And remember that if you’re going to drive, don’t drink at all. Or if you’re going to drink, just don’t drive. It ain’t rocket science, people.

Driving Instructor Caught With No Insurance

This story tells how driving instructor Alan Taylor, 51, admitted to having no insurance when he appeared in front of magistrates on December 6. He was driving an uninsured car back from the garage when he was stopped by police.

Now, I’m not defending him, but when you read the story it doesn’t look like he did it deliberately – it was just bloody silly, really. Yes, it’s his own fault, but he’s not like the trash who purposely don’t even consider buying insurance and yet who still drive.

Taylor had told the court that he could get stricken from the Register and lose his job as the minimum penalty for having no insurance is 6 points. The court listened and then awarded him six points. The story doesn’t say if he’s been taken off the Register.

So, this bloke who made what appears to be a stupid mistake may well lose his entire livelihood. I’m again reminded of the little scumbag, Callum Lines, in a recent story who basically lost nothing by driving like a maniac – without a licence or insurance – to evade police who tried to stop him.

The lack of intelligence frequently demonstrated by English Law is truly staggering.

Kwik-Fit Insurance For Learners

Here’s a good idea. Kwik-Fit – the tyres and exhausts people – have just launched an insurance product specifically aimed at learners. It’s in partnership with Provisional Marmalade, who already specialise in this sort of thing.

Kwik-Fit Insurance managing director June Lynch said the policy has been designed to suit the short-term insurance requirements of learner drivers and runs alongside the main driver’s policy without any risk to their no claims discount.

So it doesn’t have any effect on the car owner’s insurance. I just wish they’d give some examples of how much typical costs would be.

Worth looking into if you are a learner who needs to get in some private practice.

Death By Careless Driving Driver Loses Appeal

Gordon William Dyche tried to overtake a two cars that were slowing down, with the front one signalling to turn right, ran into one of them, and shunted it into a reservoir. Four of the occupants died as a result (two of whom were only 14-years old). Dyche was “in a hurry” at the time.

Dyche was jailed for four years in August, but had appealed on the grounds that he was “treated too harshly”.

The appeal was rejected on the obvious grounds that no normal, safe driver would have tried to overtake a car that was slowing down and signalling – and that four people lost their lives as a result.

Quite right, too. And a perfect illustration of what being impatient and “in a rush” can do.

Driving Instructor “Said He Would Spank Pupil”

This story from Wales is quite disturbing. The case is ongoing, so I won’t make any personal judgements just yet.

Robert James Delabertouche is alleged to have told a female pupil that he would “put her over his knee and spank her”. He is also alleged to have regularly put his hand on her knee “to help her with clutch control”, and to have made “overly friendly comments”.

Delabertouche denies 10 charges of sexual assault against five women.

I suppose I’d better be careful when I joke with pupils that if they “do that again” I’ll make them walk home.

Update: Delabertouche was found guilty. He was cleared of two offences, but convicted of eight others. He is to be sentenced in January, and the judge reckons a community order or suspended sentence is likely.