Multitasking

I saw some interesting comments recently which claimed that people can “do two totally different tasks at once”. It was part of a discussion about teaching techniques (as usual, the DSA was cast in the role of villain by one of them, but that’s another story).

MultitaskingWhen I’m teaching pupils, and particularly at the beginning of their training, absolutely the worst thing they can try to do is more than one thing at once. That’s because no one can do two or more things simultaneously – it just looks like they can once they become better at certain aspects of driving.

People mistakenly believe that “multitasking” means doing different things at the same time. When you analyse any such situation, it doesn’t mean that at all.

A good example is computer multitasking. Admittedly, with modern multi-core processors it IS possible for computers to perform tasks simultaneously – because the cores can behave as separate computers. However, the original multitasking approach was that the CPU would time-share and would cycle through various tasks a bit at a time. It did it quickly and efficiently, so that over a typical period of a few seconds it would appear to have simultaneously carried out several major tasks to completion. But in reality it had done them in small steps, dovetailing each step from one task with those from other tasks, creating an impression of having done several things at once.

Mind you, computers don’t have to think about what to do or how to do it. Humans – particularly new drivers – do. So when a pupil is steering round a corner, then decides to try to change gear or cancel the indicator, something usually has to give – and the steering is usually it!

This is one reason why novices often steer badly on bends and corners – they are trying to do several things simultaneously when they can’t yet do any of them properly! I often find that those who have simply been allowed to “drive” without any proper tuition or correction are the worst ones for it, and the longer they’ve been allowed to get away with it the harder it can be to break them of the habit.

This issue of multitasking comes into play when teaching manoeuvres, for example. Think of the stages involved in the first part of a turn in the road:

  • select gear
  • gas/bite
  • check it’s safe
  • respond if it isn’t
  • handbrake off
  • control speed
  • full lock
  • check it’s still safe
  • respond appropriately
  • watch the kerb
  • control speed
  • straighten and stop
  • handbrake
  • select reverse

Many pupils will start overlapping these when they first try it, and as soon as they take the handbrake off, if they move too fast they simply stop steering. Likewise when they look around, if they’re still steering at the time their hands just freeze.

I do a simple demonstration using a pen. I start the car moving slowly, pick up a pen, then do various things like removing the cap, replacing it, putting it on the dashboard, reading the writing on it, etc. All the time the car is moving at an absolute crawl.

Then I get the pupil to do it. Usually, the car speeds up and they can’t manipulate the pen.

I then explain how I am cheating. Whereas they are trying to control the car and the pen at the same time, what I do is as follows:

  • set the speed
  • pick up the pen
  • control the speed
  • remove the cap
  • control the speed
  • put the cap back on
  • control the speed
  • read some text
  • control the speed
  • put the pen on the dash
  • control the speed
  • and so on

This is proper multitasking, the way humans have to do it. It also illustrates why the MSM routine has to be done in plenty of time in order to prevent a new driver from changing gear when they should be concentrating on steering, or from looking in the mirrors when they should be slowing down.

Of course, as people get better some things can be done without thinking (cancelling indicators, for example). But while such things need conscious thought it is vital to keep them separate – particularly since the indicators are self-cancelling, and avoiding collisions is of much higher priority than unnecessarily cancelling a signal.

Multitasking in humans is an illusion created by doing single small tasks – each part of larger, more complex tasks – in an efficiently structured way. MSM is a prime example.

What is interesting is how you can see this potential for multitasking confusion spill over with certain pupils. You occasionally get one whose brain seems to be on fire, and the simple act of changing gear can result in attempts to signal, pull on the handbrake, reach for things which aren’t there, and so on. They’re all different, and finding ways to deal with the problem is what makes this job so interesting.

Another interesting aspect is how the old adage about women being better at multitasking doesn’t apply to driving in this respect. Women are better at juggling many things in their heads, whereas men tend to want to focus on single tasks. It’s why women can often be frustrating to men when they keep changing subjects, for example. In driving, everyone has the same problems with multitasking, with some – from both sexes – handling it better than others.

Jumping between tasks without completing the previous one can be a hindrance. Perhaps this is partly why men tend to pass in fewer lessons and have higher pass rates in the driving test.

Rush To Tour UK – May 2013

Fantastic news!!!!

Rush will be touring the UK in May, 2013, with their Clockwork Angels Tour. It’ll be just two Clockwork Angels Cover Artyears since they were last here by that time!

You can see more information on the Rush website. but arena dates are as follows:

  • 22 May – Manchester MEN
  • 24 May – London O2
  • 26 May – Birmingham LG
  • 28 May – Sheffield Motorpoint
  • 30 May – Glasgow SECC

It was just announced (8.45am) on Planet Rock, but isn’t even in their news section yet! Note that there is no Newcastle event this time (at the moment, anyway) – which is a surprise, as the Geordies gave one of the best receptions on the Time Machine Tour last year. The 2013 tour also covers several European dates.

Tickets go on presale this Thursday.

I’m going to do the grand circuit again and go to all of them. Already spoken to my ticket guy and he’s on the case.

Test Pass: 9/5/2012

TickWell done Matt, who passed with just 3 driver faults on Wednesday this week.

I could have killed him, as the faults were all for the same thing! Anyone learning should be aware of how closely they pass parked cars and other obstacles – examiners quite rightly take this very seriously.

He’s a really good driver. He managed to go from zero to pass in just 27 hours, and without the benefit of any private practice until a few weeks before his test. In all honesty, he would probably have still passed without it, but any extra practice is always good if it’s quality practice.

DSA Alert: Rules For Cyclists

The DSA has come up trumps with this reminder to cyclists about how THEY should behave on the roads.

Rule 66

You should

  • keep both hands on the handlebars except when signalling or changing gear
  • keep both feet on the pedals
  • never ride more than two abreast, and ride in single file on narrow or busy roads and when riding round bends
  • not ride close behind another vehicle
  • not carry anything which will affect your balance or may get tangled up with your wheels or chain
  • be considerate of other road users, particularly blind and partially sighted pedestrians. Let them know you are there when necessary, for example, by ringing your bell if you have one. It is recommended that a bell be fitted

Read all the rules for cyclists (59-82)

It’s almost laughable in some respects. You could probably count on the fingers of one hand the number of cyclists who are even aware that there are rules they’re supposed to follow, let alone be prepared to abide by them.

The Spandex boys – the ones who think they’re athletes, but aren’t – are the worst offenders. This year already seems much worse than usual. The Olympics has got them all worked up, I guess.

Reference Points Revisited

I mentioned these a few months ago, but I saw something this week that made me smile.

Mirrors Here signReference points – when established BY the driver FOR the driver – can be very useful. In fact, everyone uses them one way or another no matter how much they might try to deny it.

But I had to laugh the other day when I saw this on someone’s fence when I was on my way to pick a pupil up for a lesson.

From what I can gather, the lady’s husband put it there so that she doesn’t reverse into the garage when she parks on their driveway.

On the one hand, it is a good idea. But it could fail when you consider what might happen if the driver were to drive into her driveway forwards. It would need another sign to cover that eventuality.

And it still doesn’t allow for the different seating positions of a 5’ female compared with a 6’ 3” man, or the variation that would be introduced by distance from the fence.

As long as the stopping position wasn’t right up to the garage door then they’d probably get away with it, but it does illustrate the dangers of over-egging the reference point concept.

To be honest, all the husband had to do was put a small mark on the fence and say “don’t go further back than this”. But I have to admire his more literary approach to the situation.

DSA Alert: Roundabouts

Another one of the DSA’s timely reminders about parts of the Highway Code, this time concerning roundabouts.

Rule 186

Signals and position

When taking the first exit to the left, unless signs or markings indicate otherwise

  • signal left and approach in the left-hand lane
  • keep to the left on the roundabout and continue signalling left to leave

When taking an exit to the right or going full circle, unless signs or markings indicate otherwise

  • signal right and approach in the right-hand lane
  • keep to the right on the roundabout until you need to change lanes to exit the roundabout
  • signal left after you have passed the exit before the one you want

When taking any intermediate exit, unless signs or markings indicate otherwise

  • select the appropriate lane on approach to the roundabout
  • you should not normally need to signal on approach
  • stay in this lane until you need to alter course to exit the roundabout
  • signal left after you have passed the exit before the one you want

When there are more than three lanes at the entrance to a roundabout, use the most appropriate lane on approach and through it.

Read all the rules about roundabouts (184-190)

As I’ve mentioned previously, it’s a great idea to circulate this kind of information. Whether it works or not is another matter entirely – the understanding of roundabouts among the general public (including many of those who think they’re “advanced” drivers and can therefore drive around them any way they feel like) is appalling.

Also, don’t forget my own articles on roundabouts here and here.

DSA Alert: Examiner Strike May 2012

An email alert from the DSA advises people who have their tests booked May 10 to attend as normal.

PCS – the union involved – is obviously still determined to show the public what a bunch of prats it really is, whilst remaining under the impression that people are still mentally stuck in the Dark Ages with it, and are actually impressed by the idea of a strike.

As I’ve said before, not all examiners are in the union, and not all those who are get involved in strike action anyway.

If you’re worried, rearrange your test.

Why are the DSA on strike on May 10?

It isn’t specifically the DSA who are striking. It is various government bodies who are refusing to accept the government’s pension offer. Pensions are the latest tool in the armoury of those who prefer striking to working for a living.

The union involved claims it wants the government to “come to the negotiating table”. In plain English, this just means that they will not be happy until they get exactly what THEY want.

It isn’t just PCS either. The police are complaining about their pensions and are organising demonstrations. Unions involved cover the civil service, universities, schools, colleges, and the NHS.

The government has already made improved offers as a result of last year’s strikes, but as the union says, “these are not enough”. They demand a “fair settlement”. As I say, this amounts to EVERYTHING they are demanding, and nothing less will do.

Don’t forget that the tanker drivers are complaining about similar issues, which prompted the panic buying fiasco a few weeks ago. Pensions is the current hot topic.

Punitive Pettiness #2

I mentioned in Punitive Pettiness #1 that I often use industrial estates for lessons in the evenings when there’s no one around. Colwick MPTC (the driving test centre) is on one of these, and about ½ mile away is Colwick Quays Business Park.

I’ve been using this area for years at nights and weekends. It is usually dead out of business hours – apart from the occasional lorry doing a sleepover, or dog walkers taking their mutts to foul the wasteland round the back.

To be honest, I also think I provide a service, because when I’m there on a lesson I am a deterrent to anyone thinking of breaking into any of the units, the majority of which appear to be vacant anyway.

I cause absolutely no inconvenience whatsoever to the businesses or any of their employees. However, it is obvious that my mere presence is a problem to someone somewhere.

Colwick Quays has been there for years. In all that time it has not changed (other than for businesses which have gone bankrupt vacating various units from time to time. The picture below shows what the entrance looked like up until Friday of this week.

Colwick Quays as it wasThis one shows what it’s like now, with the shiny new barrier.

Colwick Quays now

Maybe it’s just my suspicious mind, but I’m convinced that simply because someone resented the presence of the occasional learner down there the cost associated with installing this barrier – a barrier which has been totally unnecessary since the place was built – is considered a worthwhile expense. Looking at the huge gaps, it’s hardly going to stop any footpads (or dog walkers). It’s specifically designed to stop “unauthorised” vehicles (i.e. learners).

I’m sure the businesses down that way will now prosper dramatically now that they have this shiny new barrier in place, and that it will result in enormous profits for them that they’ve been missing out on over the years.

The owners of the business park have tried to victimise driving instructors previously. They weren’t too eager to target anyone else – just instructors, and that’s in spite of the DSA being tenants on the land. Naturally, the end to private clamping no doubt put a damper on their source of satisfaction.

Mind you, although this particular location has typically been free from learners, over recent months a few more instructors have found it. I know of at least one who has been stupid enough to use the car parks back there during working hours when the tenants are actually using them. Prat!

As I’ve said before, some instructors are an olive short of a pizza. Their stupidity just plays into the hands of those petty-minded idiots who recoil at the idea of learners being allowed on the roads.

Punitive Pettiness #1

Sometimes, people will go to great lengths to apply punitive measures which are purely designed to get something that THEY want – usually at the expense of denying something to others.

I was at the test centre the other day and saw this letter pinned up on the noticeboard. This is the full text:

Dear Sir or Madam/Driving Standards Agency Representative

Appeal for Increased Community Sensitivity and Consideration from Driving Instructors and Driving Examiners

I am the local Neighbourhood Action Officer and I am writing on behalf of Nottingham City Council, Leen Valley Ward Councillors and local residents who live in the roads frequently used by Driving Examiners and Driving Instructors around of by Robins Wood Test Centre. I have been facilitating public meetings in this area, which are chaired by local councillors and are designed to enable residents to raise issues of concern and share ideas for improving the neighbourhood.

A serious and consistent issue has been brought up at meetings concerning the way Driving Examiners and Driving Instructors behave on the streets surrounding the test centre. I am requesting your help to reduce the impact of this problem.

The issues that have been raised are:

  • Litter thrown from cars
  • Parking in places which obscure visibility, cause obstruction and increase the risk of road accidents
  • Remaining stationery (sic) for long periods with the engine running in particular outside the bungalow at [number deleted] Prestwood Drive. A lady who lives in this bungalow has a serious lung condition which she believes is greatly worsened by the car fumes that come into her bungalow and she is unable to open her windows because of this.

I would like Driving Examiners and Instructors to be made aware of the stress their behaviour is causing the local community. We appreciate that everyone on the road was a learner once and we fully recognise the need for such valuable resource for the city, but if it is possible for Driving Examiners and Instructors to alter their routes a bit to ensure disruption to local residents is spread about a wider area this would mean a lot to the surrounding community.

We also request that Driving Examiners and Instructors support us by parking in places which are safe to do so and do not obstruct visibility, and by not dropping litter out of their cars. If it is possible to turn your engines off if you are stationery (sic) for a while this would be greatly appreciated. In particular if cars could refrain from using the corner find a range of different corners to use this would huge improve the quality of life of lady with lung problems.

I have been to the Test Centre on Chalfont Drive and made them aware of the situation and requested their co-operation, but if there is anything you can do to help in addition to this, I would be most grateful. If you would like to chat through any suggestions you might have to help the situation please get in touch, whichever way is best for you. Whatever you feel you can or cannot contribute I would appreciate a reply to this letter and look forward to hearing from you.

Yours faithfully

Have you ever read such emotive or libellous nonsense?

Although I use Chalfont Drive Test Centre, I can honestly say I have never used the corner referred to on Prestwood Drive. The road isn’t that quiet, and for as long as I can remember there has been a bloody notice up in the test centre waiting room asking people not to use Prestwood Drive because of residents’ complaints (probably, ONE resident in particular, judging from this). I honestly can’t recall seeing any other instructor using it because of the nature of the road – the test centre is about ¼ mile down and there is a school opposite. On weekdays it’s too busy.

In any neighbourhood you always get one habitual complainer and since modern councils are staffed by weak-minded idiots, they end up spending a disproportionate amount of their time and money involving themselves in things that simply aren’t worth the effort, but which tick all the necessary politically correct boxes.

The junction in question is shown below. Note the school to the left and Prestwood Drive to the right.

Prestwood Drive and Manning SchoolWith all due respect to “the lady” who has complained, if car fumes are affecting her lung condition – and I seriously doubt that – the effect will be a thousand times worse as a result of the mummies and daddies who park dangerously outside the school for hours at a time when they come to pick up their little darlings (the school “specialises in the dramatic arts”, so you can imagine the mummy-o-meter being off the scale most of the time). It’s horrendous down there most of the day, and not from learners. The specific complaint here is against learners – not car fumes – and it is part of a concerted attempt by someone to get their own way (the notice at the test centre being part of the campaign).

That leads on to the other ridiculous accusation about dangerous parking and increasing the risk of accidents. The standard of driving around that area is appalling, and it is NOT learners who are to blame. The only direct effect you could attribute to learners is that their mere presence makes the average jackass who lives around there (or who goes to pick up the next generation of Big Brother applicant from that school) drive even more dangerously than usual.

And as for “dropping litter”: someone should take the stupid idiot who wrote the letter to court over that. It’s just libel, and spawned by old dears who want learners – all except their grandchildren, obviously – banned from the roads.

Using me as an example, this is how it works. I’ve already said I don’t use Prestwood Drive (and never have). I do use Aspley Park Drive a couple of times a week. I do use the retirement bungalow estate between Beechdale Road and Wigman Road a couple of times a week (several roads on there are subject to “please don’t” notices in the test centre, and I avoid those). I do use areas in Bramcote a several times a week. I do use lots of other areas, too. I travel as far as Bingham to do manoeuvres – even with pupils who will do their tests at Chalfont Drive – because I can take in different road types. I use industrial estates all over the city (see Punitive Pettiness #2) in the evenings when they’re not in use. And so it goes on.

The bottom line is that if some Neighbourhood Watch Official, just out of college and with a shiny new NVQ in Local Government Affairs, decides to take a single road out of context with all of what I do, then I am suddenly a Criminal against The Community.

The author of that letter is very naive if she thinks moving the problem elsewhere will solve anything. She’s also even  more naive if the can’t see that it is just a handful of chronic whingers she is siding with. If she satisfies all of them, there are plenty more ready to crawl out of the woodwork on every street in the county.