Finland Relaxes Learning To Drive Rules

Flag of FinlandThis story in a Finnish news journal caught my eye – initially because the translated title is ambiguous, saying “Anyone can teach driving a car”.

In fact, the story gets more interesting when you realise that at the moment, driving schools and family members are the only ones who can teach people to drive in Finland. Parents are not even allowed to teach their own kids if they’re not living at the same address.

However, from January next year this is going to change. In theory, anyone will be allowed to teach learners to drive – but police will decide who to award teaching permits to.

The change is actually a common sense one. The family restriction must be hellishly difficult for people in many cases, and it doesn’t really alter the quality of instruction the learner receives. The supervising driver – the Finnish source calls them “instructors”, which is another translation ambiguity – must have held a licence for 3 years, use a training vehicle with secondary brakes fitted, and have passed a special test. The permit granted will last for 9 months (which it does at present).

Even this is far more stringent than what we have in the UK.

The Finnish system will also require that every learner take special training with a proper driving school. The article also implies that more hours will be required, but it doesn’t go into any detail.

What a shame UK politician haven’t got the balls to introduce something even close to this.

Welsh Prat Banned (Again) And Jailed

Mark Griffiths is one of that special breed of man. Specifically, he looks like a man, but is actually pond life slime.

According to this article in Wales Online, his achievements amount to the following:

  • ploughed into another car leaving four people needing hospital treatment
  • 15 previous court appearances for 62 other offences
  • 14 convictions for driving while banned
  • leaving the scene of an accident (with wheel spin)
  • failing to report an accident
  • skidmarks 10m long
  • lying to police about being involved
  • aggravated vehicle taking
  • driving without a licence/while disqualified
  • driving without insurance
  • driving under the influence of alcohol

But hey! His defence lawyer, Laurence Jones, said he had shown “genuine remorse”. Fortunately, the Recorder (or Magistrate) knew that this was complete bullshit, saying:

You are a menace to road users. You cannot or will not learn from the sentences the court has imposed on you in the past.

Rarely, if ever, have I seen a motoring record that compares to yours. It is appalling. I regret the powers I have are so limited.

He was jailed for 16 months (so he’ll be out just after Christmas, probably) and banned for 3 years.

DSA Advice: Overtaking

Another DSA advice email from the Highway Code that I missed. This one is about overtaking:

Rule 168

Being overtaken. If a driver is trying to overtake you, maintain a steady course and speed, slowing down if necessary to let the vehicle pass. Never obstruct drivers who wish to pass. Speeding up or driving unpredictably while someone is overtaking you is dangerous. Drop back to maintain a two-second gap if someone overtakes and pulls into the gap in front of you.

Rule 169

Do not hold up a long queue of traffic, especially if you are driving a large or slow-moving vehicle. Check your mirrors frequently, and if necessary, pull in where it is safe and let traffic pass.

Read all the rules about overtaking (162-169)

 

DSA Advice: Road Junctions

One I missed. The DSA has some advice about road junctions from the Highway Code:

Rule 170

Take extra care at junctions. You should

  • watch out for cyclists, motorcyclists, powered wheelchairs/mobility scooters and pedestrians as they are not always easy to see. Be aware that they may not have seen or heard you if you are approaching from behind
  • watch out for pedestrians crossing a road into which you are turning. If they have started to cross they have priority, so give way
  • watch out for long vehicles which may be turning at a junction ahead; they may have to use the whole width of the road to make the turn
  • watch out for horse riders who may take a different line on the road from that which you would expect
  • not assume, when waiting at a junction, that a vehicle coming from the right and signalling left will actually turn. Wait and make sure
  • look all around before emerging. Do not cross or join a road until there is a gap large enough for you to do so safely.

Effective observations are a vital skill new drivers need to develop.

DSA Advice: Rules For Pedestrians

An email alert with Highway Code advice from the DSA for pedestrians:

Rule 22

Pelican crossings. These are signal-controlled crossings operated by pedestrians. Push the control button to activate the traffic signals. When the red figure shows, do not cross. When a steady green figure shows, check the traffic has stopped then cross with care. When the green figure begins to flash you should not start to cross. If you have already started you should have time to finish crossing safely.

Rule 23

Puffin crossings differ from pelican crossings as the red and green figures are above the control box on your side of the road and there is no flashing green figure phase. Press the button and wait for the green figure to show.

From my own experience, drivers should be on the lookout for people who totally ignore crossings and just walk out – often with their heads buried in their mobiles. It’s a growing problem.

Driving Lessons For 12-year Olds In Australia

This is what happens if you hit a kangarooBack in February I commented on a publicity stunt by a school which had found a very unique selling point for its driving lessons. Quentin Willson – a self-styled driving expert and pistonhead (and ex-presenter of Top Gear) – was championing it.

Well, it looks like someone over in Oz has got hold of it and is similarly passing it off as a great idea with heaps of fuzzy logic and contradictory information.

Australia has its own problems with maniac young drivers frequently wrapping themselves round Eucalyptus trees and unsuspecting kangaroos. In spite of this, the insane idea that the problems can be solved by encouraging kids – and I mean young children – to drool over cars and give them access to the keys has still surfaced.

The Confederation of Australian Motor Sport (CAMS) is behind the initiative and keen for the program to be funded by government and used in all secondary schools across Australia.

The pilot, being run in Adelaide, will try to teach 12 to 18-year-olds good driving habits before they can pick up any bad habits from their parents or friends.

Sue Evans is a four-times Australian Rally champion with partner Simon and is taking part in a trial of the program at Heathfield High School in the Adelaide hills.

I like the word “oxymoron”. Having a motor sport group style itself as road safety advocate is a good example of one. Having a rally driver championing it is another:

With a teenage son learning to drive, she says the family is passionate about educating the young on good driving.

“As a rally car co-driver, I take road safety very seriously,” she said.

Just because someone has kids and drives a car – and quite a few people do, though this simple fact seems to escape many – doesn’t necessarily make them experts on road safety. And being a rally driver certainly doesn’t. I can think of at least two examples of racing drivers from the recent past who didn’t actually hold driving licences, so all their “skill” was on the track.

Children should be kept away from cars proper until they’re old enough to drive legally. And parents of children who can’t wait should be dealt with as unfit in many cases.

Giving lessons to 12-year olds is not the way to deal with underage driving. Either over here or anywhere else. It’s just the way the weak-minded get round dealing with the real problem.

Teenager Arrested Driving at 89mph in 30mph Zone

This is why insurance is so high for teenagers – because of dickheads like this as-yet unnamed 18-year old.

He was driving through a village 30mph zone and was clocked at 89mph. As the police said, if anyone walking home had stepped out he would have had no chance of stopping.

He was driving a red Fiesta and failed to stop for police. They later traced him and arrested him, but released him on bail. If it were me, I’d have kept him locked up because our wonderful legal system will probably let him off lightly if the case ever makes it that far.

Millionth Uninsured Vehicle Seized

The Guardian reports that UK police have seized their millionth uninsured vehicle (it was in the West Midlands). The report mentions that out of 34 million drivers in the UK, around 1.2 million are uninsured.

Since 2005, when police gained powers to seize uninsured vehicles, an average of 500 a day have been nabbed! About a third of those have ended up being crushed.

The article says that uninsured drivers kill 160 and injure 23,000 people a year. That’s quite frightening when you think about it.

This Motor Insurers’ Bureau (MIB) “research” (it’s actually just a survey-cum-press release) says:

New research* undertaken amongst communities in the West Midlands and West Yorkshire highlights that a third of people still do not understand the current laws on car insurance, so are risking fines of up to £5,000; points on their licence and having their cars seized by police. Some of the reasons cited by motorists living in these hotspot areas, include: the cost of motor insurance, not understanding the law and penalties, and a belief that they’ll get away with it.

I love the way they completely avoid mentioning the extremely significant cultural issues which are involved here. Even so, they contradict themselves in that paragraph.

On the one hand, they say people “do not understand” the law. Then, in the next sentence they say that those questioned say insurance in “too high” and believe “that they’ll get away with it”. So which is it, MIB?

The postcode areas in question have very significant demographics in terms of ethnicity and poverty, and it is clear that people are anxious to protect that aspect and avoid identifying it. Of course, if you are hit and killed by an uninsured driver, it doesn’t matter to you or your family who the driver was – you’re still dead, and the he was still uninsured.

But the police – and any other authority wanting to change things – should be very concerned about the obvious common denominators.

As I’ve said before, driving is a privilege, not a right. Of the people who drive uninsured, 95% of them KNOW that they are driving uninsured, and they know it is illegal.

Annoying Adverts 2012: II

Jarring NoteBack in May I mentioned a few annoying adverts I’d seen.

The Weight Watchers one faded very quickly, thank God. Ads with idiotic whistling are still high on the list of “original” ideas for most ad companies, especially for radio versions (Tesco’s whistled signature tune grates against my skull like fingernails on a blackboard).

But the Secret Escapes adverts is still going strong. The reason I mention it now is that looking through my stats I have hundreds of hits on the same/similar search term. Two today on “secret escapes advert annoying”. I STILL rush to mute it whenever it comes on.

EDIT: As of late 2014/early 2015 Secret Escapes has embarked on a new advertising drive. I must say that the woman is beginning to look a bit past it now.

The company in question appears to be one of those you’d see being laughed out of the Dragon’s Den. Who in their right mind would want to use their service is anyone’s guess, so how long they can stay in business has to be in question. I’m guessing the current overkill level of airtime is a last-ditch attempt at survival.

Strongbow still has the monopoly on effeminate men pretending to be all butch and giving a gutsy “ahhhhhhh!” after sipping less than a teaspoon of their drink after carrying a box up some stairs.

Doggie Dentures still cracks me up every time I see it. And so do the meerkat adverts (especially when you watch what’s going on in the background). Even the radio versions are funny:

Aleksandr: Janet from Northern Ireland writes “Dear Aleksandr, thank you for wonderful Sergei toy after I buy car insurance from “Compare The Market”. My dog has taken liking to him. I even find him trying to…” Ooooh. Too much information.

However, Direct Line’s TV ads are incredibly annoying and unfunny. They’re the ones with Z-list comedians showing exactly why they’re  Zed! Direct Line refers to their ads as “hilarious” on its own website.

Honestly, Direct Line. They’re not.

Drop In Numbers Taking Driving Tests

This BBC article points out that 200,000 fewer people took driving tests last year compared with 5 years ago. It then goes on to quote a 20-year old who “can’t afford lessons” and so is finding it “a lot harder to get a job”. Echoes of that American learner I mentioned a few days ago.

We need to put things into perspective here. There’s a recession on, and there are a lot of things that a lot of people can’t afford anymore. Now, that doesn’t mean that all those people can’t afford all of the same things – they each have different priorities.

But the learner they are quoting – Emma Radwanski – says:

…she can’t afford driving lessons.

“It makes it a lot harder to get a job,” [s]he said.

“It makes it harder to go and see my friends.

“It makes it harder just to go and do anything like the cinema, or shopping or just to go out.”

It sounds to me like she wants to have her cake and eat it. Standard practice used to be that when you wanted something badly, then you cut back on other things so you could save up and afford it. If you couldn’t do that, you went without.

But todays teenagers want everything. There’s no such thing as going without or – heaven forbid – waiting. They want it now. And if they can’t have it, then it must be someone else’s fault.

The BBC plays right into her hands by saying:

The cost of getting a licence and taking the theory and practical driving tests is £143.

That is a relatively small amount compared to the rising cost of lessons, fuel, MoT and insurance.

Lesson prices are NOT RISING. Whoever wrote that is a complete prat. They are falling to stupid levels because of all the idiot cheapos doing their level best to bankrupt themselves. And insurance is rising precisely because of the “I want it now” attitude many teenagers exude. MSN doesn’t make the same amateurish mistakes as the BBC in its version of the same news (minus Radwanski), but even it refers to lesson prices without engaging its brain.

I can tell both MSN and the BBC that back in 2005 I was charging the top end going rate, which was £22 an hour. Today – in 2012 – I am charging £23 an hour (also the top end going rate in my area). That’s a rise of 5%. Lord knows where they get their figures from.

Radwanski is then quoted in the BBC article:

…having to rely on friends and relatives leaves her feeling guilty and has given up trying to get a licence.

She said: “I don’t think I’ll ever be able to get a licence or save enough money to do lessons, to buy a car, to afford lessons, to pay insurance or to pay tax.

“That makes me feel awful.”

So even if she had a driving licence she couldn’t afford to buy a car, insure it, tax it, or run it? It would be hard to find any more things she (or the BBC) could blame in one short article.

I think Radwanski needs to grow up a little before she’s allowed anywhere near a car. After all, I had to when I learnt to drive. I couldn’t afford a car for over a year after I passed, and running it in the early days was a huge struggle.

Only a total loser writes off their entire life at 20. Everyone else finds a way forward.