Category - ADI

Fix Those Roads… Or Else!

I saw this story in The Press and Journal (a Scottish newspaper).

PotholesScottish councillors have told transport bosses to pull their fingers out and start fixing some of the roads in Aberdeen.

Although clearly a very local issue in this instance, every newspaper across the land could easily generate the same story by talking to local residents and highlighting the appalling condition of many roads at the moment. The bad weather over the last two winters is the obvious primary cause, but that shouldn’t excuse those in charge from fixing things.

I had a pupil on test this afternoon, and the private roads around Colwick MPTC are in a very poor condition – so bad that the potholes are quite capable of causing serious damage. And in West Bridgford later I had to gingerly negotiate a sunken drain with massive pothole on Albert Road, just near the mini-roundabout.

In the meantime, Nottingham City Council is more concerned about farting with the road layouts to make driving more difficult. At present it is busy making Bath Street even more dangerous by making the pavement as wide as possible on the corner donw near the roundabout at the Bingo Hall. Apparently, this is an EU-funded programme called “connecting the Eastside” or something similar.

When you consider exactly what the “Eastside” is, you can’t help thinking that a very high wall would be better than what they are trying to do at the moment.

Cutting Speed Cameras: The Risks

A story from the Plymouth Herald suggests that there is statistical evidence that drivers slowing down merely for the cameras does result in fewer accidents and deaths.

It’s not rocket science, really.

Devon and Cornwall roads still claim at least one life every week. However, this is 40% down since the cameras were introduced – though the story makes it clear that the reduction is not entirely due to cameras.

Yet government cutbacks mean that cameras across the country are going to have to be taken out.

The Herald says:

The Government’s view, expressed through the Department of Transport, is a mealy-mouthed abdication of that responsibility, on this issue. While it says it would “expect road safety to remain a priority” it has removed the ring-fencing on grants so that local authorities can make up their own mind where they spend the funds they raise.

It isn’t getting much right, is it? This “government” of ours?

Driving Tests In English Only (American Tale)

An interesting story from the Southeast Missourian (USA). State legislators are supporting a Missouri House bill whereby driving tests could only be conducted in English.

House Speaker Steven Tilley, R-Perryville said:

If there’s a flashing sign that says ‘merge left,’ I want somebody who can read that sign…

Missouri currently conducts the test in 11 languages, but the candidate can pay for and supply their own interpreter (from an approved list) if they speak a language that isn’t covered.

I’ll let you read the story and form your own opinions.

Imagine someone raising something like that in the UK.

EDIT 23/2/2011: CBS St Louis reports that the bill mentioned above is going to be debated in the House.

EDIT 5/3/2011: WLTZ 38 News reports that a lawsuit filed in Alabama claiming that multiple-language driving tests were “unconstituional” has been rejected by the Alabama Supreme Court. No reason was given.

Drink Drivers To Escape Due To Cuts?

Booze!This story in the Daily Mirror makes worrying reading. It appears that the Mickey Mouse government we currently have has forced cuts which mean that blood and urine samples taken from those who have failed roadside breath tests may not be tested in time for the results to hold up in court.

They need to be tested within 14 days, and although the Police think that they will be experts are warning that they may not.

Beyond 14 days and the results are not conclusive – anyone just below the limit could read higher, and those well above could end up reading lower. This is due to chemical changes which take place in the samples.

Think of the implications if the charge is death by dangerous driving.

Parents Picket Parking Pests

From a local newspaper covering Basingstoke comes a story about parents-cum-vigilantes patrolling school drop-off points and hassling those who park illegally or dangerously there.

On the one hand, you have to applaud them – parking illegally, dangerously, or just inconsiderately outside schools is a major problem throughout the country.

But you can’t help detect a certain amount of hypocrisy – fuelled by the spin given to the story by the newspaper – when you consider that 99.9% of the offenders in question are… PARENTS DROPPING OFF/PICKING UP THEIR OWN KIDS!

I’m sorry, but that’s the truth of it.

Give Way To Oncoming Vehicles SignI see it every day. I’ve mentioned before the fiasco near Hollygirt School in Nottingham – it’s a private school, where the rules that normal people have to adhere to don’t apply. Just outside the school, on Cranmer Street, is a chicane system on a bend. It has signs at each end to tell you to give way to oncoming vehicles because you can’t see clearly.

The luvvies who send their kids to Hollygirt use the chicane for parking – and on both sides! Half on the pavement, half off. First thing in the morning it is lethal down there. And to make matters worse, there is a full-size Premier coach/school bus which parks there every afternoon to pick the little darlings up. And it will park wherever it can if someone is already in its usual place on the yellow lines.

But let’s not just blame Hollygirt. Every school in the land has the same problem. Women in 4x4s they can hardly see over the steering wheels of parking on bends and blocking junctions.People stopping on the zig-zags because they obviously don’t apply to them picking up their kids, do they? School buses doing whatever they damn well want, wherever they want, for as long as they want (I’ve seen one double decker around here which has dropped a kid off at a junction in a village, then reversed out minor-to-major so it didn’t have to waste time turning around somewhere safe).

At some point, a school bus blocking the road ceases to be the safe haven it is intended to be, and becomes an annoying obstacle other drivers will try to get round – which then puts the kids in greater danger than ever.

So as I say, it sounds great in theory – but I wonder how many of the vigilantes are guilty of the crimes they are now standing up against?

Can’t Afford To Run Your Franchise?

Someone found the blog on the search term “I can’t afford to run my BSM franchise “. I can never understand why people get in such a state over this, because it is just a case of applying logic.

BSM LogoYou need to be doing a certain number of hours of work to cover your business costs. If you aren’t getting the hours then you have to do something about it.

Option 1 is to get more pupils – call your franchise and explain.

Option 2 – which can also be used if Option 1 fails – is to get out of the franchise as soon as you can.

In the current economic climate absolutely no one can guarantee pupils. And quite frankly, if BSM (now part of the AA) can’t get them then it is going to be an uphill struggle for you to try and do it on your own.

It is also worth pointing out that there is no reason why you can’t try and generate your own pupils while you are with your franchise – i.e. while there is a still the safety net. That will give you an idea of what to expect if you cut the ties and went independent.

Remember the logic:

  • you need to get work to pay the franchise
  • if you don’t have the work, can you get it?
  • if you can’t, could anyone else?
  • how long can you withstand your expenses being greater than your income?

Continuing to lose money and not be able to afford to run your business is not a viable option. So it may be that getting out completely is the only way forward. No one can make you pay money you simply don’t have, so seek professional advice over any silly contracts you may have signed.

Be careful about listening to people who would blame this on BSM’s franchise fee and use it as “proof” that you should go independent. Logic, again:

  • if BSM can’t supply work, what makes you think that you can?
  • that’s especially true if you’ve already tried – and failed.
  • what is it like in your area? Is everyone struggling?

You need to break the problem down into simpler ones – not turn it into ever more complicated puzzles.

Too Drunk For Theory Test

I saw this story about a Romanian (dead link), who had been banned from driving and then turned up for his theory test too drunk even to walk!

Cristina Tanasa, a spokeswoman for the local police, said: “The candidate was tested with the breathalyser and it turned out he had 1.11 mg/l alcohol in the exhaled air.

“The exam organizers noticed him having difficulties walking and decided to give him the alcohol test. He was asked to leave the exam room immediately.”

He’ll be allowed to sit it again.

My quick maths says he was around 4x over the UK limit (though this was in Zimbabwe, not the UK)!

New Motor Insurance Law

An email alert from the DSA:

DVLA reminds motorists of new motor insurance law

The DVLA in conjunction with the Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) and the British Insurance Brokers Association (BIBA) are reminding drivers that a new law to be rolled out in late Spring will mean that they must keep their vehicle insured unless they have notified the DVLA that is it is being kept off the road.

Information about the new law is being distributed with all V11 tax renewal forms from March in addition to the guidance and video available now on Directgov.

David Evans, DVLA’s corporate affairs director, said:

“We know that uninsured drivers are a menace on our roads and add around £30 to honest motorists’ premiums.

“It is vitally important that motorists understand the change and how it will impact on them. That is why we have added new information to Directgov which offers clear advice to help motorists understand the new rules.”

Neil Drane, MIB’s head of motor insurance database services said:

“The change in law is a stepping up of enforcement activity, so that not only those vehicles driven without insurance will be caught. Now the registered keeper must make sure that their vehicle is insured all the time. And if it is, then they need not be concerned. The DVLA and MID will be systematically checked, so that the levels of uninsured driving are reduced even further.”

Graeme Trudgill, BIBA’s head of corporate affairs said:

“Continuous Insurance Enforcement will help reduce the £500 million burden on innocent motorists caused by uninsured drivers, vehicle keepers should ensure they stay insured or SORN their vehicle if it is laid up, vehicle keepers can always check at askmid.com or speak to their insurance broker or company if they have any doubt.”

For more information go to direct.gov.uk/stayinsured.
 

Tesco To Sell Used Cars?

TescoThis story in What Car? suggests that Tesco is moving into selling used cars.

No details are know – so it is a little bit of speculation at the moment – but they have registered the tescocars.com domain name. It is thought that sales will be purely online.

Tesco already sells insurance and tyres, so this wouldn’t be a complete surprise if it happened.

Test Centre Closures: PM Questioned

From the Kirriemuir Herald – the Prime Minister has been challenged over planned closures of the Forfar and Arbroath test centres.

I’m not exactly sure what the beef is.

Commenting on the closures Mr Weir said: “It is completely unacceptable that the Driving Standards Agency can act in this high handed and undemocratic way.

“They simply announced the closure of the centres in a letter about the opening of the new multi-purpose test centre in Dundee. There was no consultation with either the community or the instructors affected by the move.

So? That’s exactly what happened around here when West Bridgford and Gedling closed, and Colwick MPTC took over. Parking and access to both West Bridgford and Gedling TCs was appalling and moving to the MPTC has turned out to be great – although that’s not how ADIs viewed it at the time (big surprise there, then).

Arbroath, Forfar, and Dundee are each about 15 miles apart – so those who previously took tests in Arbroath or Forfar will simply have to travel 15 miles to Dundee. Compare that with the cost of maintaining two additional test centres and there’s no comparison.

The politician involved (Mike Weir) appears to have a much bigger issue on his mind. He talks of “localism” and “consultations” with the local community. And, of course, this is Scotland we are talking about – so the chances of positive discrimination in one form or another is a card he can play.

A quick look at the Google images for the three locations show that both Arbroath and Forfar TCs are located in narrow streets in residential areas – just like West Bridgford and Gedling were. A look at the Dundee image shows a wide open industrial area – just like the Colwick MPTC location. The Dundee MPTC opens on February 28th, which means it has been purpose-built: planned as a direct replacement for Arbroath and Forfar, and also covering the Dundee area.

Mr Weir has the additional lever in that Mickey Mouse – sorry, I mean the Prime Minister of this joke government – is hell bent on reversing everything that was ever decided under Labour.

They should all get a life.

EDIT 18/02/2011: An update to this story – a stay of execution is granted to Arbroath TC.

If Mike Weir gets his ridiculous way on this, I want West Bridgford and Gedling back – and the Colwick MPTC converting back to a fly-tipping site.

EDIT 22/02/2011: According to The Courier newspaper, a “one year reprieve” has been granted to the test centres. The wording allows all concerned parties to pretend that they have won.

Reading between the lines, though, and the test centres are still likely to close – it’s just that the government is going to take a year to “consider” it:

Mr Weir had been verbally assured by UK transport under-secretary Mike Penning that the centres would not be shut while the matter was being considered, and that promise has now been cemented.

That part I’ve emboldened is the key phrase. The article continues:

He said, “The DSA have assured me that the two centres will remain open for at least a year whilst all options are looked at for delivering the service in Arbroath and Forfar. The strong campaign, locally and in Parliament, has clearly forced a major rethink in how the DSA are looking at local test centres and I will be keeping up the pressure to try and ensure that we continue to have testing facilities locally.”

Mr Weir claimed the extension would provide “breathing space” and time for discussion.

It’s not quite the same as a reprieve, is it? And a tacit admisson, perhaps, that they are going to close at some point from Mr Weir? The DSA replies:

…”We will be continuing to use the test centres at Arbroath and Forfar for another year while we consider all options for service delivery in that area.”

Seeing as the new MPTC was due to open very soon (so has obviously been partly built, or at least planned to building point), the DSA has now been forced into a money-wasting situation by Mr Weir and those ADIs who couldn’t accept change.

And speaking of wastes of money, the following comparison of phrases in the article is interesting:

A campaign was mounted by a group of driving instructors who claimed they, and their students, stood to lose thousands of pounds if the centres were axed.

Arbroath councillor David Fairweather helped the instructors’ group to set up meetings and stage a protest outside the test centre in the town last month.

I wonder how much that cost? As much as keeping two small test centres open instead of moving to a single purpose-built one? It’s just a case of the tail wagging the dog. ADIs are experts at that sometimes.

Of course, the main protagonists hail it as “a u-turn”.