THIS Is Why Young Drivers Have Accidents

This is an old post. But it is still absolutely true.

In a long-overdue update – I didn’t follow the story at the time, but it was visited by a search in 2022 – Tennant was unbelievably cleared of causing his girlfriend’s death!

This story from Edinburgh illustrates clearly the absolute Number One reason many young drivers have accidents, which are often fatal.

Euan Tennant was a learner driver. He had taken “around ten” driving lessons, but never passed his test. He then went out and bought a two-litre sports car.

It was a calculated decision on his part to do this. It wasn’t like he forgot to pass his test. That he overlooked it. He knew full well what he was doing.

He had driven around 1,500 miles in the car with his 22-year old girlfriend as his supervising driver (allegedly – we must assume that she had passed her test more than 3 years previously, and that Tennant was always accompanied when he went out). He reckons she’d never told him to slow down in all that time. This version of the story says that Tennant had only owned the car “for a few weeks”, so he did well to rack up 1,500 miles in such a short time – it can take me 2-3 weeks to do that, and I’m a very heavy user!

On this one trip, Tennant lost control on a bend (the old story), Laura Campbell had to be cut from the wreckage and died a few hours later in hospital.

CCTV footage shows a speeding car, which Tennant admitted “could have been him”. He also admits overtaking another car shortly before the accident. He claims he was not speeding on the bend and that there was “something on the road surface” that made him lose control.

Just for the record, if you’re driving at a safe speed on a bend, you do not lose control and have to have your passengers cut out of the mangled wreck – even if the road does have “something on it”.

The police could find nothing on the road surface, and believe that excessive speed was the cause.

Tennant claims to have been doing 40-45mph when he lost control.

The case is ongoing, but the fact that a juvenile mind is prepared to behave in such a juvenile way – with such appalling results – is precisely why young people have accidents. It isn’t their training. It is their attitudes.

Tennant is expressing all sorts of remorse.

The fact is: he made the decision to buy a sports car with sound mind clear conscience, and hopelessly inadequate driving skills knowing he was still a beginner. And now he needs to face the music.

EDIT: And this is why young drivers will continue to have fatal crashes, because there’s no deterrent. Tennant was cleared on the grounds that the case against him was not proven. I take back a lot of what I’ve said about Scottish law making better decisions than the law in England.

I’d just point out that Laura Campbell is still dead. And Tennant was still highly inexperienced, and driving a car hopelessly too fast for his poor driving skills.

Laura’s parents understandably feel “let down” by the verdict.

Top Gear Faking. Again.

ScammerTop Gear – the BBC programme about cars, hosted by chimpanzees, and avidly watched by pond life (my opinion, of course) – has had its fair share of rows about whether some of its stunts are real or not.

The latest one comes after the producers admitted that they set up a traffic jam and used driving instructors posing as learners.

The instructors pretended to be practising reverse parking in close proximity to each other, while James May was held up in his Ferrari California Spider (worth £5.6m).

Personally, I don’t really care if Top Gear fakes its stuff or not. Real or pretend, it conveys the wrong image to people of limited intelligence in the first place.

But I’m surprised – well, not that surprised – at driving instructors prepared to push the image of learners being a nuisance in order to appear on the show. I guess that we shouldn’t forget that there are plenty of driving instructors out there whose only interest in life is cars, and the announcement of a new series of Top Gear is enough to cause them to wet themselves.

Appearing on it would be like having sex for them (albeit, without any other organic  life form being involved). I wonder if they got paid?

Thatcher II: The Return Of The Nightmare

I saw this in today’s newspapers. David Cameron – leader of this Mickey Mouse coalition we have to endure – is considering privatising the road network and introducing tolls.

Somehow, he believes that charging people more money in taxes (that’s what it would be) will kick-start the economy.

Amusingly, he says:

There’s nothing green about a traffic jam – and gridlock holds the economy back.

Yes. Well perhaps he should aim to cut back on the chaos caused by roadworks – specifically, the fact that even repairing a single cracked paving stone can involve advanced warnings of delays, three-way temporary lights, and total nightmare journey times for the month the work continues.

Or maybe the local councils’ unending quest to create the perfect bus stop or pedestrian crossing, putting in chicanes, taking out chicanes, speed bumps, light-controlled crossings, and so on. And let’s not forget trams in cities too small to accommodate them, so that tens of thousands of motorists can be held up to let trams carrying up to a hundred people at a time pass through.

If he considered those things, then maybe it wouldn’t be so painfully obvious he is clueless with this sort of nonsense:

Mr Cameron claimed that congestion on roads costs the UK economy £7bn a year.

Cameron says that the solution was to shift more people and goods on to the rail network. As I’ve said before, the man is not of this world.

The problem isn’t specifically congestion – it’s what causes that congestion.

Apart from roadworks, it is broken down cars, accidents, and the school runs. Those cause untold delays every single day – and all you have to do is consider how easy it can be in rush hour in many cities when it is half-term to figure that last one out.

And you can wave bye-bye to any greenbelt if this version is anything to go by:

New roads constructed from scratch by private investors, meanwhile, could become French-style toll roads.

Anyone who voted for these clowns only has themselves to blame.

Australian Learners Drive Time

This is an interesting one – I’m still split over it.

In New South Wales, Australia, learner drivers have to complete a log book during their training. They have to do 120 hours of driving, which has to be signed off (but not even by an instructor, as I understand).

The current Road Minister, Duncan Gay, says:

“For too long governments have taken the opportunity, if there’s an accident somewhere, to automatically add extra hours to the learner’s permit time.”

Now, in part I agree with that. Accidents among young drivers are not due to inadequate tuition. But it is also a dig at the previous government – so you immediately wonder what point Gay is making. Is he genuinely of the belief that accidents are unfairly blamed on learner tuition and learners per se, or is he simply making vote-winning small talk?

Referring to the change – where learners will be able to knock 20 hours off their required driving hours if they take a driving safety course (which is non-compulsory), he then adds:

“(This) stops parents and children currently becoming criminals because 120 hours is just way too much.”

Mr Gay said he hoped the initiative would deliver a more realistic timeframe for L-platers and stop the some of them from fudging log books.

Ah! So instead of actually dealing with the problem (the accidents), his party is simply going for one of the symptoms – which, coincidentally, will be popular among some of the electorate. They want to move the goalposts for what constitutes “criminal behaviour” instead of dealing with the fact that people are simply happy to behave as criminals.

Not a good sign for the future, Mr Gay.

To make matters worse, the course learners can go on to cut those 20 hours is not free (Gay says they will be “affordable”) – and they will even be able to cut another 20 hours if they take “professional” courses. I’m sure that those will be even more “affordable”.

I think the real attitude to driving is summed up in the next paragraph:

“Further options to assist learner licence holders in remote, lower socio-economic… communities meet learner driver log book hours will also be considered,” Mr Gay said.

Votes, votes, votes. What on earth is the point of arguing that safety isn’t implicated by cutting driving hours, when you’re immediately going to make concession upon concession for minority groups? It is the poorer people who are both prepared to break the law, and financially inclined to do it – and their societal attitude certainly doesn’t push them towards being safe drivers.

Looks like the Aussies have the same problems with government involvement in driver training that the UK does. I wonder if Mr Gay gets his information from his daughter, like our transport minister does?

Incidentally, the proposed changes are reported slightly differently depending on where you look.

But There IS A Recession On…

 

Hot on the heels of that last article, this one quotes a breakdown recovery company (also an insurer), who say that drivers are delaying servicing and repairs to cut their expenditure. Apparently, this is the outcome of “research” again.

No, really?

It says that 25% of motorists have a fault which makes the car illegal, and 14% say it urgently needs repair. Common faults include:

  • faulty brakes
  • faulty wipers
  • broken or missing mirrors
  • defective brake lights

Around 20% admit to driving without an MOT – which they point out is an offence. It seems there is no end to these statements of the obvious.

The article says that drivers “now” take over four months to fix faults, on average. It doesn’t say what this figure was previously, although it does seem to consider that just because people “say” it is due to cost, then this must be a brand new reason – rather than a new excuse.

Let’s Pretend There’s A Problem…

I love this on Yahoo! News. They have a story on “tips for Easter driving” from a certain car loans company. The advice amounts to this (from the company’s co-director):

“Older cars can be particularly vulnerable to breakdown when sat in traffic on busy motorways so anyone driving an older vehicle, or a car that they have not had serviced for a while, should certainly follow our tips for having a hassle free Easter getaway.

“Of course, for those who are not going anywhere in their cars this Easter because they simply think their car is too unreliable and prone to breakdown, it is worth remembering that there are some great car finance deals [link to own company website here] available at the moment for buying a new car and prices are more affordable than you may think.”

It then talks about car loans, with a further link to the company’s own website.

Oh, wait!. There ARE some tips. These are:

  • check your tyres
  • check your battery and lights
  • check your windscreen
  • check your oil
  • think about breakdown cover
  • buy a new car [link to company’s website again]

I’ve recently accepted a sponsored article on the blog. Basically, an advertiser provides an article with a link back to their website, which I publish for them and provide a link to it on the blog homepage for an agreed period of time. It’s clear that Yahoo! may well have done something very similar by allowing such blatant advertising to go under the guise of “news”. If they did, I bet they charged more than I did, though.

As for the “advice”… well, it could have been lifted from anywhere (the AA for example). It is public domain common sense that applies all through the year, with some bad marketeering very conspicuously tacked on the end.

Councils, Utilities… Roadworks

Well, it’s started. The annual roadworks fiesta – which will last all summer – has begun now that the weather has turned nice.

Episode 1

In Nottingham, for some incomprehensible reason the council has allowed the contractor Morrison to dig up Woodborough Road (between The Wells Road and Porchester Road), and keep it dug up for 3 weeks and counting. It features a “three-way traffic control”, which translates to 5 minute waits for a handful of cars to get through each way. However,  these temporary lights don’t take accDelays Possible Signount of the normal Porchester Road set less than 50m away – it would be too simple to synchronise with them, wouldn’t it? – and that means people backed up into the yellow box junction (if they’re prats, causing delays on Porchester Road) or long delays (everywhere else, if they stay out of it).

Morrison appear to be in no hurry whatsoever to get any work done. No matter what time of day you drive through it is quite likely you’ll see no one even present to do any work, let alone do it efficiently. At best, they’re sitting in vans stuffing their faces from one of the numerous nearby greasy spoon or fast food establishments.

They are NOT working evenings, and they are NOT working every weekend. Typically, they’re also NOT working much before 10am or after about 3-4pm, and the short space in between  has lengthy elevenses, lunch, and afternoon tea breaks tucked into it.

It’s got something to do with the gas – new pipes being laid – but thTraffic lights warning signe work ethic is appallingly bad. Let’s hope the quality of the work is a little better, otherwise I might suddenly find myself in Colwick when I thought I was intending to go towards Sherwood!

The traffic delays caused by these works are massive – so massive that it is obvious that there is deliberate intent on the part of someone at either the council or the contractor (or both).

It’s sheer incompetence all round. Once upon a time, this sort of job would have been completed in just a few days. Now, it takes a month or more. (COMPLETED)

Episode 2

If you’re coming the opposite way, from Arnold, Plains Road (before it becomes Woodborough Road) has got a set of temporary lights. They’re less than a mile from the ones I just described. They’re resurfacing a 200m stretch of road, and they’ve been doing it for well over a week so far. Years ago, that amount of resurfacing would have been done over a single night. (COMPLETED)

Episode 3

Of course, when you know about this kind of incompetence you look for alternative routes. Temporary Traffic LightsDepending on which way you’re heading that could mean using Westdale Lane. I tried that yesterday and discovered another set of temporary lights specifically designed to cause delays. They were on the road near a building site where someone has sold a few square metres of land on to which at least two structures – probably pauper flats – are being built. Utilities again.

House builders have just about the lowest right to block traffic out of anyone, in my opinion. They are the only people who will benefit from their house-building – absolutely no one passing by will. They’re just forced to endure huge delays while the usual leisurely British approach to doing any work manifests itself.

Again, they used to be able to build houses very quickly. It now takes much longer – meaning roadworks for the installation of utilities last far too long.

The whole business is like a military operation. EVERY route is impeded. There is no sensible alternate route you can use to bypass the area. (COMPLETED)

Episode 4

Closed RoadsIf you have any lessons or business across the other side of the city, think again if you expect a clearer run. On Broxtowe Lane there are yet more utilities works, with temporary lights, characterised by no one actually doing any work for most of the day. It’s fun and games during the school run, given that there are about six schools within a 2-mile radius (not to mention the fact that we’re talking about Broxtowe, here).

Episode 5

West Bridgford also has a carefully placed set of 3-way temporary lights on Musters Road at the junction with Eton Road. This particular site is characterised by absolutely NO ONE doing any work whatsoever since the hole was dug two weeks ago. It’s perfectly situated to cause maximum inconvenience to motorists – particularly as there is a school about 500m away, which is frequented by a lot of typical West Bridgford mummies and daddies involved in the school run (i.e. bad drivers, big cars, usually going to Asda or one of the Diversions and restricted accessWest Bridgford car parks once they’ve dropped off or picked up their kids, etc.). Late afternoon is chaos.

Episode 6

Out of town is no good, either. On a longer run through Ravenshead, there are utilities works (and temporary lights) along Longdale Lane. These are dismantled at weekends (well, they were last week) and only erected weekdays, so there’s no desperate hurry to complete the work. The only purpose of the lights appears to keep the workers the correct Health & Safety-approved distance away from traffic in the brief periods during which they are working.

Episode 7

The Bunny-East Leake/Gotham road is completely closed. Alternative route to Gotham is via Costock and East Leake.

Forthcoming Attractions

Yellow signs giving advanced warning of works are also going up in various places. I love the wording, and how it says “delays possible” or “delays expected”.

In other words, “we’re going to make sure you ARE delayed – and for as many weeks as we possibly can”. God help us when they start building that waste-of-space tram extension to Beeston. That’ll last a year!

Basaar Spice Blend

The brand I use these days – King of Spice

Someone found the blog on the search term “basaar from pakistan to use in curries do it go old”. I mention Kashmiri Basaar in my curry recipe.

All spices deteriorate with age. At best, they lose their aromatic qualities. At worst, they go mouldy (I discovered that with some whole cumin seeds recently – admittedly, they were about 2 years old and stuck at the back of a cupboard).

Spice blends are no exception. If you make your own blends, they are best after a few weeks, and good for a few months. But they do gradually go downhill. Commercial blends are just the same, and unless you use a lot of the stuff it isn’t a good idea to buy the really big bags.

I would imagine that a blend brought over directly from Pakistan (or any other country) would not have the same quality control associated with its preparation, and this could easily lead to a poorer shelf-life than commercial blends.

It also reminds me of something that happened to me some years ago.

I was working in Pakistan one time and I brought back a huge bag of pistachios. I used to take them to the squash club to share out. Their freshness noticeably deteriorated over several weeks – one of the drawbacks to buying stuff in bulk. When you were eating them, they had a sort of dust covering the nut.

It was a hot summer in the UK, and I’d transferred these pistachios to smaller bags. I’d noticed a lot of small moths in the house, but I put it down to the weather. But one time at the squash club, I put a pistachio in my mouth and felt something cold on my lip. I spat it out and noticed a fair-sized caterpillar!

I had a thought, and when I got home I looked at the bags of nuts. They were crawling with caterpillars and moths – a few escapees were what I’d been seeing around the house. It turned out the “dust” covering the nuts was moth eggs.

There’s no harm using a spice mix you’ve brought over from Pakistan, but if it doesn’t taste right then bin it and buy some more.

Baby-Boomers Now An Increased Risk

Just for information, the term baby-boomers refers to people who were born post-war between about 1946 and 1964. That would make them between 47 and 66 as of today.

This story, submitted by a reader, reports that the UK population is getting older and an increasing number of cars are being driven by the over-65s. At the moment, around 15% of the population is over 65, but this is predicted to rise to around 25% by 2050.

A parliamentary committee is suggesting in a report that older drivers could be sent on courses.

Frighteningly, in 1975 only 15% of the over-70s had driving licences. In 2010 it stood at 60%. The story adds:

Older drivers are over-represented in multi-vehicle crashes, suggesting that they have difficulty interacting with other road users.

This is almost the exact wording used in that Young Drivers Risk & Rurality report I mentioned recently. It would seem that if you select the appropriate reports, every single person in the UK Is “over-represented” one way or another when it comes to crap driving!

Young drivers often think they know it all, when simple logic clearly dictates that they don’t – because they simply cannot, due to lack of experience. Older drivers might be a lot closer to knowing it all, but whether they can recall it at the right time or not is another matter entirely.

Amusingly, the story mentions that over-70s just have to fill a form in saying they’re safe to drive and bingo! – here’s a new licence. The parliamentary report…

…says there needs to be urgent research into whether this is working…

Of course it isn’t bloody working! You’d have to be an idiot to think that self-certification isn’t going to be abused the second you let it loose.

The AA believes that any extra training should be voluntary and not mandatory. I disagree with that. The AA says:

If there was a compulsory course or testing people might worry unnecessarily and be unwilling to go through it, so they would lose their mobility.

OK. So let them carry on lying just to retain their “mobility” – and don’t worry too much when things like this happen (Cassie’s Law still needs signatures, by the way). By all means put greater value on an old person’s wheels than on the life of a teenager – but close the door on your way out!

There should be mandatory testing of ANY at-risk group or individual.

As people are fond of saying, a driving licence is a privilege, not a right. But it would appear that this doesn’t apply to old people, for whom a driving licence is increasingly turning into an absolute right.

Dangerous Tossers

Two examples of extremely dangerous driving yesterday. Both were easily capable of causing fatal accidents, involving crass stupidity.

FD10 NFX - Black MercedesThe first involved a black Mercedes *reg. no. FD10 NFX). I was driving along the A60 towards Bunny during the rush hour, and just as I approached Bradmore Lane (locally known as “The Rollercoaster”, and favoured by pratmobile drivers as a location for risking their lives and everyone else’s) this Mercedes was waiting. He had absolutely no right of way, nor any reasonable reason to pull out.

But he did.

Amusingly, he made sure to keep his eyes below the level of the mirror once he saw me mouth something that rhymed with “clucking bat” at him and point to my head. They’re always very brave before they do it, but no so afterwards. He was heading off towards Loughborough somewhere, in case the police are interested.

W498 BVX - Dark SeatThe second example was driving towards Cotgrave along Cotgrave Road/Plumtree Road. Just as the speed limit goes from 40mph to 60mph, I saw this commotion behind as the juvenile twat driving the dark-coloured Seat (reg, no. W498 BVX) had apparently overtaken a van to squeeze in the gap in front.

I had accelerated to almost 60mph by this time, and there were solid white lines on the road due to dips and bends. That didn’t stop the Seat driver though. He overtook me on solid white lines at considerably above 70mph – having to take evasive action to avoid the oncoming car (that’s why the solid white lines are there, you prick). I think this may have just shaken him a little, as he didn’t try to overtake the car he was then stuck behind. I don’t know if he could see me using Universal Sign Language behind him at the junction, because he was invisible in the mirror and below the level of the driving seat back rest (typical child pratmobile driver – restricted height, restricted intelligence, car modified so he can’t even see over the steering wheel – but drives suicidally nonetheless.

He headed off towards the centre of Cotgrave if the police are interested, though he could easily have been using it as a rat run to the A46.

It’s no wonder young drivers have fatalities, is it? What is a wonder is that anyone should feel sympathy for them when they do.