William Houghton, 18, only passed his test 6 months ago, and had only had his Citroen Saxo for two weeks, when he lost control of his car driving at “about 50mph” (his own words) and injured two of his passengers. Both were hospitalised.
Houghton, who admitted driving without due care and attention on June 7, had passed his test six months earlier and had only had the Citroen for two weeks.
Houghton told the court he was very sorry for what he had done, thought he had been driving at about 50mph and put the accident down to inexperience.
Magistrates were suckered right in, and “applied discretion” in awarding him only 5 points, instead of 6, so that he wouldn’t be automatically banned and forced to take his test again. He was fined a total of over £300.
I’m sorry, but it’s a complete joke. There are new drivers out there who really do deserve a break, and yet don’t get one. But for luck, Houghton could have been apologising for killing two passengers. He had played out the new driver accident script to the letter.
Police in Edinburgh have launched an enquiry after a motorist was caught on camera eating a bowl of cereal while driving through the city centre. He was overtaking cyclists while he was doing it.
The car he’s driving looks like a Corsa, so I guess that puts it down to some sort of genetic problem.
The idiot deserves everything that is coming to him (assuming he gets caught). But it’s also worth pointing out that the video has been plastered all over the internet by the cyclist – called “Raging Bike” – who took it, along with various comments about the speed he was doing. I hope they had a calibrated speed gun in order to make the accusation about him exceeding 30mph (35mph is mooted).
Let’s also hope that the rightful prosecution of one blinkered idiot hasn’t been prejudiced by others.
If you Google “Raging Bike”, you’ll find that the person who crops up is not exactly pro-motorist. In fact, on one site where he is interviewed you get the impression that he is the character portrayed by Sylvester Stallone in the Rambo movies (particularly Rambo I and II) – except on a bike instead of an army truck or assault helicopter.
The Suffolk Free Press reports that a driving instructor, Philip Devereux, was on a lesson with a pupil and the car was involved in a collision with another vehicle. When breathalysed, he was found to be almost twice the legal limit! The incident occurred on 5 October 2013.
He was banned for 12 months, and fined a total of just over £300.
The story doesn’t mention whether or not his ADI badge will be revoked or not (nor does it mention if anyone was injured). But going by the book, it probably will be. What a way to end your career.
This made me smile. You have to remember that the claims of sexism are from the West – China doesn’t see it that way.
Police in Beijing have put out a series of advisories for female drivers via China’s equivalent of Twitter.
Some women drivers lack a sense of direction and while driving a car they often hesitate and can’t decide which road to take… Once they realize their mistake, they cause accidents by spinning the steering wheel in a panic.
[women drivers] are not able to find the way to their destination, even if they’ve been there many times.
Women drivers tend to panic following an accident… They usually draw a complete mental blank, providing opportunities for criminals.
These are just three of the pieces of advice. As you might expect, China’s female population isn’t taking it lightly. One candidate for the Dippy Blond Awards has replied:
This is discrimination! Many male drivers are idiots, too.
Obviously, Chinese feminists are less skilled when challenging alleged sexism than their Western counterparts.
Apparently, this advice comes hot on the heels (no pun intended) where a recent accident occurred after a woman’s high heel got stuck. Mind you, China’s journalists (certainly, their cartoonists) are similarly naive.
Goodyear has announced a new partnership with RED Driving School, through which the tyre manufacturer will disseminate safety information to learner drivers via a new website and social media campaigns. The new collaboration will run alongside Goodyear’s existing national driving academy initiative in UK schools.
I’m sure someone somewhere will benefit, but I can’t work out who.
I’ve had my HTC One for a good few months now – I got it immediately it went on sale. I called it a “superphone” then, and I really meant it. Unless HTC brings out something better, I can’t see there being any need to upgrade for a long time.
When you look at HTC’s overview, the phone really does do all those things, and it looks exactly like that. For example, I have the Theory (TT) and Hazard Perception (HPT) tests installed on it, and demonstrating to pupils how to do the HPT is extremely quick using the HTC One.
The video clips are pin-sharp, and at least one pupil has bought an HTC One after having seen it in action (many more have downloaded those apps in order to prepare for their TT appointment).
A great thing about the HTC is it’s sound. It’s hard to believe that such deep stereo sound is coming from something with such tiny speakers.
Another thing I love about it – more of an Android feature than just HTC – is that it syncs to the Bluetooth system in my car so that you can send and receive texts via the car system. The car will also read the texts to you. You can also make calls from the phonebook via voice or car radio keypad.
(Obviously, you don’t mess with any of this when you’re driving).
The HTC One is genuinely a beautiful phone, and it is just the right size – too many phones are simply too big, and look stupid.
It’s just hard to believe that HTC is in financial difficulties having produced so many superb phones.
There was an interesting segment on BBC’s Watchdog tonight. It dealt with a situation where people have been selling their mobile phones using an online site called Cash4Phones.
Apparently, when they enter their phone’s model number it gives them a price based on the phone being in reasonable condition. However, when they send it off, they receive an email telling them that the phone has excessive signs of use, and offering less than half of the original price that was given when the users initiated the process on the website.
I did a bit of scouting and found this blog entry (don’t be put off by the blog’s title – when it talks of “pert breasts” it is in the new-mummy-and-daddy sense, and apart from such dubious (and nauseating, when you have other peoples kids stuffed in your face – I say this in jest, and mean no harm to the blog in question) content, the article in question is quite interesting. It deals with the same firm, and the author’s own trials with them. Apparently, the money takes months to arrive – if it comes at all.
It’s also worth looking at the Trustpilot rating, and some of the comments on that.
The only thing I’d take issue with is the statement that Cash4Phones pays more than MazumaMobile. I did several checks and Mazuma pays more in each case. I’ve written about Mazuma on three previous occasions, and have never had even the slightest problem with them. Every transaction was completed from me clicking on “sell” to my bank account being credited (or the cheque arriving the time I clicked the wrong button) in less than one working week. And the amount paid was exactly what was originally quoted.
Watchdog submitted phones that had been checked by a phone repair company and certified as being in almost perfect condition, and an original quote of over £100 was downgraded to just over £40, with excessive signs of use being quoted. One of the victims featured even had to pay for the phone to be returned – but it wasn’t, and they upped their quote.
Based on the show (and the blog I’ve linked to, not to mention the Trustpilot figures), I think the advice is absolutely clear. In addition, I would recommend Mazuma to anyone wanting to sell their phone. People must be completely nuts (or plain greedy) to go anywhere else.
Well, it appears that the ban is not 100% supported by the Saudi male population, either. Comedian, Hisham Fageeh, has made a spoof video poking fun at the ridiculous claims and overall topic. It’s clever and funny, and to the tune of Bob Marley and the Wailers’ No Woman, No Cry.
You’d think that being over the drink drive limit, having no licence, and no insurance would mean that you’d give the police a wide berth if you were driving past them.
Mind you, to get like that in the first place you’d probably have had a certain kind of upbringing – and therefore if you saw your father, for example, as you drove by, and noticed that he had been stopped by the police for some reason, then you might decide to go and poke your nose in and see if you could “help” (even though there is no recorded case of some caveman ever managing to successfully “help” another caveman when he has interfere with police business like this).
And this is what happened to Leon Fitzpatrick from Sunderland. He’d been on the booze the night before and as he was driving to work he saw that his father had been pulled over. Up to this point the police weren’t even aware of his existence. But then he decided to go and poke his nose in, and that was when the officers noticed the smell of alcohol on his breath. Naturally, routine checks then identified the breaches of licence conditions.
His defence lawyer was Anna Haq – a name which I recognise from a story not long ago, but which I haven’t bothered to look up. Her pathetic mitigating comments were:
He would never have been arrested if he had not got out of that vehicle, there was no evidence of bad driving.
Ah, well that’s OK then. He could have then just gone and driven through a school crossing and everything would have been fine.
He was banned for 14 months and fined a total of £215.
Darren Jarvis, 42, was allegedly showing off in his sports car (reg. plate WH06 BAD – with a screw in the ‘6’ to make it read “WHOS BAD”) when he lost control at 100mph. He careered into another car and killed two male occupants, both married and each with two children.
Jarvis denies two charges of causing death by dangerous driving. He is claiming he had some sort of seizure and that he was driving at less than 100mph.
As the court case continued, it appeared that Jarvis accelerated hard and managed to go round a bend before losing control. He was also seen trying to wrestle control back after he’d lost it (it must have been a very strange sort of seizure he had). However, a witness at the scene reckons he was shaking and “frothing at the mouth”. Jarvis claims he can’t remember anything.
EDIT: The case is still on-going. There are several further updates, and summing up has concluded.