NatWest, RBS, Ulster Bank… Blamefest

Most people will have heard about the problems affecting NatWest and The Royal Bank of Scotland over the weekend. The latest news still makes the outlook for these banks (and Ulster Bank) rather bleak.

More interesting (to some people, I would guess) is The Register’s findings.

I had a pupil last year who worked for RBS, and she was made redundant from a call centre as part of “streamlining” (aka cost-cutting exercise). The Register suggests that cost-cutting has gone so far that it has led to a much lower quality end product (that’s my phrasing, by the way, but it is what they are saying). They claim that outsourcing to India is to blame.

Before I go on, I would point out that I have no problem whatsoever talking to a person in India if I have a problem with an account or bill. Unfortunately, a lot of people do, and that’s because they’re racists. Oh, I know they start every sentence with “I’m not a racist, but…”, but they ARE. It’s almost a condition of being a middle-aged white British person to be so these days.

I have to confess that when you contact a call centre (often outsourced) it’s a bit annoying if you can’t understand the person you’re talking to, but for me that’s only a problem when the centre is located in Scotland (I have a real problem understanding the Scots accent, and they always sound like they want to beat me up or something). Indian call centre staff tend to speak clearly and pleasantly using very good English. Call centres are only annoying when they don’t help you. Where they are located is otherwise pretty much irrelevant.

The Register has interviewed people who were made redundant by RBS in the previous rounds of cost-cutting. Such people are hardly going to be the most objective source of information about RBS and its inner workings, so you have to take what they say with a large pinch of salt – and plenty of sugar to mask the bitterness which clearly spills out.

According to the story, the problems at RBS and NatWest this week were down to a software upgrade which failed. The software involved is responsible for automatic processing of routine tasks – it’s known as batch scheduling software – and the upgrade took place last Tuesday, which is when the problems began.

The story then goes into nebulous territory by quoting certain ex-employees who claim that the problem was solely down to the fact that the software contract was outsourced to India. When it is put like that – and when you look at how the ex-employees have said it, with inverted commas and the like – it isn’t outsourcing per se that is at the root in the minds of these people, but the fact that it was outsourced to India.

I usually respect what The Register has to say (and how it says it), but the fact that it then starts reproducing Indian job ads for the specific roles in question smacks of xenophobia. It seems to want to stoke the fire.

PPI Palaver

I have had a PPI claim upheld which – when I eventually get it – will be a nice little windfall. But the key word in there is “eventually”.

CashWe’re in the 21st Century, but it drives me crazy that I can only pay cash into my account specifically at one of my bank’s branches. That means having to get to a high street somewhere, with parking and fuel costs, not to mention the general inconvenience (don’t get me started on old people waiting in the West Bridgford car parks without buying a ticket while their spouse does the shopping, blocking everyone else). And when I get there I have to keep my fingers crossed that there isn’t a queue, because it seems that 99.9% of other bank customers use the places for the sole purpose of raising impossibly complex queries that take ages to resolve and tie the only cashier working up for ten minutes. Even with just a couple of people in the queue and more than one cashier working (which isn’t often at Halifax), this can lead to a 10-15 minute wait just to deposit cash and cheques..

At my local branch they have a fast-deposit machine. That’s a very funny joke, because it isn’t fast at all (though admittedly it’s usually slightly faster than going to the cashiers’ desk when it’s working), and doubly so when someone else is trying to use it and is reading every single word on the screen and putting their money in all mixed up (and why the bloody hell do they then go straight to the withdrawal machine to check that it’s gone in? The other one just told you it had accepted your deposit, and you got a receipt. It’s the same system. Are you really that stupid?) Anyone over 35 – except for me – should be kept away from the automatic system, or maybe even forced to use a bank specifically for old people who are frightened of technology and who don’t trust banks with their money!

But all banks seem to want to raise bureaucracy to new heights in every area of their business. You see, the PPI refund I am waiting for to appear in my account is being paid by another bank – one I was with many moons ago and which stopped being a bank, hence my move elsewhere. I got a call from them on 30 May telling me the claim had been upheld, and that a letter would be sent out within 10 days for me to accept the offer formally.

We could have sorted it all out on the phone there and then, but that’s not how banks work. Instead, I had to wait 10 days – and we’re talking about WORKING days, so there were two weekends in the middle – for the letter to arrive, and that was after discovering that after the 30 May conversation the letter only went out on 6 June (oh, it was ordered on 30 May, they told me, but it wasn’t printed until a week later). I now learn that they will pay out “within 28 days” of receiving the acceptance form. Of course, the chances of that turning out to be much less than 28 days are extremely remote. I assume that the interest they’ll be earning on my money will pay for all the unnecessary arseing about involved – albeit only at their end.

Then this week, in a totally separate incident, a household bill for £200 I had paid by debit card last week was charged again by standing order – in other words, I have paid £400 instead of £200. The second £200 was removed from my account in ten seconds flat, but I now learn it will take “3 working days” for it to be credited back – and with the weekend now looming (thanks to the day and half already taken to discuss it and agree it WAS an error and not some fraudulent claim by a Master Criminal) that means Monday at the earliest.

Why is it that money can be taken in the blink of an eye, and yet giving it back takes forever?

I’m keeping my eye on services like Barclays Pingit. On paper it is a great idea, but until all banks offer something similar the extra hassle of topping up a separate “wallet” account for non-Barclays customers means it isn’t going to be that useful for taking lesson payments (the crap internet phone signal and/or availability is another downside).

But anything that removes the need to physically visit a branch or cash point can’t be all bad.

ADI Number When Booking Your Test

This is an old post. Nowadays (2022), you do not need to register separately to allow your ADI number to be used. It comes as part of the package when you access the instructor booking system, and has done for several years. However, if your pupils book their own tests, they still need to use your ADI number if you want to avoid overlapping tests. They can leave it blank as long as you are happy the date/time they are booking fits your diary, but if they use it then it helps you for any that YOU might be booking.

When you book your test using the DSA online booking facility, there is a box which asks for your instructor’s ADI number. On one of the forums frequented by student types, someone asked what it is.

I love this reply:

…its only asked for so your instructors pass/fail rate can be adjusted i think, but when you take your test they write it on the sheet

I wish people who don’t know the answers to questions wouldn’t keep trying to guess like this! People go away believing it.

Every ADI has an instructor number, and it is printed on their green badge. However, it is not a requirement that the green badge be displayed when someone takes their test, and many ADIs deliberately take it out so the examiner can’t record their number on the driving test report form. The radicals take it out just to be awkward, and people who want their pass rate to look artificially high (plus those who aren’t confident in their abilities as instructors) also remove it. I always leave mine in unless I am taking a pupil to test who I haven’t actually taught (and I stopped doing that years ago).

The reason the booking system asks for an ADI number is so that when pupils book their tests, the system can check against that number and prevent them booking a test at the same time as someone else’s with the same instructor. It’s potentially a good idea.

However, you (the ADI) have to register to make use of it, and a small criticism of the DSA (now, DVSA) is that although they may dream of a paperless society they are still as bureaucratic as hell. I’ve never had the inclination to follow the convoluted (last time I looked) registration process through. (Edit: this article was written in 2012, and as of 2014 is it much easier using the Business Gateway system).

Another reason for not bothering to use it for test bookings is that I simply tell pupils not to book a certain date or time, and they don’t. You can’t get simpler than that. And for 40 weeks of the year I have a maximum of one test per week. There are a few weeks where I might have up to three, but the density of test bookings isn’t sufficiently high to justify a complicated system to manage it for me.

And the last problem – which is actually the answer to the usual query when someone encounters that box when booking their tests – is that if you just leave it blank then you move on to the booking stage. You don’t need to fill it in, and if an ADI hasn’t registered it will return an error anyway. But this means that even if the instructor has registered, a pupil could leave it blank or type it in wrong (i.e. someone else’s number) and you’d still end up with a double booking.

Perhaps one day it will be a mandatory requirement, but it isn’t at the moment.

What is the ADI Number when I’m booking my test?

Explained above. Unless your instructor has specifically given you the number, just leave it blank.

I changed my instructor – should I change the ADI number I used to book my test?

You may as well leave it. The DSA will pay it no heed. All it does is stop your previous instructor automatically getting a test booking in that same time slot. It just isn’t worth the hassle.

What will happen if I used the wrong ADI number when I booked my test?

Nothing. Don’t worry about it. On the off chance the examiner mentions it, just explain what happened. It has nothing to do with your actual test.

Clockwork Angels Set To Chart In Top 5

Clockwork Angels MerchandiseJust saw this news item on Planet Rock. It says that Rush’s new album Clockwork Angels is set to chart in the top 5, having sold nearly 100,000 copies in the US alone.

If it charts at #2, it’ll equal Counterparts’ debut position in 1993. Not bad for a bunch of old fogeys who’ve been at it for 40 years and still going strong!

I also got my Clockwork Angels t-shirts this morning from the Rush Backstage Club. All ready for next May!

It’s worth keeping an eye on Planet Rock because they’re playing some interviews and shows Geddy recorded when Darren Redick interviewed him a few weeks back. You can listen to most of the shows using the on-demand service.

Check out this Rolling Stone interview with Alex about the record and Rush at this time in their careers.

And also in Rolling Stone, this interview with Neil on the same subject.

EDIT 21/6/2012: Wow! It went in at Number 2!

Billboard 200 for Week Ending 30 June 2012

If You Find Driving Difficult, Blame Your Instructor…

That’s nonsense, of course, But it seems to be the favoured excuse of some learners when their mates are winding them up.

I was reading a forum where there are a lot of learners and people with immature attitudes hanging about, and someone was asking for opinions about whether they should change instructor. They write:

Had about 10-12 lessons and haven’t done all that much! Just mirror, signal, manoeuvre. Driving on main roads. Drove in 1,2,3,4 gear. Done mini roundabouts, hills, clutch control, but that’s about it.

Two of my friends started with the same instructor at the same time and they’ve done loads more, including parallel parking, turning around corners etc.

Every week they ask me what I’ve done and I always say nothing, which is starting to annoy me. I know I must be rubbish, but wondered if I should swap driving instructor because I don’t learn properly with this guy or something?

Oh and he’s always late, to me and my friends. But later with me. Been on time once. Latest was 40 minutes late.

The only part of that which is bad – assuming it’s true and not just an afterthought to imply blame – is the turning up late part. That’s just not on, especially if you’re paying for the lost time.

But 10-12 lessons, especially if they’re only one hour sessions, is not a lot. For many new drivers having covered all of that in the first paragraph in only 12 hours isn’t really that bad. My only comment is that I’d also have such a learner doing the manoeuvres by this stage.

As usual, some of the replies demonstrate an intelligence and level of immaturity which defies belief, but which is all too common in young people today:

I would definitely go with a different instructor if your doing less than your friends and he is turning up much later to your lessons, sounds like he thinks he can do whatever he likes, and it will only get worse.

This implies that everyone learns at the same rate. They don’t.

This one manages to plumb the depths of stupidity to new lows:

YES! You should totally change. I stuck with my instructor which was really dumb, it took me failing my test 4 times before I decided he had to go.

Also I was a really nervy driver, yet I drove at 60mph in 5th gear on an A road in my first lesson; sounds like he’s completely milking you, AND he’s late?! Bad, bad, bad!

Odd that it took four test failures to realise this, and even odder (not mention totally in contradiction to) what the same poster writes in reply to someone questioning the same thing:

Hey, I have nerves! I drove 250 miles with my Uncle totally fine three days before my last test. And I always come out with less than 8 minors, but I always make at least one serious mistake because I overthink everything.

So, this person can drive, but failing the test was their instructor’s fault? And they openly admit to being scared to even be in a car? And it’s funny how they are criticising their instructor for pushing them, when they’re accusing someone else’s instructor of “milking” them for allegedly not doing the same!

And as for “overthinking”… that is the bane of my life when I get pupils who do that, because it does hold them back. Often, the only way of dealing with it is driving time and experience-building – neither of which can be acquired overnight!

There are fast learners and slow learners in the world. If you’re one of the slow ones, you can’t really blame your instructor.

Project: Building A New PC

One of the most popular series of articles on this blog is the one where I detailed my DIY kneeling chair project. Other popular articles relate to some of the Computers & Tech posts – particularly ones which identify a problem or provide solutions. In fact, come to think about it the rest of the blog is most often found by people wanting answers to something.

I always build my own computers, and the one I’m using at the moment is a bit out of date. I built it back in 2009, and it was a fast machine then. However, I’m like every computer I have ever had, you start to notice that it isn’t as fast as the newer ones after a while. The old machine spec is as follows:

  • Windows 7 Ultimate 64-bit
  • Intel Core 2 Quad Q6600 CPU
  • Intel D975XBX2 motherboard
  • 4GB DDR2 RAM
  • nVidia GeForce 8800 GTS 320MB graphics card
  • 4 x Western Digital 500GB HDD
  • 2 x Optiarc DVD RW SATA drives
  • Sigmatel HD Audio 64-bit on motherboard

This is housed in a limited edition mirror-finish Japanese Steel Antec ATX case.

So, it’s time for a new one! And I’m going to detail the building of it on here.

First of all, there is nothing wrong with the case or the DVD units, so I am going to use those in my new one (as well as Windows 7). The spec for the new PC will be as follows (provisionally):

  • Intel Core i7 3770K CPU
  • ASUS P8Z77 motherboard
  • 16GB Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600MHz RAM
  • nVidia Gigabyte GTX 570 Windforce 3X 1280MB graphics card
  • 1 x OCZ 256GB Vertex 4 SATA III SSD
  • 3 x Seagate or Samsung 1TB HDDs
  • Realtek 8-channel HD Audio on motherboard

I say “provisionally” because the motherboard might yet change, as may the graphics card and specific SSD unit. But the core spec will remain the same.

The new machine will boot from a solid-state disk (SSD) and use standard HDDs for storage.

I will keep this thread updated as I put the device together. To be honest, once you have all the parts the actual construction only takes an hour or so – installing the OS and all your software is the hard part!

DSA Alert – DVLA Scam Warning

Apparently, an email is doing the rounds asking people to verify their driver’s licence details. It is a scam.

The email test is along the lines of:

From: DVLA
Subject: Update Your License Details

We are currrently [sic] upgrading our database and all drivers are required to update and verify there [sic] driver’s license details.To complete your license verification with us, you are required to fill out the form in the link below.

{Fake link}

Drivers that [sic] refuses to upgrade his or her details within two weeks of receiving this verification email will lose his or her driver’s License and will have to take a fresh driving test.

We sincerely apologise for any inconviniences [sic] this might have caused you.

Thank you for your co-operation.

(c) Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency Swansea SA6 7JL

Ignore it and bin it. Even clicking it to “have a look” could be risky, especially with the crap spelling and grammar in it, so you’ve been warned.

DSA Alert – New Penalties To Tackle Careless Driving

An email alert from the DSA following on from a consultation.

If approved, the proposals would allow the police to issue fixed penalty notices (FPNs) for careless driving, and avoid the need for the ridiculous amount of deskwork such charges currently involve, and which the police will obviously avoid pursuing unless it is a serious offence as a result.

I notice that it doesn’t appear to have gone down to well amongst that group of ADIs who think that only they are capable of making such assessments, and who are blaming it on the DSA – when in fact it is a government issue.

If slapped with such an FPN, there would be a £90 fine and three points on your licence. More serious cases would still go through the courts where higher penalties would most likely be imposed.

The proposals would also see current FPN charges increase from £60 to £90 (e.g. using mobile phones, not wearing seatbelts, speeding). There are other changes also being considered, which you can read in the full document.

The consultation is still open for people to contribute to.

DSA Advice: Fitness To Drive

Another email alert advising on driving when you’re unwell or have conditions which could affect your driving:

Rule 90

Make sure that you are fit to drive. You MUST report to the Driver and Vehicle Licensing Agency (DVLA) any health condition likely to affect your driving.

Use the medical A to Z to see if you need to tell the DVLA about your medical condition.

If a pupil gets into the car for a lesson and I sense that they’re unwell, and especially if they confirm that they are (colds, flu, etc.) then I won’t let them drive.

I’ve also had pupils who I’ve discovered are taking tablets that preclude them from driving (one only last week who’d been stricken with chest pains apparently brought on by stress, and the tablets said he shouldn’t drive).

DSA Advice: Driving In Wet Weather

Timely advice from the DSA about wet-weather driving:

Rule 227

In wet weather, stopping distances (PDF, 125KB) will be at least double those required for stopping on dry roads. This is because your tyres have less grip on the road.

In wet weather

  • you should keep well back from the vehicle in front. This will increase your ability to see and plan ahead
  • if the steering becomes unresponsive, it probably means that water is preventing the tyres from gripping the road. Ease off the accelerator and slow down gradually
  • the rain and spray from vehicles may make it difficult to see and be seen
  • be aware of the dangers of spilt diesel that will make the surface very slippery
  • take extra care around pedestrians, cyclists, motorcyclists and horse riders

Rule 121

Brakes affected by water. If you have driven through deep water your brakes may be less effective.

Test them at the first safe opportunity by pushing gently on the brake pedal to make sure that they work. If they are not fully effective, gently apply light pressure while driving slowly. This will help to dry them out.

With all the rain we’ve had, people really need to take notice of this advice.