Useless And Inaccurate Award

I don’t want to take too much away from the driving school involved, but I find it hard to believe that a small firm in Bristol can be reliably considered as “third best driving school in the UK”.

Apparently, “tens of thousands” of people voted across the country (which has a population of 62 million), so even if those tens of thousands amounted to 99,999, they still only represent 0.16% of the population. I suspect we’re talking about the lower “tens” here, even so.

These opinion-based polls are notoriously unreliable and horrendously misleading – every year, the media ask people to vote for the Best Band Ever In All Recorded History, and you can guarantee that the worst pop and rap claptrap from the previous year comes up trumps. That’s purely down to the kind of people who vote.

Good luck to the school involved. It’s a nice certificate to have.

But I wouldn’t put too much emphasis on “third best in the UK”. That’s absolute nonsense, and would require every learner in the country from the last 5 years to vote for it to be even close to having any validity.

It’ll be interesting to see if any of the other local amateur newspapers jump on the first and second placed driving schools when they find out who they are.

Maintaining A Car On A Budget

SPONSORED ARTICLE

Driving on a budgetBuying a car can be one of the most expensive purchases you make (after buying a home) – and it’s not just the initial cost you’ll pay in the showroom that could squeeze your finances.

There are so many expenses that have to be budgeted for when running a car – from petrol and road tax, to regular MOTs, insurance and any repairs or spare parts you’ll have to pay for as time goes on.

In the current climate, when many of us are feeling the squeeze on our monthly budgets more tightly than ever before, handling all the costs of running a car throughout the year won’t be an easy ride for many of us.

An expert from debt management company GregoryPennington.co.uk says: "With the rising fuel prices we’ve seen in recent years, budgeting for the cost of running your car can be a real challenge. However, there are approaches you could take to cut down on your fuel bills and take some pressure off your monthly finances."

Let’s take a look at a few ways you could help to keep the cost of maintaining your car down – so your fuel bills won’t drive you off the road.

Tips for running your car on a budget

You could make running your car more cost-effective by:

  1. Always staying within the speed limit. Along with making you a safe(r), law-abiding citizen (and reducing the likelihood of you getting a speeding ticket!), this good driving habit could seriously help you reduce the amount of fuel you use.
  2. Getting rid of any unnecessary clutter in your car, whether that means ditching that never-used roof rack or taking heavy items out of the boot. This will stop your engine having to do more work – which means you shouldn’t have to refill your tank so often.
  3. Maintaining your car well and getting it serviced on a regular basis. You could save a lot more than you think (in petrol and repairs) by keeping your car in good working condition – checking the tyre pressure, keeping the brake fluid topped up, keeping an eye on your engine, etc.
  4. Not using the air conditioning too frequently, as it will add to your petrol consumption and lead to increased running costs. How often would opening the window have much the same effect as turning on the AC?
  5. Making a note of the cheapest petrol stations in your local area – and stopping at them when you drive past, rather than going out just to fill up.

If you’re regularly struggling to afford all your monthly costs, and you’re repaying unsecured debts, you could have an underlying debt problem that needs to be sorted out – in which case taking steps like these might well not be enough to sort your finances out.

Getting professional debt advice could point you in the direction of the debt help you need – you may be recommended a debt management plan or another debt solution that could help you solve your debt problem.

Annual Statement Of The Bleeding Obvious – Contender #1

When I read this report, which says that using a smartphone while driving can be more The Bleeding Obvious Awards 2012dangerous than drinking alcohol or using cannabis, I slapped my head and thought what a fool I’d been for not realising this for myself after all these years.

Not.

Apparently, it needed “research” by some comedians calling themselves the Institute of Advanced Motorists (IAM) in order for this hitherto “unknown” fact to come to light.

I wish they’d stop calling these things “studies” and “research”. They are neither – not by a long way. It’s just some old geezer with absolutely nothing better to do stating the bloody obvious after reading something in Time, Readers Digest, or Saga Magazine.

THEY might not have known it, but I would imagine that most of the higher primates did. Jeez, even my cat knew.

What makes it worse is that the Americans have been having hysterics over this very subject for the past 12 months, and have done most of the “research” themselves (it’s not so bad when Americans do it, because it’s only what you’d expect), so the IAM can hardly claim to have “discovered” anything.

Yes, arseing about with your radio, mobile phone, music collection, laptop, TV, toaster, microwave oven, building Lego models, solving the Rubik’s Cube, or any other activity which takes your attention off the road is dangerous and stupid. It always has been, and always will be.

It’s like saying that you mustn’t put your hand in a running Flymo – but only after “research” – and then pretending no one knew up until then that it was stupid and dangerous.

This is currently top contender for the 2012 Statement Of The Bleeding Obvious awards.

THINK! Biker

An email alert from the DSA mentions a £1.2m ad campaign by THINK! urging people to think and take care around motorcyclists.

Motorcyclists doing what you have a motorbike for in the first placeOne very important piece of missing advice is that motorcyclists also ought to take care and think – they’re often not entirely blameless for the scrapes they get into.

Weaving in an out of cars at traffic lights, almost invariably going either too fast for the conditions or speed limit, accelerating “just because you can”, and so on when you’re already a very fragile moving target isn’t the most intelligent way of behaving.

I am 100% behind the idea of motorists – or anyone on the roads – taking care around motorcyclists. I mean, I wouldn’t like to prang one, even if it wasn’t my fault.

However, I am not convinced that motorists should continue to be forced to shoulder quite so much of the responsibility. It is all too often the stupidity of the motorcyclist that’s the real underlying problem.

Perhaps THINK! should “think” about dealing with the problem at source, rather than keep trying to patch things up elsewhere?

Unpleasant Flashbacks!

Brrrrrr! That was nasty! Someone found the blog on the search term “daily team meeting diary”, and I broke out into a cold sweat! Meetings, bloody meetings! And daily ones!

Daily team meetings – one of the reasons why we’re in a recession. People wasting their time on pointless get-togethers in the mistaken belief Daily Team Meetingsthat it in any way improves productivity.

A daily meeting is bad enough. Add the word “team” and it becomes a hundred times worse. And when some comedian wants to spend money on a physical diary to plan the bloody things, you realise that the company in question hasn’t got a hope in hell of surviving long.

For one thing, why would you want a diary for something that happens every day? OK, the people who go for these things are probably too stupid even to remember a daily appointment, but you can see the problem.

But going one step further, can you imagine the wasted time involved each day if they’re going so far as to have a written agenda for each one, and someone apparently has to write down what they need to cover at the following day’s meeting, as well as do the minutes for the previous one?

Assuming they haven’t got a secretary recruited for the specific purpose of managing daily meetings (which would be a ridiculous waste of manpower), the ones they do have will be complaining like mad about having to administer the minutes, the agendas, and all the inevitable changes you get even for an ad hoc meeting, let alone a frequent one, with the corrections, discussions, and arguments they create. And that will be on top of the secretary’s normal workload.

The usual extra activity that results from any meeting is bad enough – they typically involve new ideas and changes of direction – but having this happen on a daily basis automatically means whatever was discussed and agreed the day before is frequently going to have been totally pointless. And if there is no change of direction, why have the meeting?

How can anyone remain in business by being so stupid?

Mind you, having slept on on it, I thought of a few other things. You see, people ARE that stupid – too stupid to realise that a simple page-a-day diary is all they would need if they really MUST have a special diary for daily team meetings. Then it occurred to me that page-a-day diaries are only available in A4 and A5 sizes, and that there must be a huge potential market out there for A3 and larger sizes.

What a fantastic entrepreneurial business idea: A0-sized Daily Team Meeting Diaries.

There are people out there who would wet themselves to get one!

Driving Instructor Fined – But Gets Off

From the Bournemouth Daily Echo via the newsfeeds, a driving instructor was “stunned” to get a £70 fine after his pupil stopped on the reverse round a corner exercise to let a car pass. The car turned out to be a Poole Council Camera Car.

Catalina DriveThe instructor claims his pupil was acting properly – and on the surface of it, that seems to be the case. However, the council mentions a bus stop in its version.

If you look up the road that the instructor was using via Google (Catalina Drive), you can clearly see that just in front of the corner apparently being used there IS indeed a bus stop (and yellow lines all around the bend). It would be necessary for the car to stop inside this bus stop bay in order to commence the manoeuvre – quite a long way inside if the manoeuvre was being done in usual learner fashion (i.e. 2-3 car lengths ahead of the bend).

Poole Council’s website – specifically its guidelines about issuing PCNs (penalty charge notices) – say:

CONTRAVENTION CODE: 47

Stopped on a restricted bus stop or stand

This code is used when a vehicle other than a bus parks in a restricted bus
stop. Only buses may stop in the marked area.

Coaches may also stop to pick up and set down passengers but not to park
awaiting passengers.

No loading/unloading is permitted.

The instructor in question can argue all he likes, and claim to know all the rules (which is exactly what he does), but the council’s rule is quite clear. If you stop in a bus stop area you are liable for a fine.

He is lucky that they got the road name wrong on his PCN – so he got off on a technicality. Otherwise, he would have had to pay or appeal.

I don’t have much time for council snooping, and in situations like this then maybe Poole Council ought to exercise a little more discretion, since a lot of motorists must get away with stopping for the few seconds it takes to turn around when the camera car isn’t around. But if they don’t show discretion, they don’t, simple as that. And people have to live with it.

The local PCN rules are crystal clear and the ADI obviously didn’t know them as well he he thought he did. Whatever city you live in, you need to make sure you know what the local council will allow, and what it will stamp on. For example, some will let you use bus lanes to get past cars which are turning right, whereas others will fine you instantly for doing the same.

It isn’t illegal to stop at a bus stop – but the Highway Code says you shouldn’t. PCNs are civil and not criminal affairs, in any case. And for those people who only like to quote part of the Highway Code, here’s the bit they keep forgetting (note the highlighted part):

240

You MUST NOT stop or park on:

  • the carriageway or the hard shoulder of a motorway except in an emergency (see Rule 270)
  • a pedestrian crossing, including the area marked by the zig-zag lines (see Rule 191)
  • a clearway (see ‘Traffic signs’)
  • taxi bays as indicated by upright signs and markings
  • an urban clearway within its hours of operation, even when a broken white line is on your side of the road, except to pick up or set down passengers (see ‘Traffic signs’)
  • a road marked with double white lines, except to pick up or set down passengers
  • a tram or cycle lane during its period of operation
  • a cycle track
  • red lines, in the case of specially designated ‘red routes’, unless otherwise indicated by signs

Any vehicle may enter a bus lane to stop, load or unload where this is not prohibited (see Rule 141).

This whole affair is between this ADI and Poole Council (and it’s enforcement policies) – was the bus stop in question “restricted”? There is no single nationwide answer.

But you have to ask: where’s the bus going to go if it turns up and there is a learner arseing about in the bay?

An ADI ought be able to work that one out for themselves.

CGI HPT – Impressive

An email alert has just come through from the DSA with a link to some early-stage computer generated imagery (CGI) clips they’re working on for the Hazard Perception Test (HPT).

I can see this one dragging the rats out of the sewers (at the time of writing, ten votes, three of them negative on the YouTube site).

The quality is very impressive.

Some of the negative comments seem to have completely overlooked the fact that these are EARLY-STAGE clips, and not the finished article. That’s why there’s no sound.

 

Clip #1

 

Clip #2

As the DSA says in the email:

The clips are early prototypes. DSA aims to bring these computer-generated clips into the theory test by the end of 2013. It means DSA can introduce hazards that would be hard to film safely – particularly those involving vulnerable road users.

It’s a brilliant idea. Just a shame that technology moves forward faster than the thinking of some ADIs.

Looking at some of the comments, one thing that is repeatedly overlooked by those who are anti-HPT from the outset and saying that it should be done in a real car is that it IS done in a real car – the HPT is only one small part of the training a learner receives, and much of that training IS in the car. It happens during their lessons!

Others are totally ignoring the fact that these are merely samples – very early samples, at that. The DSA is asking for feedback, and comments about overtaking the cyclist too close to a roundabout or not adhering to the 2 second rule are precisely the sort of feedback they want and need.

ADIs need to help make the clips better – not just poo-poo the whole idea. The level of reality is already quite stunning, and by the time they come into proper use I expect they’ll be better still.

But hey, I’m just too positive.

A Drop In Prospective ADIs?

I noticed someone was saying that there has been a “huge” drop in the number of people training to become ADIs.

Using the DSA’s new published statistics, the following can be gleaned from the number of people taking Part 2 tests:

Year Total Part 2 Tests
2007/08 16,185
2008/09 14,574
2009/10 14,942
2010/11 10,916

So, it would appear that the number was relatively flat between 2007 and 2010, but showed a drop of about 4,000 last year. However, it should be noted that the number of those passing the test only fell by about 2,000 between last year and the previous period (i.e. the success rate appears to be increasing).

For Part 3, there are only data available for the last two years:

Year Total Part 3 Tests
2009/10 10,581
2010/11 9,204

Here, there is a yearly difference of about 1,200 – but the total number of passes only fell by 344 – or around 3.5% from the previous period. You could argue that a greater percentage of people passing Part 2 ended up passing Part 3 last year, since the difference between Part 2 and Part 3 is much smaller for last year than it is for the previous year (i.e greater success rate). But there is insufficient data to conclude this with any certainty (it’s probably a contributory factor). In any case, the pass rate from the DSA data is flat.

The previous years were those covered by the “earn £30k, no qualifications needed” adverts. Last year was free of that, so it is also likely that the quality of those embarking upon training is now improving – hence the greater success rates if you look at the data overall.

When you also consider that 2011 was a terrible year as far as the economy was concerned, I don’t think you can say anything other than people were being careful how they spent their money.

And the other thing to remember is that – just like share prices – a fall is often followed by a rise. It might not be this year, as the fall in Part 2 tests is carried forward, but it’s pretty certain that there will be one at some stage.

So, Price Cutting IS Cutting Your Own Throat

This story came through yesterday. I nearly missed it, because it isn’t obviously related to driving or driving instruction – until you think about what it is saying.

It says that retail figures released by the Office for National Statistics confirm that discounting is the only factor driving sales at the moment, and consumers are reluctant to spend. It warns of another difficult year.

It doesn’t take a genius to work out that business overheads are covered by income from Price-cuttingsales, with the difference being business profit. It’s fairly obvious that if income from sales falls then so does profit – and it’s even more obvious that if the profit is negative, you’re going to go out of business very quickly.

Well, I say it’s obvious… but it’s clearly not as obvious as it should be to many driving instructors out there.

Even in my neck of the woods, where the typical hourly rate is £23 or £24 an hour, the number of cars you see with stupid prices plastered all over them is unbelievable. The British Retail Consortium in that link is certainly not wrong.

How do these instructors think they are ever going to be able to charge a sensible price again without losing work? After all, all these special offers are designed to fill empty diaries “until it picks up”. It’s debatable whether they actually do that in any case, but the more work you get the greater your overheads (fuel) become, and if you charge stupid prices you quickly run into trouble with your profits. Let’s look at an example.

Imagine an instructor charging £22 an hour, but with very little work – say, 10 hours a week. His car costs him £100, and the fuel for those 10 hours about £70. His income is £220, and his expenditure £170. His profit (wages) is therefore £50.

If that same instructor does a silly offer of “10 lessons for £99” and drops his price to £16 (like one I’ve seen recently), then if his diary suddenly rockets to 40 hours a week (which is highly unlikely) his profit will be somewhere in the region of £250.

If his diary only goes up to 20 hours – which is MUCH more likely – his profit will be in the region of £30. So by cutting his prices he is doing twice as much work for 40% less profit!

Even at 30 hours of work – the most many instructors can expect even under the best circumstances – his profit will only rise to around £160 for a tripling of the workload to a level where most people would simply conk out with exhaustion – particularly if they are new ADIs!

Of course, with such low profits you’ll inevitably want to cut your costs, and the one that drives profit most of all is the cost of fuel – which has already risen by 40% in the last three years, with the possibility of another 15% this year. So your attempts to not drive much on lessons will have pupils queuing up for the exit.

The price-cutters simply can’t see the damage they’re doing to themselves and others.

To make matters worse, they do it in the firm belief that when things pick up they can charge a sensible hourly rate again. But if you snagged your pupils with stupid prices, how are you ever going to expect to keep them if you hike prices by 40% again? It isn’t going to happen.

Price-cutting is simply business suicide.

That Didn’t Take Long!

I wrote this morning about the DSA’s new online statistics, and suggested that the amateur statisticians might have some fun with them.

It didn’t take long. KentOnline trumpets that the driving test pass rate is improving, and creates a whole article around that.

The simple fact is that the pass rate has gone up from 44% two years ago, to 46% last year, to 47% for the current year so far. A 3% rise over three years is hardly significant.

It also doesn’t take into account the fact that the national pass rate was 46% in 1999, and has hovered between 45-47% ever since then. In other words, the pass rate isn’t increasing – it just appears to have done so over the last three years to people who haven’t got a clue about statistics and statistical significance.

And now, the RAC is on the case with pointless prose. So far, all these have done is just repeat what is in the DSA data, but using different words.