BSM On BBC’s Watchdog: Update

EDIT: For the hard-of-thinking out there, this story is from 2010. BSM is now owned by the AA, and any complaints mentioned in this article are totally irrelevant as far as choosing BSM as a driving school goes. Remember: this TV programme is from 2010.


I haven’t seen it yet – waiting for it to go live on iPlayer – but the BSM Instructor Academy has issued this:

Watchdog Statement

BBC Watchdog – BSM statement.

In keeping with our company policy of keeping our instructors as informed as possible, please see the below statement that has been issued to Watchdog and will be aired on this evening’s show.

“We would like to thank Watchdog for bringing these issues to BSM’s attention.

As the UK’s largest driving school with over 130,000 learner drivers each year, we accept that there are going to be occasional instances where we don’t get it right. However, having taught the nation to drive for over 100 years and with a pass rate at least 20% higher than the national average, it’s important that we work hard to maintain the high standards that we have set for ourselves. We would like to apologise for any customer dissatisfaction in relation to these cases and we have made operational changes and implemented new control measures to ensure they are not repeated.

We are working hard to ensure these instances won’t occur again and we have already started the process of contacting the individual customers concerned. We will be working with them to find suitable resolutions to their problems and offering compensation where appropriate.

Unfortunately, our website incorrectly stated that people pass with BSM every six seconds. This was due to an administrative error rather than an attempt to mislead and we now have controls in place to ensure this won’t happen again.

We commit to monitor all these issues closely and to learn from them in order to continue teaching the UK to drive for the next 100 years.”

We feel this is an honest and fair response and will continue keep you informed of the reaction to the segment on tonights show.

So, it seems that the Watchdog had latched on to several very specific complaints from individuals. I will comment when I have seen the Watchdog report.

One thing I did notice when I was on Watchdog’s site, is that it says of tonight’s programme:

Anne and Matt have been digging up stories on Asda online and Marks and Spencer this week.

Now, doesn’t that look like someone was going to say one thing and ended up not finishing it off? Digging up stories? Or just digging the dirt?

Pocket Pooper Pack

A reader has sent in this link, also from Autoblog. OK, it’s not for poop, but I couldn’t think of anything better for the article title.

Pocket ToiletI must confess that I already knew about this (or something very similar) from a while back.

From what I can tell (Autoblog isn’t giving much by way of intructional advice), you stuff one of these in your underpants and just pee yourself whenever and wherever the fancy takes you! The material in the pad turns liquid to gel.

It claims that there is no mess and no smell – but I would suggest the things would need to be the size of a small beach towel, otherwise your car seat runs the risk of getting a little messy if you don’t place it right, or if it moves.

And that’s another thing: I like to be confortable when I’m driving, and the idea of having something like this shoved in my keks just doesn’t appeal to me. Even less so once I’d shaken the python and would then have anything up to a litre of warm (but getting colder) gel between my legs!

The advertising spiel goes on about not finding anywhere where you can “go”. You can always find “somewhere”.

Nope! Only the saddest of the sad (or someone with a serious medical condition) is ever going to want to use this. And at £4, it hardly passes as “spending a penny”.

Worn Road Markings A Killer?

A reader has drawn my attention to this Autoblog story concerning worn road markings. It is also covered by the BBC.

Worn Road MarkingsThe story is suggesting that, along with potholes, missing or worn road markings are contributing directly to accidents and subsequent fatalities.

A lot of roads in my area have recently been repainted – they really were dire! However, there are still many where it isn’t clear whether there are two lanes or one, and some of the repainting only seems to have taken place within a certain distance of traffic lights or junctions… in other words, only half the job has been done.

The report claims that eight out of ten of the worst roads in the country also have the worst markings. It also adds:

The AA is so concerned about this issue that just last week it sent out thousands of volunteers to report on worn markings near where they live. The results of this survey will be published soon.

I think we need to be careful. Of course, road markings are important, and there is no doubt that their absence can lead to deangerous situations.

But we also need to remember that being a prat comes much higher up the list than that when it comes to wrapping your car (or bike) around a tree.

Paramore At Nottingham Arena

A bit of a lean period on the music front of late. But I went to the Nottingham Arena tonight to see Paramore on the opening night of their UK tour.

ParamoreWhen we ordered the tickets there was no problem: like the music, want to see the band.

In the interim, however, I was worried to see Hayley Williams collaborating with rap artist B.o.B. on the various music channels. I hate rap. And to make matters worse, I realised soon after we’d booked that B.o.B. was the supporting act.

Now, I still hate rap. But to be fair to B.o.B. he put on a decent show (there was only one obligatory “motherf***er”), and a couple of songs were quite rock-like. He still had the pointless dancers, of course, but then that’s what rap is. And some of the time it was impossible to work out where some of the sound was coming from – it sure as hell wasn’t coming from anyone who was holding an instrument, of that I’m certain. He also managed to get a few spectacular vocals immediately after taking the mike away from his mouth (if it wasn’t miming, then there was one hell of a backing track being used).

Naturally, the bass was so intense that your heart was struggling not to go into arrhythmia, and my trousers were shaking!

Hayley Williams came on to duet with him on their collaboration song.

Anyway, after the set change, Paramore came on. I have to say that they were excellent. It was difficult to hear any of the lyrics, and the sound was very intense just as you’d expect. But they put on a very polished show, with enough rawness to keep it in the rock camp. Hayley seemed genuinely surprised at the size of the venue and the number of people there (it wasn’t a full house, but it was close), and she was clearly happy at the reception they got.

They did a few acoustic numbers (as well as a country one – they are from Tennessee, after all), but the set was predominantly tracks which define the sound for which they are famous.

As I said, an excellent show.

On the side of it all, the audience was refreshingly short (and young – with weak bladders, meaning there was a constant flow in and out), so visibility was good. Not many were old enough to drink, so getting beer was easy at the break. A few songs required people to hold up lighters until their thumbs got too hot to carry on (that always cracks me up). And initially, you had to put up with the forest of iPhones until peoples arms got tired or batteries ran out.

Afterwards, we went for a pretty decent curry at Anoki (just round the corner). Mind you, it was bloody expensive. Main courses started at £14, and anything decent was nearer £17. Starters were £7, and rice and naan were £3 each. God knows how much the beer cost. It was lucky they were doing a 2 for 1 offer on main courses (we didn’t know about this before we went in), otherwise our £85 bill for four would have been closer to £120!

There weren’t many people in, even though thousands were walking past outsode. I can’t work out if that was because of the price, or perhaps because everyone else was off for a Happy Meal.

BSM And Corsa Switchback

I wrote recently about how BSM is dumping the Fiat 500 and returning to Vauxhall and Corsas as their tuition vehicles. Of course, the forums have been rife with speculation by the know-it-all BSM-haters.

These two snippets are from the BSM Instructor Academy. The earliest says:

NEW CAR DEAL WITH VAUXHALL

We are absolutely delighted to announce a huge new partnership with another iconic British motoring giant… We are rekindling our a previous 18-year relationship with Vauxhall as of next March, with our fleet of Fiat 500s and Grande Punto’s being replaced with 5 door Vauxhall Corsas from the award winning ecoFLEX range.

The fleet will be changed to Vauxhall by the end of 2011.

Dating right back to 2009 when we first acquired BSM. There was no car deal in place for BSM at that time. Vauxhall and Aviva had parted ways and we needed to get cars to our instructors – clearly a vulnerable position for a driving school to be in! We secured for our Instructors the Car of the Year, the Fiat 500. We worked with our instructors and learners through surveys and by monitoring communications closely to understand instructor’s feelings about the Fiat 500.

In May of this year, instructors sent us a clear message saying that 80% of them wanted to drive the Vauxhall Corsa – we can’t ignore that overwhelming strength of opinion. The Corsa is the instructors car of choice, so we’ve set about delivering to you the car you wanted. Here are some other essentials that you required and we’ve made sure that we deliver…

  • Full size spare tyres
  • Steel Wheels instead of Alloys
  • Larger dials on the dashboard so you can see the speed
  • Rear headrests
  • Upgraded power steering
  • Better fuel consumption
  • And all cars will have 5 doors
  • 5 star NCAP safety rating

We are market leaders and it’s important to us that our offer to Instructors is head and shoulders above our competition.

So we’re back to British, and we can’t pretend we’re not delighted to be backing British industry once more. We must say a huge thank you to Fiat for an enormously successful 18 month relationship, which came along at the right time.

Looking forward, this is fantastic news for us, for our learners, for our instructors and for our economy. The fact remains though that this would all mean nothing if we didn’t have the colleagues at BSM to help us maintain our reputation as the UK’s biggest and best driving school. And without that reputation we wouldn’t have this deal. So it’s down to our instructors and colleagues – to you! So thanks for the continued hard work, and here’s to and exciting year ahead.

And then a more recent one:

Switching to Vauxhall – Follow Up

The newspaper coverage of our move to Vauxhall has said that we ‘ditched’ Fiat because the cars were too small and been caused an issue with the DSA but this not true.

We have in fact spoken to DSA this morning, and they assure us that the information in the newspaper didn’t come from. Furthermore, they have offered us this quote if we want to go back to the papers.

“The Fiat 500 meets DSA’s Minimum Test Vehicle requirements. DSA has confirmed to us again today that the Fiat 500 remains suitable for driving lessons, check tests and driving tests, and that the agency was in no way involved in BSM’s decision”

To reiterate our reasons for the switch, we have listened to instructor feedback about the Fiat 500, and we have managed to come to an excellent arrangement with Vauxhall that not only makes good commercial sense and gives our instructors what they want, but which also factors in a number of instructor specific improvements:

  • Full size spare tyres
  • Steel Wheels instead of Alloys
  • Larger dials on the dashboard so you can see the speed
  • Rear headrests
  • Upgraded power steering
  • Better fuel consumption
  • And all cars will have 5 doors

Of course, this won’t stop the “experts” giving out misleading information, but at least the facts are there for anyone who cared about such trivia.

EDIT 28/6/2012: Remember that BSM is now run by The AA.

BSM On BBC’s Watchdog

EDIT: For the hard-of-thinking out there, this story is from 2010. BSM is now owned by the AA, and any complaints mentioned in this article are totally irrelevant as far as choosing BSM as a driving school goes. Remember: this TV programme is from 2010.


BSM LogoAt the end of the last episode of Watchdog, they mentioned that they would be covering BSM on the next show (which is 11 November), though they didn’t say for what specific reason. Naturally, this has sent a lot of non-BSM ADIs into orgasm!

Speculation is rife – the more juicy the rumour, the better.

What makes me laugh is that in a week people will know exactly what the storyline is, and they’re going to look right prats for being wrong. Actually, when I think about it, they probably won’t – most of the idiots listening to them want to believe the worst, too. And the beliefs will remain long after the facts are known.

The BSM Instructor Academy website clarifies:

Watchdog

Many of you will have seen Watchdog on BBC1 last night and the fact that BSM are to appear on the program next week. We thought it important to clarify with you the reason for this, particularly as you may be asked questions by your pupils.

The main issue being raised by the program was due to a statement on our website stating that someone passes their test with BSM every 6 seconds. This is of course incorrect and the statement was placed on the website in error. We have been quick to point this out to the BBC and have ensured that this has now been removed.

On the back of this, they have also picked up on four separate complaints sent in to the program by ex BSM pupils, these complaints have for example, related to such matters as one pupil having had four different instructors over a two year period and others where pupils have complained about NTU’s at tests, all of which we have been happy to answer and all of which have been investigated and resolved to the customers satisfaction. It is absolutely key to point out, that through the excellent work carried out by both BSM employees and instructors, BSM have thousands of very satisfied customers and we will of course continue to strive to improve our service by listening to the feedback we receive from all those learning to drive with us.

So, no failed coup. No uncovered world domination plot. Pretty mundane, really.

Despatch: November 2010

Despatch MagazineThe latest issue of Despatch was circulated a few days ago.

Click the logo or follow this link to see it in PDF format.

The lead article concerns independent driving. It appears that most people (including many of the ADI organisations) have welcomed this as a significant step forward in the testing process. I doubt that this will change the attitude of the fossils who have set themselves against independent driving (and anything else the DSA does) and refuse to budge.

Electronic Parking Brakes On Test

An email alert from the DSA (this is an old post – it’s DVSA now, of course):

Electronic parking brakes suitable for tests

  • Vehicles with electronic parking brakes can be used for tests
  • Change from 1 November 2010
  • DSA responds to advances in vehicle technology

From 1 November vehicles fitted with an electronic parking brake will be allowed to be used for practical driving tests.

There are usually two ways of releasing an electronic parking brake:

  • using the footbrake while releasing the parking brake, then coordinating the accelerator and clutch to move away
  • coordinating the accelerator and clutch – when the electronics sense the clutch is at biting point the parking brake releases automatically

The parking brake will not usually release automatically if:

  • the accelerator is not used
  • the controls are not coordinated correctly

If there is no loss of control either method is acceptable.

If the examiner needs to take action to stop the vehicle, and it’s not fitted with dual controls, they will apply and hold the electronic parking brake – this will bring the vehicle to a controlled stop.

Advances in technology

To begin with, electronic parking brakes were fitted only to top of the range vehicles. DSA decided not to allow manual vehicles fitted with them to be used for driving tests.

Electronic parking brakes are now being fitted to an increasing number of vehicles, so it’s unrealistic to continue this policy.

Useful links:

Well, if people want to buy something that is unnecessarily complex and will cost more to maintain and repair then it’s their problem.

I teach learners to do manoeuvres with no gas to begin with. That way, they have to learn how to control it without stalling. Once they are able to do it then they can use gas if they wish (and I’m happy we’re not going to end up in someone’s front room). But these fancy cars won’t allow that: they will need gas otherwise the parking brake won’t release.

Not much of a problem, but why change something that works fine in its existing form? I, for one, will not be getting one of these as a tuition vehicle. That’s for sure.

Another Test Pass

Tick!

A really old post.

Well done to HH, who passed her test yesterday with 10 driver faults. She was extremely nervous – usually much better than those 10 faults would suggest – but she held it together and got her driving licence.

The examiner was really good and acknowledged that she was nervous in the debrief at the end. On the independent driving section she went off route and the examiner had to bring her back, but she handled it all correctly.

Theory Test Questions

An email alert from the DSA:

DSA to stop publishing questions used in theory tests

  • Candidates need to understand theory
  • End to memorising answers
  • Unpublished questions used from 1 January 2012

The Driving Standards Agency is to stop publishing the multiple choice questions and answers used in theory tests, Road Safety Minister Mike Penning announced today.

This will help to ensure that new drivers learn the principles behind driving theory rather than just learning answers.

The move follows the introduction of independent driving into the driving test and the DSA’s decision to stop publishing test routes in October 2010, to make sure the test assesses a learner’s ability to drive and not their capacity to memorise routes.

Mike Penning said:

“The driving theory test should help to prepare drivers for real life on the road – good driving is not just about vehicle-handling skills, but also about having the knowledge and understanding of safe driving theory.

“No longer publishing these questions and answers will mean that successful candidates will have to understand the theory rather than simply memorising answers.

“I believe that this – along with the other changes we are making to the driving test regime – will lead to better drivers and safer roads.”

In September 2011 DSA will change the format of books and other learning materials available to help people prepare for theory tests. This will take place at the same time as more challenging case studies are introduced to car and motorcycle theory tests.

Then, from 1 January 2012, DSA will create theory tests using questions which will not be published.

Practice questions and answers, not used in theory tests, will still be available to help candidates with revision.

Other companies which publish products containing DSA theory test questions will also no longer have access to the questions used in the tests.

I’m not completely sure how I feel about this. I agree totally that candidates should actually know about road safety. I also don’t think that anyone could memorise all 1,000 questions (although some do try).

I have a pupil at the moment who can drive and has been doing for many years. He has got to take his theory test, and yesterday he was complaining about how some of the questions were “crap” and “wrong”. Two that seemed to get him particular annoyed (these were just “crap”) were the one about guide dogs for the deaf (burgundy jackets) and how far to depress the chest when delivering CPR.

He said he knows a few deaf people and in all his years has never – even once – seen a guide dog for the deaf (well, they’re called “hearing dogs”, but we all get the idea). And he asks why he needs to know the chest compression depth when he is just learning to drive (he’s done First Aid in his job, so knows the answer anyway).

I do get pupils who get a few questions wrong and we have to have a discussion about why. Some questions definitely are a little misleading – they’re the ones likely to send the self-proclaimed heroes of the special needs candidate incandescent with rage. The questions aren’t wrong, just very confusing to non-experts or people under pressure in the Theory Test Centre.

It will be interesting to see what happens when the change occurs. And I’ll have to make sure I don’t buy any more of those Driving Test Success DVDs in bulk… mind you, they’ll still be useful, I guess.

EDIT: The most recent DSA news update says the change comes into force from 23 January 2012.

Search terms used to find the blog:

The Theory Test is a load of bollocks

No it isn’t. This statement is exclusive to that group of people who fail it, and yet somehow think that they’re great drivers. If you don’t know the Highway Code, you are a very poor driver. And if you can’t pass the Theory Test, it’s because you don’t know the Highway Code!

The Hazard Perception Test (HPT) is a load of bollocks

No it isn’t. If you concentrated on practicing it instead of whinging about having to use a computer or even do a test, you’d pass it easily.

The HPT is NOT intended to be a substitute for real world hazard management. It just helps you learn to identify the kinds of things to look for in the early stages of learning to drive. It is very relevant to anyone under the age of 25-30, or who has never driven before – but if you’re older than that with road experience then you’ll just have to get used to the fact that you’re going to have to do it, so concentrate on passing it instead of moaning.