Category - Driving Tests

Direct Driving Tests.org

Unfortunately, I have no control over the specific ads which appear on the right of this blog. I can block an entire group (like pornography), but I can’t pick and choose individual adverts within a group which I allow. One advert in particular has just caught my eye.

Be aware that Direct Driving Tests.org is not an official DSA website, and they will almost certainly charge you extra for booking your test. I can’t say that you would end up losing your money if you used Direct Driving Tests.org, but there are plenty of others who deliberately make themselves look official and who would walk away with your money. If I could block this particular advert – which has plagiarised the old DSA arrow logo purposely to mislead people – I would. This outfit has been slammed by the ASA on previous occasions (they use various names to try and lure people in).

The only site you should use – unless you really want to spend more money than necessary and even risk not getting a test at all – is GOV.UK.

Your car theory test should cost £31, and your car practical test either £62 or £75 (depending on whether you do it on a weekday or a weekend). If any website charges a different amount, hit “cancel” immediately and use GOV.UK.

It would appear that Direct Driving Tests.org charges an additional £23 to book your practical test for you! You’d be far better off spending that on an extra lesson. And remember that if any company charges a similar additional fee for the theory test, you could get much better training materials for less than £5 on your smartphone and less than £8 for a DVD from Amazon.

Irresponsible Advice From PoliceWitness.com

This story came in on the newsfeeds. An organisation called PoliceWitness is suggesting that driving test candidates record their tests – covertly if necessary – to:

…ensure that the test was carried out fairly and an unsuccessful outcome was the correct decision.

This bunch appears to have ideas well above its station. It is implying that tests are NOT carried out fairly, and that the examiners’ decisions are NOT correct. It is also worth noting that PoliceWitness sells dash-cams – though I’m sure this has absolutely nothing to do with it at all!

PoliceWitness appears to be an online version of the Neighbourhood Watch. On its FAQ page it says:

We are not the Police, we do not answer to the Police, we only answer to you. No politics, no bureaucracy, no red (blue) tape! We help ensure the things that are important to you are dealt with in a way that you want.

In fact, the advice might actually be illegal. Most test centres have a notice posted warning that recording of tests is not allowed. PoliceWitness is getting itself into a very muddy area, since unless an examiner gives permission such recording could be a breach of the Data Protection Act. Again, on its website, PoliceWitness says:

Can I legally film someone in a public place, even without their consent or knowledge?

Yes, most definitely. Think about the thousands of CCTV cameras in our town centres, a news crew capturing a feature, or indeed the paparazzi who chase and ‘snap’ celebrities. Anyone in a public place can be captured legitimately.

There are always exceptions, one being footage that maybe used for the purposes of committing terrorism, and another is focusing on an individual persistently, without their consent, which may constitute the criminal offence of harassment. The filming of children may also constitute a criminal offence.

Capturing video evidence from your car is perfectly legal, as is standing by the roadside and filming as the world goes by!

The inside of the car during a driving test is NOT a “public place”, so PoliceWitness is talking bollocks. Filming is even more of a problem when it has been specifically forbidden, and the warning given that if a recording device is discovered during a test then the test will be terminated.

The simple fact is that in 99.9% of all driving tests, the outcome is fair and correct. It matters little that candidates or instructors disagree.

As for driving instructors like the one in the article claiming it would help them teach their pupils, that’s more bollocks. If you do your job properly you don’t need to see a video of the test – in any case, you can sit in the back if you’re that desperate to nit-pick what the examiner does. Pupils fail because they make mistakes, even when they can actually drive quite well. Live with it.


As of September 2014 there are rumours that the DVSA has reviewed its stance on cameras (though NOT to allow tests to be recorded). I haven’t seen anything official and will hold off commenting until I do.

Father Of The Year Nomination (Irish Entry)

This is the reaction of an Irish father to the news that his son had failed his driving test. Be warned that it contains swearing and phrases that some might find objectionable (especially that crazy woman from Manchester).

It’s worth pointing out that most of the Irish people I’ve ever known have sounded like they wanted to punch my lights out, even when they’re being friendly, so bear that in mind as you watch it.

Test Pass: 1/2/2014

TickWell done to James, who passed first time today with just 3 driver faults. A few weeks ago his need to pass went from “before summer” to “by February 14th” as a result of some upcoming interviews. Part of me hates these sorts of deadlines, but the other part enjoys them (it depends on the pupil, though).

James has been a good – albeit sometimes frustrating – pupil to teach. His desire to demonstrate to me that he knew where we were at all times by asking where we were going before I could give directions sometimes drove me up the wall, particularly when we were trying to deal with a junction and his attempts to demonstrate his geographical awareness distracted him and he didn’t slow down soon enough or change gear.

Still, it means all my passes this year have been first timers, with my overall pass rate being at 60%.

Driving Instructor Has 15% Pass Rate. So What?

This story in the newsfeeds is the result of a Daily Mail freedom of information (FOI) request. For anyone who doesn’t know, an FOI request results in a bunch of numbers that Daily Mail editorial staff don’t understand, which are then published for a readership that understands them even less. That readership includes many other driving instructors, judging by the indignation I am hearing from various places.

The story starts by stating that a female instructor in West Yorkshire has a 15% pass rate over a three-year period. One of her pupils has failed 27 times. Sorry, a “staggering” 27 times, in Mail hack parlance.

The article then states that she is working in an area which has previously been shown to have the “worst learner drivers in the UK”. It adds that three other instructors from the area are among the top 12 worst in Britain. It mentions a male instructor in the region with a 23% pass rate, and two females who have each taught pupils who have failed 17 and 19 times respectively.

Continuing on it’s tangled path, it then adds that earlier this year Heckmondwike – in West Yorkshire – was shown to have five of the worst learners in the country (all female). One of these took the test 34 times, and two others took it 32 times. The remaining two took their tests 29 times. However, four other West Yorkshire residents were also among the top 20 worst learners. A male learner took 30 tests, while three women took 30, 31, and 32 tests respectively.

It isn’t clear what point the Daily Mail is trying to make, as it leaps from one set of figures to another. It even finishes the article by referring to a Hampshire instructor with a 17% pass rate, and a Mancunian one who has a pupil who has failed 18 times.

The DSA quite clearly states in the story:

The pass rate of a driving instructor is no reflection of their teaching standard.

‘Instructors may not have trained the candidate but only presented them for the test. Others focus on training candidates who have difficulty in learning to drive.

The Mail has skipped over this. As usual, most Mail-reading driving instructors have not even seen it through the red mist that descended after reading the headline.

Since I have been doing this job I have noticed that people from certain groups show a strong tendency to want to go for their driving tests when – certainly in my opinion – they haven’t a cat in hell’s chance of passing. Even when they cannot complete a single manoeuvre, or drive unaided, they still want to “have a try”. I’ve had my fingers burnt in the past and, to be completely honest, I have too much pride in my pass rate these days just to keep hiring out my car to people who think they might get lucky. If that results in them going elsewhere – and it usually does – then so be it.

The locale being referred to in the article has a high immigrant or non-UK national population. In my experience this is precisely the demographic which throws up these “wanna try” learners. A lot of them will keep going to tests in their own cars, but there is a significant fringe group who are prepared to book a handful of lessons with an instructor in order to take the test in the instructor’s car. It stands to reason that if people like me won’t take them on (or who let them go when it becomes apparent what they’re after), there will be others who snap them up. It is also quite likely that instructors from certain other demographics (i.e. the male/female one) will be less forceful when it comes to saying “no”. None of these are absolutes – they’re just general tendencies. My guess is that the FOI numbers here are heavily influenced by all of this: that you have several female instructors who are mopping up all of the “wanna try” learners. Financially, it must be very good for them. If the DSA is happy, knowing the factors involved, what’s the problem?

You often hear the “safe driving for life” mantra – from instructors and the DSA – but it is a very grey area. I remember one time agreeing to take a girl to test before her theory test expired, thinking that I could get her up to the required standard in the time we had. Unfortunately, she turned out to have a real issue with some aspects of driving (basically, her brain exploded like a pan of popcorn at the slightest provocation and she did bizarre things as a result). After she failed her test I apologised to the examiner, and he simply replied “she obviously wasn’t test ready”. In one way he was absolutely right, but in another he was completely wrong. But his comment haunts me to this day.

On the other hand, I had a pupil recently who was a very slow learner. If he were to be assessed as a child now, I’m sure he’d be classed as special needs, but he was in his 20s. When he went to test I was worried he might do something unpredictable on the one hand, but I knew he was capable of passing on the other –  because he could do everything; it was whether or not he could do it all at the same time which was in question. In some respects he was similar to the girl I mentioned above. Well, he did do it right, and he passed.

Learning to drive just isn’t as simple as going from zero-to-hero for everyone. Some people will have problems with driving all their lives – and there is a lot of them out there. Until someone somewhere says they shouldn’t be driving, people like me will have to continue to take them to test after training them as best we can. For me, that’s not the same thing as just taking people to test who haven’t been trained at all.

Learner On Test Hit By Falling Lorry

I’m sure the pond life out there will have a field day over this one, but a learner driver was on her test near Lewisham when a lorry and a van were involved in a collision. The lorry tipped over and pushed her BSM car into a kerb.

The [DSA] added: “While the driving test can be a little daunting, most pass without incident and certainly expert driving tuition helps avoid any incidents of your own making. This was just an unfortunate freak incident and thankfully there was no harm done.”

She’ll get a free re-sit. She was completely blameless – as was BSM.

A Comet Of Sorts

I was thinking the other day about how the results of driving tests seems to go in cycles. It’s a bit like a comet, where your better abled pupils get stripped away in the tail, and although you add to the comet’s head by acquiring new pupils, the less abled ones who are ready for test comprise the rocky core. Periodically, it’s only those who are part of that core who are going to test – and that’s where most of the fails come from.A comet

I was struck by that one not long ago, when one particular pupil failed his second attempt. The examiner had told him after he failed the first time to put in for his test again straight away, and he interpreted that as not needing anymore lessons. Most of my pupils take a few more lessons on the run up to their next test. However, on the day of his second attempt it was clear that he’d gone off the boil a little more than most.

The thing is, you can’t force people to take lessons (especially if they can’t afford them). But anyone who has failed a test once already needs to be aware that it can be a false economy to not take any further ones between tests. At the very least, you need to keep driving and practising – and if you don’t have access to a car for private practice, then lessons with your instructor are the only sensible option.

In this guy’s case, he’d paid an extra £75 for a weekend test – but now he realises he will have to pay for another, and some extra lessons.

I was talking to another pupil today who has failed a test already. She’s a student, and I asked her how she normally revises coming up to an exam. You see, when I was at university, I never felt right unless I was actually sitting outside the exam room cramming for stuff I already knew. I realise that not everyone is like that, but equally I am certain that no one stops revising weeks before an exam. So why approach the driving test any differently?

Test Pass: 24/1/2014

TickThe train is well and truly back on track now. Well done Clive, who passed today first time with just two driver faults (both of them for the same thing).

He’s been another one who has been fun to teach (who could forget that recent lesson where he made several mistakes and was going to get out and walk  six miles home in the rain. That’s where “coaching” skills really come to the fore, and phrases like “put your toys back in the pram, and put that bloody seatbelt back on” get everything back in perspective).

Anyway, it means my overall pass rate for the year is at 60%, with the first-time figure being 100%.

Test Pass: 21/1/2014

TickWell done Mike, who passed on Tuesday first time with six driver faults. I’d had a couple of fails after that initial pass of the year, so Mike got the train back on track again.

It’s been hard for him, as driving doesn’t come naturally, but now he can realise his dream of driving down to visit his gran at the other end of the country. It’s little details like that which make this job really worthwhile.

Test Pass: 10/1/2014

TickI’m a bit late updating these, but well done to Katy who passed first time a couple of weeks ago with seven driver faults. It was my first test of the year, so a great way to start 2014.

She’s been fun to teach – I also taught her two brothers, who also passed first time a couple of years ago now. She was a big JLS fan, who did what I do when Rush tour and went to as many concerts as she could afford. In the end, the practical test was much easier for her than the theory (although we nailed that when we analysed why she’d been failing from her results sheets).