Category - News

Further Nottingham Tram Fiasco Planned

I saw on the local news just now that shop owners in Chilwell and Beeston are worried that their businesses will collapse if Nottingham City Council closes two major roads.

Hilariously (and I mean in the circus clown sense), the Council has not informed traders of its plans, and these traders are worried that moves are afoot to close High Road and Chilwell Road in Beeston “for several months”.

During evening rush hour, it is already absolute chaos on the ring road as a result of University Boulevard being down to a single lane. All it takes is some dickhead breaking down or rear-ending another car and traffic comes to a complete standstill as there is nowhere else for it to go.

As I reported a few days ago – after the incompetent NET workers “overran” and caused total gridlock during morning rush hour – both NET and Nottingham City Council would be guilty of criminal incompetence if such a crime existed. Apparently, the loss to local businesses that day was in excess of £2,000,000! And numerous roads are already closed – many for “up to 12 months” – with others being shut all the time. There are restrictions and temporary lights everywhere, and not just from the tram works – the imbeciles in the City Council have also allowed unrestricted gas main and electricity service maintenance work to go ahead simultaneously with all this.

To make matters worse, the contractors involved in utilities road works now seem to favour 3-way and 4-way control, with the extended waits and increased queues this creates. And in some places the gas main work has been ongoing for 3 months or more (notably, on Westdale Lane and Cavendish Road in Carlton, with no end in site). The Council is apparently making no effort to get these idiot contractors to finish the work and get out of everyone’s way once and for all.

They’ve tried to blame the recent rain – well, in the case of the gas mains, if they’d have done their bloody jobs properly in the first place they wouldn’t be having to work in water-filled holes because they’d have packed up and moved on months ago. And I’m sure that NET and the Council have heard of weather forecasts, so it’s just a shame that they’re simply to stupid to adjust their work around heavy rain and so choose to create gridlock instead.

When you consider all of this, it is no wonder that Beeston and Chilwell traders are worried about what the Council intends to do. Total road closures in that area are absolutely likely with these idiots calling the shots. They don’t give a damn about road users or businesses – all they want is for their beloved tram extension to get built.

We’re in recession. Even if we’re technically out of recession (by about 0.0001% of growth), businesses are still closing by the shed load every day. Those traders in Chilwell and Beeston can’t afford to lose customers, otherwise it is absolutely guaranteed that they will go bankrupt. And Nottingham City Council is the only thing they can rely on.

God help them!

According to the BBC News, the Council says “disruption is inevitable”, but they are “trying to keep it to a minimum.” You can see the effects of this “minimum” every night – University Boulevard could easily have been kept as two-lanes, and the NET work could easily have been done faster and more competently. As things stand, absolutely nothing is being done to expedite the work (they weren’t working today, for example), and events like those last week are never far from the surface.

The BBC article interviewed Cllr Jane Urquhart. She looked like a terrified amateur being interviewed, and performed like one as well (all breathless and fast-talking):

We’re gong to maintain the maximum possible access… we’re continuing to have the discussions and work with our County Council highways colleagues and the tram project team…

I’m getting flashbacks again. That is bureaucratic bullshit. So far, they’ve done everything BUT maintain “maximum possible access”.In fact, much of the disruption looks almost deliberate – particularly when you consider the ridiculously long planned duration of it, and the total chaos every single night (and that’s no exaggeration). The Council should be TELLING their highways “colleagues” and the people they have EMPLOYED to build the tram what to do – not letting THEM call the shots and prattling on about “teams”.

As I’ve said before, the tram is a monumental and pointless waste of money. It isn’t green, and it isn’t pretty. The extra carbon emissions created by the traffic jams (especially the £2m cock-up last week) during construction will take decades to be offset – and that’s even assuming that there is any positive impact on emissions from the tram once it begins operating, which is unlikely (except in Council justification documents).

Elderly Maniacs – Something HAS To Be Done About Them

As you may know, I was pushing the Cassie’s Law e-petition while it was live. Cassie McCord was 16. She was killed in 2011 by an 87-year old driver who shouldn’t even have been allowed out unsupervised, let alone permitted to drive a car.

I’ve mentioned other examples of elderly drivers maiming or killing innocent people (you can read some of those in the links at the bottom of the Cassie story.

But two more have just come through. This one tells how a partially-sighted 87-year old, Peter Cole, killed another pensioner after driving into him. Following his arrest:

  • He could only read a car number plate from 7.75 metres, instead of the required 20 metres
  • After the crash he was seen trying to use his mobile phone using glasses and a magnifying glass, and had to hold the phone very close to his face
  • SpecSavers had strongly advised him as far back as 2009 not to drive anymore
  • A year later he told SpecSavers he didn’t drive anymore
  • He had applied for licences in 2004, 2007, and 2010 stating that he had no medical conditions relevant to them being granted
  • He was driving using a 10-inch piece of concrete to help him with the pedals
  • He had declined the option of cataract surgery

Fortunately, this idiot has been jailed for 18 months. His victim wasn’t so lucky and won’t get a second chance though. It’s all very well “being remorseful”, but he still killed someone through his own selfishness and stupidity.

This other story tells how a 90-year old mowed down a 24-year old pedestrian on a pavement, causing her to lose part of her leg. He was trying to do a u-turn when his built-up shoe got caught between the accelerator and brake and he shot on to the pavement at more than 20mph.

This one has got away with a £2,500 fine and a two year ban, though the judge has extended it indefinitely on the grounds that William Peto’s age and infirmity “render him a danger to the public”.

Many people of this age simply should not be on the roads in the first place. I know that will upset a lot of people out there, but it’s a simple fact. Far too many bleeding hearts put “mobility” above safety.

Banned Drivers Aged 11 And 12

This story is covered by various newspapers today, and reveals that out of 5,333 under-age drivers gaining convictions before they have a licence, five were aged 11 and 41 were aged 12.

At least one of the 12-year olds has received a life ban for aggravated vehicle theft and failing to provide a specimen for alcohol testing.

You can imagine the sort of person this little prat must be – but you can even more easily imagine what pond-scum his parents must be. The same goes for the parents of all the others.

And they think that this sort of behaviour can be addressed by driving instructors…!

RED Doesn’t Know What It’s Talking About

EDIT: I’ve changed the title to one that Red might not want showing up as No. 1 on my Popular Posts list on the left! I’ve noticed that this post has been deliberately forced to stay at the top by someone keep visiting it for several days, even though it is a pretty mundane story in itself. I suspect someone is after a bit of free advertising. (As soon as I did that, the visits stopped. Odd, eh?)

RED driving school has apparently “released” some “research” – but I really think someone needs to explain to them what “research” actually is in truly scientific terms.

As I’ve mentioned in several recent posts, it is Road Safety Week, and every organisation and his dog is anxious to climb aboard the band wagon and get some valuable publicity out of it. Some are making a better job of it than others.

Let’s just state some facts, here. Young drivers make up about 12% of the driving population, but they account for 33% of road fatalities. It is difficult to get positive spin out of that, no matter how much of a youth worker you think you are.

RED’s “research” amounts to a questionnaire put to 500 young drivers – quite possibly ones taught by RED instructors. The outcome is that a third (and that’s ONLY a third) think they have fewer bad habits than their parents and drive more in accordance with the Highway Code.

RED is clearly aided and abetted in mangling any statistics that might be involved by Kent Online, who have turned it into the banner headline: Young drivers `more careful than parents’.

To start with, that’s not what the “research” found. Having fewer bad habits and knowing more about the Highway Code does not make you a “more careful” driver. You get that label by having fewer accidents – and the fact I quoted above about road fatalities is far more significant in that respect.

And one-third of respondents answering one way is NOT a majority. It means that two-thirds – a sizable majority – DON’T think they are safer than their parents or know more about the Highway Code! This is obviously the correct interpretation of the “research”, and not the one RED or Kent Online is waffling about.

Ian McIntosh, CEO of RED Driving School said: “We thought it was important to ask young drivers, both learners and newly qualified, about their thoughts on how well they drive.”

Why? The only thing you’re going to show is how wrong they are. And you succeeded. He continues:

“It’s good to see that young drivers are confident in their driving ability and believe that, because they’re going through or have recently been through the driving tuition and test procedure, they’re better placed to drive safely and competently.”

He is on a different planet here. Confidence is what gets them into near-death situations in the first place. It is lack of experience that is the problem – yet he is obviously at pains to suggest they’ve had good tuition. Tuition is not the issue. But I like this part:

“We know that, overall, young drivers have a higher tendency to drive less safely…”

Well, that’s not what you or Kent Online has just tried to report, is it? You’ve just clouded the issue, which will make any changes to the law or testing system even more difficult to progress.

Teenage Yob Crashes Into House

Yet another case of a 17-year old who thinks he knows more than the rest of the human race – but who in actual fact was found to be sadly deficient in every possible area.

The teenage twat cannot be named for legal reasons. He was driving without a licence and without insurance. He failed to stop at the scene of an accident. It happened in Bucknall, Staffordshire.

The report says that he drove the car at high-speed, stalling about six times, drove on the wrong side of the road, and then crashed into a house (which was occupied).

He’s ben found guilty of dangerous driving – so the law seems to have worked. But the little prat has been granted unconditional bail until sentencing on 3 December. Oh, and he’s been banned from driving.

He should have been locked up to try to scare the crap out of him, because let’s face facts here: he isn’t going to get locked up on 3 December.

All the farting about trying to argue that driving instructors should be dealing with this sort of behaviour becomes laughable. This teenage moron probably isn’t taking lessons, and even if he was there is absolutely nothing an instructor can do to reverse such biological stupidity.

Warwickshire Police Advise On Flood Driving

Good advice from the Warwickshire Police in this article in the Leamington Spa Courier.

Basically, when driving through puddles and flooded roads which are still passable:

  • drive slowly and steadily
  • use first gear
  • use higher revs and slip the clutch
  • leave a large gap between you and the car in front

Water splashing on to electrical components in the car could cause it to cut out, so keeping the engine revving whilst slipping the clutch to keep speed low can avoid this risk. A large gap allows you to take evasive action if the car in front stops.

Most people will know what it’s like when you dive into a swimming pool and land flat. It hurts. Well, driving your car too fast into water has the same effect, on top of which you will create a wave which could soak the engine. It’ll cause you to slow down and the engine could stall – so don’t try and barge through. It just won’t work.

If a sign tells you a road is closed, don’t be a prat and try and get through. It’s closed for a reason.

And don’t immediately accelerate once you’ve gone through water. Test your brakes.

Nottingham Tram Works – A Case Of Criminal Incompetence!

If there was ever such a thing as criminal incompetence, the entire staff of both Nottingham City Council and NET (the idiots who run Nottingham’s tram) would be guilty of it.

I woke up this morning to find the city gridlocked. And I mean GRIDLOCKED. Traffic was at a standstill everywhere.

I had a 9am appointment at the Queens Medical Centre following a two-month Deliberate Delayswait for a GP referral slot. I tried to get there, but a journey which would normally have taken 10 minutes had to be aborted after only managing to travel less than 1 mile in 45 minutes. To make matters worse, when I called the NHS – which has to run the City Council and NET a close second for stupidity – I was told they couldn’t access my records without a password (so I couldn’t even tell them I was sorry that I couldn’t get in), and that this should have been provided with my referral letter from my GP. I explained I didn’t get a referral letter, and that the GP had done it directly, and was told that my surgery would be able to provide it. Of course, when I phoned my surgery the only person with access to the password system was stuck in the bloody traffic!

It turned out to be almost entirely the fault of tram works, which had “over run” – a euphemistic description for yet another total and incompetent balls up by NET workers.

This meant that University Boulevard – already down to one lane at the best of times – was closed. And it was topped off by some wanker over-turning their car on whatTemporary Lights for utilities works appears to have been a 30mph road (listening to the traffic reports) near Wilford. All of this was before, during, and after the rush hour.

I tried every possible route to get to the QMC, but gave up in the city centre. The gridlock extended as far south as Bunny on the A60. And the icing on the cake was that all the usual rat runs I know were also snarled up with people trying to bypass the mess – which in itself was made all the more worse by the numerous utilities road works which the idiot council has allowed to take place simultaneously both with each other and the tram works. As I’ve said previously, the tram works already involve numerous semi-permanent or long-term road closures. It took me nearly two hours to get back home again.

While we’re on the subject, I noticed several ambulances stuck also trying to get to A&E and the QMC. I hope anyone who was lying in the back considers suing the council and NET back to the Stone Age. And the police ought to be doing something about it now – it’s gone beyond a joke. It really is becoming a case of criminal stupidity.

Teenager Dies In Crash On Rural Road

Another sad story involving the death of a teenager who only passed her test a few weeks earlier.

There are no specific details, and police are calling for witnesses, but 18-year-old Hannah Lodge crashed into a telegraph pole on a B-road. It happened during daylight and no passengers were mentioned, but other than that it appears to be yet another “rural road, no one else involved” scenario acted out – with tragic consequences.

An update following the inquest can be found here.

It appears that although the driver was at fault for the accident, the telegraph pole and weather station pole are being blamed simply for being there. The argument is that if they hadn’t been, the crash might have had a different outcome.

We live in a strange world.

New Driver Restrictions – Update

The London Evening Standard has its own story on the proposed restrictions for new drivers.

Its says that three-quarters of the public think new drivers should face restrictions after passing their tests. Three quarters also agreed that there should be restrictions on carrying passengers.

Over half believe that there should be a minimum 12-month learning period before they can take their driving test., and similar numbers support a late-night curfew and think the driving test itself should change.

Nearly half of all 17-year old males have accidents within their first six months of driving.

Meanwhile, the bleeding hearts out there continue to oppose the suggestions as being unenforceable, and as being detrimental to the lifestyles of the little darlings whose lifestyles are such that they want to go out and kill themselves in their cars.

This ITV link gives some useful information linking to a variety of sources.

More 20mph Piffle

Soapbox WarsAnother “charity” vying for soapbox space during Road Safety Week is clamouring for more 20mph speed limits to be imposed. This one is in Wales, but that doesn’t make their claims any more relevant.

I normally have a lot of respect for what BRAKE has to say, but not with nonsense like this.

That’s because there is no evidence that 20mph limits actually cut accidents, but a fair bit which suggests otherwise.

The whole kerfuffle is yet another echo of the bloody Olympics, and put forward by a bunch of Bradley fanboys. BRAKE reckons that “a UK-wide survey of 8,000 children shows 70% of youngsters would be able to walk and cycle more if roads in their neighbourhoods were safer.” Conclusive scientific evidence, as you can see.

A BRAKE spokesman goes on to say:

Everyone in Wales should be able to walk and cycle in their community without fear or threat: it’s a basic right, and GO 20 is about defending that.

The 2012 (Olympic) Games helped us all realise the importance of being able to live active lifestyles. Critical to this is making our streets and communities safe places we can use and enjoy.

Unless you ban cars from roads completely, encouraging people – and especially children – to go on them is just asking for trouble.

They’ve even got some pseudo-scientist spouting nonsense to support their claims:

Dr Catherine Purcell, of the Dyscovery Centre, University of Wales, Newport, has found children find it difficult to judge speed once it rises over 20mph.

Also her latest research has shown that children with learning difficulties like dyspraxia, dyscalculia and autism find it particularly difficult.

Of course, there are places where cars are already banned – we call them “cycle routes” – and if people used those instead of major dual carriageways then there’d be fewer accidents. And similarly, if kids were taught to ride bikes and use roads as pedestrians properly, instead of blindly walking out because they’re hunched over their iPods or phones, even they would be a whole lot safer.

And just get over the bloody Olympics.