Archive - April 2011

Most Teen Crashes Due to Driver Error

A few posts ago, I mentioned how companies running surveys are wont to state the blindingly obvious as revelations from Heaven.

The Americans appear to be no different in this respect. The Mercury of Pottstown, PA, has chosen to inform us (that link seemed to stop working while I was writing this – I assume it is temporary) that most crashes involving teen drivers are caused by driver error! To be fair, it is not The Mercury, but The Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia and State Farm Insurance Companies who are the bringers of this hitherto unknown fact.

Over here, we call ad hoc surveys of a relatively small number of participants “research”. In the States they call it “a study”.

The “study” reveals that common “critical errors” include:

  • going too fast
  • not looking and planning ahead
  • being distracted by something

They also concluded that the weather, vehicle faults, aggression, and falling asleep were not primary factors. I think they may have missed the point that although the majority of the 800 accidents they looked at may not have been due to those things, some of them definitely will have – especially drowsiness, aggression, and driving faulty vehicles. There are plenty of viral videos (and clips on the cop shows on TV) to confirm this.

This study helps dispel the myth that most teen crashes are due to aggressive driving or thrill-seeking,” said Allison Curry, lead author and a researcher at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia’s Center for Injury Research and Prevention. “Promoting safe driving skills is as important as preventing problem behaviors.”

Has she never heard of cause and effect? Or considered that some things might be related?

People often go too fast because they are driving aggressively. People often don’t plan ahead because they’re tired or distracted. There is no way an accident investigation can eliminate those things when speed, lack of planning, or distraction are identified.

I suspect the “study” was perhaps more concerned about finding something to justify that last sentence about promoting driving skills.

Coventry Sleuths

I saw this story in the Coventry Telegraph – they’ve done a “freedom of information” request to the DSA and discovered that someone who lives in Coventry has taken and failed their driving test 24 times before passing. I think the whole thing has been prompted by that woman who failed her test 90 times (reported in March this year).

All the tests were from, the same test centre – and one candidate there even passed in 26 tries, although they had taken tests in various locations.

The DSA will not name the person (quite right), so at the end of this article the Telegraph asks:

Do you know the city’s most persistent learner driver? If so call Telegraph reporter Sam Dimmer on…

I’m not sure I agree with that. To be honest, it’s not really anyone’s business except the person involved – though I’m sure a financial incentive might make them more amenable to being identified publicly.

A driving instructor interviewed for the article makes a valid point – albeit in an obscure manner, though I suspect that that might be to do with the editing rather than the point he made. I would also agree that someone who takes that long and that many tries might not be the best driver in the world.

A follow up story by the Telegraph reveals that the driver in question is a man “according to sources in the city”.

Now a host of people in the city believe they’ve identified the city’s most determined driver.

They say he’s in his twenties and lives in the Foleshill area, and since passing his test he’s been busy racking up miles on Coventry’s roads.

They’re bang out of order. It’s like winning the Lottery, asking for no publicity, then having some idiot newspaper reporter blow your cover. It could ruin your life (well, it could if you’d won the Lottery – but the point is the same).

Still, at least the junior hack has eased off – probably because his “sources” have provided a name and he’s been told he can’t spill the beans by his bosses:

Are you Coventry’s most persistent learner driver? If so call reporter Sam Dimmer on…

Drivers Admit Distraction

Putting on Make-up in the CarIt would appear that Santander is eager to join the bandwagon (and get some valuable publicity) by doing surveys – sorry, I mean “research” - and reporting the findings as earth-shattering epiphanies.

In this article, it is reported that 1 in 5 drivers has admitted to sending a text message while driving their car. It also reports that nearly all of them believe texting is the most dangerous thing a driver can do.

It then goes on to say that eating or fiddling with the car stereo has caused near misses for many drivers. Humorously, it says that this has occurred for 20% of women and 33% of men – implying that men are worse for being distracted.

Santander’s director of insurance then concludes that concentration is vital when behind the wheel. I hope you’re all taking notes, because this will be on the exam paper!

Interestingly – and seeing as it attempted to genderise (I made that word up again) the problem – I would point out that it didn’t mention smoking, putting on make-up, arseing about with the baby in the back seat, having a dog loose, having planks and other DIY stuff sticking out the window and waving about, and fiddling with your hair as potential distractions (amongst many others).

Everyone – regardless of gender – is capable of distracted driving.

On a lesson this morning with a pupil who is not very confident on the road at the moment, she said that she was worried about her kids in the back when she passed and the radio being distractions. So I said we’d try driving home with the radio on.

She went completely to pieces and we had to turn it off.

Theory Tests in Cumbria

The Workington/Carlisle Area of CumbriaI wrote recently about the impending cessation of theory testing in Workington, Cumbria, and the transfer of theory testing facilities to Carlisle. Those wishing to take the theory test will now have to travel 32 miles.

It is worth noting from a map of the area that anyone who doesn’t live in Workington already has to travel – perhaps not 32 miles, but they still have to travel. In fact, for people not living in Workington, they will quite possibly have to travel almost the same distance to Carlisle that they already do to Workington.

Cumbria is not exactly the most densely populated county in England.

The News & Star – the same publication that reported on the original story – is now stirring the pot a little more. The DSA has stated quite clearly that there are no plans to stop the practical test in Workington. It has said:

There are no plans to withdraw the practical test service from Workington.

Now, if you are a driving instructor or a local MP (or a twopence ha’penny newspaper) then it is as plain as day that the DSA has stated categorically that it is planning to move practical driving tests to anywhere you want to imagine up out of thin air! Carlisle… Newcastle… Leeds… there’s no limit to what can be read in the statement “there are no plans to withdraw the practical test service from Workington”.

New Irish Testing System

I’ve written recently about the changes to the Irish driving test. I’ve only scratched the surface with the links I referred to – it has been a hot topic in Ireland for some weeks now.

Basically, anyone wishing to get a licence over there has to complete a minimum number of hours with an instructor and cover a specific syllabus provided by the Irish authority.

Naturally, something like this couldn’t possibly run completely smoothly seeing as driving instructors are involved, and it appears those in Ireland are no less ready to oppose any change than those over here are.

But talk about shooting yourself in the foot.

This report in the Journal - and it is one of many I have seen over the last few weeks – is actually encouraging people to shop around to get the cheapest deals. Its headline trumpets:

Huge savings can be made by L-drivers who shop around for lessons

The body of the report says that the National Consumer Agency – a group which hasn’t lost the plot, because it clearly didn’t have it to start with – says that there are huge discrepancies in prices, with lesson prices varying between €25 and €45, with the average around €33.

Yes. That’s because some instructors are cutting their prices to try and win business. Price-cutting is the strategy of the loser, and the chances are that in general the quality will be better from those charging the higher prices in any given location. Note that I said “in general” and “the chances are”.

If someone can command a rate of €33 or more, they are probably not bad at what they are doing. If someone has to cut their price to try and win business away from those higher-charging ADIs, then possibly they either aren’t performing well enough to command higher prices, or they are putting themselves in a position where they perhaps won’t be able to perform.

The cost of living in Ireland is such that €33 is the equivalent of about £25-27 over here. So someone charging €25 is asking the equivalent of about £20 over here – a £5-7 undercut.

If you cut prices, you cut profit; and if you cut profit, you need to look to cut overheads. Fuel is an overhead.

Organisations like these should keep their noses out unless they know what they are talking about. Ireland is trying to bring its antiquated learner system into the 21st century, yet these opponents – all of them – are pushing it backwards.

The article makes no mention of shopping around for quality. It’s only point is price.

EDIT 21/4/2011: This article in Waterford Today is interesting – it summarises the Irish system.

Changes for learner drivers

Question: I turn 17 in April and I want to learn how to drive a car. What do I need to do?

Answer: Before you begin to learn to drive on public roads in Ireland, you must hold a learner permit covering the category of vehicle you wish to drive. You must pass a theory test and get a theory test certificate before your first learner permit will be granted.

If you take out a first-time learner permit after 4 April 2011 you must do mandatory Essential Driver Training (EDT) with an approved driving instructor (ADI). The course is 12 hours for car licences and 16 hours for motorcycle licences. (This measure has been in place for learner motor cycle drivers since 6 December 2010). You do not need to do the lessons if your first learner permit was issued before 4 April 2011.

When you start your first EDT lesson, you will be given an official logbook by your ADI to record the details of your training and progress. A sample logbook is available on rsa.ie.

When you complete an EDT lesson, your ADI will stamp the relevant section of your logbook and record feedback on how well or whether you met the lesson objectives. An ADI can only sign the lessons they have given so you must make sure that your logbook is updated by your ADI after each lesson.

For both car and motorcycles, you will have to present evidence of having taken the lessons before sitting a driving test (your logbook for car lessons or your certificate for motorcycle lessons).

When you are learning to drive you must be accompanied at all times by, and be under the supervision of, someone with a current driving licence for a car. Also, the person accompanying you must have had the driving licence for at least two years.

You can find a full list of approved driving instructors on the website of the Road Safety Authority at rsa.ie. You can get the application form for a learner permit (D.201) from your Motor Taxation Office or you can request Form D.201 by post through citizensInformation.ie. It is not available to download online.

Further information is available from the Citizens Information Centre below.

This column has been compiled by Waterford Citizens Information Centre Ltd., 37 Lower Yellow Road, Tel:051-351133 which provides a free and confidential service to the public. Open 10am-1pm & 2-5pm e-mail: waterford@citinfo.ie Citizens Information is also available on-line at http://www.citizensinformation.ie or at National Lo-Call 1890 777 121.

Pass Plus is Not Dead

Pass Plus LogoAnd quite rightly so.

The South Yorkshire Times mentions a DSA promotion where new drivers who have taken the Pass Plus course can claim a free road safety kit from selected Jet garages.

My only criticism is that it is the first five clamants at each garage, and only at two garages - it should be much bigger and wider than that. But that isn’t the DSA’s fault. This idiotic coalition masquerading as a government is forcing them to keep miniature test centres open in run down areas and still make cut backs.

Pass Plus is an incredibly useful course. It’s only weakness is the people who deliver it.

RAC Up For Sale (Sold)

RAC LogoThe Express reports that Aviva has put struggling motor rescue company, RAC, up for sale.

Top of the list of bidders is private equity firm Clayton, Dubilier, and Rice – they bought car auction firm BCA last year and also hold a stake in Hertz car rentals. Apparently, Carlyle – also a stakeholder in Hertz – is also in the race.

EDIT 24/6/2011: And Carlyle has won after paying £1bn, according to Sky.

Test Pass: 18/4/2011

Tick!Well done to Stephen, who passed this morning with 6 driver faults.

He was nervous (and shaking), but that sandwich while we ran through the show-me-tell-me questions helped!

The examiner said he was nervous, but all right once he got going. Three of the faults were for signalling a little early – which was over-compensation for signalling late (which I picked up on during the pre-test drive).

Must Bite Lip… Must Bite Lip…

I was out with a pupil this morning. She’s taken her test before - she’s one of my failees (I made that word up) this year.

When she’s driving, the best way I can describe her mind is by thinking of something which is completely random and all over the place – and then imagining something 100 times worse than that.

She has this habit of jamming the brakes on then immediately releasing them (causing bounce back), no matter how much she’s slowed down for the hazard. Since I took her on, I’ve been trying to get her to use the bite more instead of just stopping (and she doesn’t always use the handbrake when she does), so today we were driving up a slope towards some traffic lights to turn right. She’s slowed right down and the lights are going to change any second. The split second before they change, on go the brakes – then she panics, takes her foot off the brake (no handbrake, of course), the car bounces backwards and we begin rolling back down the hill.

I duelled the car, made her put the handbrake on, and then move off properly. Fortunately there was no one behind us. I pulled her over and this is what passed (and bear in mind that we have a laugh so this isn’t the way it seems):

Me: What have we said about using the handbrake?

She: Make up your mind – one minute you’re telling me to use the gas and bite, and then you’re telling me to use the handbrake.

Me: Yes, but you have to use them properly and at the right times. There’s no point slamming on the brakes when you’re on a hill like the north face of the Eiger and expecting to be able to find the bite without it rolling back or stalling.

She: There was nobody behind, so what does it matter?

Although the banter was fun, it is frustrating when people come out with explanations like that.

Then, a little later, we were doing a turn in the road on an industrial estate. Now, she has this habit of talking as a defence for what might happen – it’s almost like if she says “I know I’ve f***ed this up”, then if she actually does it won’t matter as much because she already predicted it. I’ve mentioned it to her before.

So we’re on this industrial road and the longer we arse about doing a manoeuvre the more chance there is of something turning up – thus increasing the chances of screwing it up as panic sets in. She starts the procedure and immediately starts yacking about something…

Me: Shut up and concentrate.

[first stage completed perfectly. Slip it into reverse gear, look all around, see a car approaching from the right, chewing gum comes flying out of her mouth, she lunges for it as it sticks temporarily in her hair, then spins off on to the central console near the handbrake. We’re sitting in the middle of the road blocking it at this time]

She: [tries to find the chewing gum wherever it landed]

Me: LEAVE IT. GET A MOVE ON – WE’RE BLOCKING THE ROAD.

She: Where’s it gone? [starts looking again]

Me: GET ON WITH IT. WE’RE IN THE WAY [take handbrake off and start barking instructions to finish the manoeuvre. I get her to pull over and sit with my head in my hands]

She: Where did it go?

Me: It’s there. Throw it out the window. Why on earth did you do that while we were in the middle of the manoeuvre.

She: I can’t help it if my chewing gum comes out of my mouth.

Me: That’s not what I meant. We were blocking the road with a car waiting and you just sat there worrying about your chewing gum, which wouldn’t have come out if you’d keep your mouth shut when you’re doing things.

She: It’s not like we were on the A52 or anything.

I just gave up. And she wants to pass so she can drive her kids around!

Even worse, I was out with another pupil this afternoon. This one is going to be real hard work for more than one reason (she is strapped for cash, wants to pass as soon as possible, has a boyfriend from a country where bribery to get a licence is compulsory and who believes that everyone should pass after one lesson over here otherwise they’re being ripped off, and who - unfortunately – is absolutely not a natural driver). In fact, I’ve already suggested she might want to consider the automatic route because of her clutch control (or lack, thereof), but she wants a manual licence.

She only takes one hour lessons, and can only book up to a week in advance (which is difficult when my diary is almost full three weeks out at any time), but I have to be on my guard every second, because literally anything could happen at any time. Kerbs, other cars, pedestrians…

So, we stopped at a set of lights. She reaches into the door pocket and starts checking her mobile phone for texts! I told her to put it back and leave it alone. Then I pulled her over and the conversation went:

Me: What you just did is illegal. You can get points on your licence and a fine for doing that. Only yesterday someone was jailed for reading texts on a mobile, when they lost concentration and killed someone.

She: Yes I know. I was just checking my texts from work.

Me: I know you were checking texts – I just told you that. It doesn’t matter who they’re from it’s still illegal.

She: Yes, but I’m expecting a call from work and I was checking.

I still don’t think the message got through.

(Note to any ADI sitting there thinking “she’s not test ready” on that first pupil – you don’t know the full story, so don’t make up the parts in between. The pupil is quite capable of driving properly and passing the test, but she’s also quite capable of total stupidity. My job as an ADI is to deal with the driving part – not the stupidity part.)

Despatch: April 2011

April 2011: Despatch DownloadThe April issue of Despatch is now available (I didn’t get a notification this month). Click the logo to download a copy.

In this issue they look at having observers on test one year after it was introduced, the Highway Code celebrating its 80th, a skit on CPD, the opinions of someone who teaches the deaf, a summary of that story about an ADI who was imprisoned for her part in a bribery conspiracy (an examiner is awaiting sentence), and a few odds and ends.