A potentially very informative article in the Leighton Buzzard Observer is marred by stupid comments by someone who likes to think they have authority. They don’t.
The article starts out with some statistics, showing how compliance with urban speed limits is improving and pedestrian fatalities are falling (data covering 2003-present). So far, so good.
But then, IAM (Institute of Advanced Motorists) gets involved and the focus shifts somewhat.
Bearing in mind that the statistics show that fatalities are falling, IAM says:
In the UK, between two-thirds and three-quarters of fatalities occur on rural roads, yet driving on rural roads still isn’t a mandatory part of the basic driving test.
Most young drivers get plenty of exposure to urban hazards but often their first experience of a rural road comes after the test when they are on their own. This is unacceptable.
It doesn’t matter if 10,000 people are killed, or only 10. Three quarters remains three quarters as a statistic, and it reflects the relative safety of rural roads. Nothing will alter the fact that rural roads contain more hazards – other than filling them all in, or converting them all to A roads and straightening them.
And as for rural roads being mandatory on the test… how? Many test centres and cities have no rural routes within 40 minutes’ drive, so how would they do it?
I’m not saying rural roads shouldn’t be covered where possible (and some Nottingham routes do contain such roads), but demanding that they be mandatory? Someone is out of touch with reality again.
Many, many, many, many, many… you get the idea… years ago, I saw a documentary where they had “transmitted” electricity a few metres across an office to light a bulb. The presenter even stood in the middle to show how safe it was. One thing he didn’t go into detail about, as far as I remember, is how inefficient this was. You might consume 100 watts of power on the transmitter side, but far less than that made it across the void to be used by whatever it was you were powering.
A father-of-eight (good start) was involved in a high-speed police chase through Portsmouth at 3.30 in the morning. The chase lasted for two miles and four minutes, and ended with John Williams crashing into a fence.
A father was being given a driving lesson by his wife, and they had their 4 year old daughter in the back. His satnav – an old one – told him to take a right turn across a 60mph road. Their car was t-boned by a car coming the other way and the 4-year old girl was killed.
We love to whinge and whine about all those Johnny Foreigners on our roads, and how bad they are compared to us. Particularly strong feelings (coupled with limited intelligence) might be shown by also flying a Union Jack or George Cross outside their houses.
In a nutshell, 60% of those questioned said slow drivers were the biggest cause of stress on the roads, and 45% of those admitted to dangerously attempting to overtake to get past them.
The police have been “cracking down” in Knightsbridge. OK. Yah! Apparently, they seized cars like Bentleys, Porsches, Ferraris… and even a Bugatti Veyron for a variety of offences. An operation last night near Harrods involved a nhew Bentley (worth around £200,000) being seized. Offences include driving whilst banned, driving with no insurance, illegal number plates, over-tinted windows, and being arrogant twats (that last one isn’t covered by a specific law).
The