Category - ADI

Idiot Driver Caught Eating Cereal Behind Wheel

Police in Edinburgh have launched an enquiry after a motorist was caught on camera eating a bowl of cereal while driving through the city centre. He was overtaking cyclists while he was doing it.

The car he’s driving looks like a Corsa, so I guess that puts it down to some sort of genetic problem.

The idiot deserves everything that is coming to him (assuming he gets caught). But it’s also worth pointing out that the video has been plastered all over the internet by the cyclist – called “Raging Bike” – who took it, along with various comments about the speed he was doing. I hope they had a calibrated speed gun in order to make the accusation about him exceeding 30mph (35mph is mooted).

Let’s also hope that the rightful prosecution of one blinkered idiot hasn’t been prejudiced by others.

If you Google “Raging Bike”, you’ll find that the person who crops up is not exactly pro-motorist. In fact, on one site where he is interviewed you get the impression that he is the character portrayed by Sylvester Stallone in the Rambo movies (particularly Rambo I and II) – except on a bike instead of an army truck or assault helicopter.

How To End A Career

This is a very old article.

The Suffolk Free Press reports that a driving instructor, Philip Devereux, was on a lesson with a pupil and the car was involved in a collision with another vehicle. When breathalysed, he was found to be almost twice the legal limit! The incident occurred on 5 October 2013.

He was banned for 12 months, and fined a total of just over £300.

The story doesn’t mention whether or not his ADI badge will be revoked or not (nor does it mention if anyone was injured). But going by the book, it probably will be. What a way to end your career.

Chinese Police Spark Sexism Outrage

This made me smile. You have to remember that the claims of sexism are from the West – China doesn’t see it that way.

Police in Beijing have put out a series of advisories for female drivers via China’s equivalent of Twitter.

Some women drivers lack a sense of direction and while driving a car they often hesitate and can’t decide which road to take… Once they realize their mistake, they cause accidents by spinning the steering wheel in a panic.

[women drivers] are not able to find the way to their destination, even if they’ve been there many times.

Women drivers tend to panic following an accident… They usually draw a complete mental blank, providing opportunities for criminals.

These are just three of the pieces of advice. As you might expect, China’s female population isn’t taking it lightly. One candidate for the Dippy Blond Awards has replied:

This is discrimination! Many male drivers are idiots, too.

Obviously, Chinese feminists are less skilled when challenging alleged sexism than their Western counterparts.

Apparently, this advice comes hot on the heels (no pun intended) where a recent accident occurred after a woman’s high heel got stuck. Mind you, China’s journalists (certainly, their cartoonists) are similarly naive.

Goodyear/RED Partnership

I’m not sure what the point of this is. The entire press release says:

Goodyear has announced a new partnership with RED Driving School, through which the tyre manufacturer will disseminate safety information to learner drivers via a new website and social media campaigns. The new collaboration will run alongside Goodyear’s existing national driving academy initiative in UK schools.

I’m sure someone somewhere will benefit, but I can’t work out who.

Saudi Arabia Ban On Women Drivers

About a month ago I mentioned the on-going ban on women drivers in Saudi Arabia, and some official over there had tried to argue that driving could harm a woman’s reproductive system and give rise to birth defects.

Well, it appears that the ban is not 100% supported by the Saudi male population, either. Comedian, Hisham Fageeh, has made a spoof video poking fun at the ridiculous claims and overall topic. It’s clever and funny, and to the tune of Bob Marley and the Wailers’ No Woman, No Cry.

Lesson: Don’t Argue With The Police

You’d think that being over the drink drive limit, having no licence, and no insurance would mean that you’d give the police a wide berth if you were driving past them.

Mind you, to get like that in the first place you’d probably have had a certain kind of upbringing – and therefore if you saw your father, for example, as you drove by, and noticed that he had been stopped by the police for some reason, then you might decide to go and poke your nose in and see if you could “help” (even though there is no recorded case of some caveman ever managing to successfully “help” another caveman when he has interfere with police business like this).

And this is what happened to Leon Fitzpatrick from Sunderland. He’d been on the booze the night before and as he was driving to work he saw that his father had been pulled over. Up to this point the police weren’t even aware of his existence. But then he decided to go and poke his nose in, and that was when the officers noticed the smell of alcohol on his breath. Naturally, routine checks then identified the breaches of licence conditions.

His defence lawyer was Anna Haq – a name which I recognise from a story not long ago, but which I haven’t bothered to look up. Her pathetic mitigating comments were:

He would never have been arrested if he had not got out of that vehicle, there was no evidence of bad driving.

Ah, well that’s OK then. He could have then just gone and driven through a school crossing and everything would have been fine.

He was banned for 14 months and fined a total of £215.

Sports Car Driver Kills Two

Darren Jarvis, 42, was allegedly showing off in his sports car (reg. plate WH06 BAD – with a screw in the ‘6’ to make it read “WHOS BAD”) when he lost control at 100mph. He careered into another car and killed two male occupants, both married and each with two children.

Jarvis denies two charges of causing death by dangerous driving. He is claiming he had some sort of seizure and that he was driving at less than 100mph.

As the court case continued, it appeared that Jarvis accelerated hard and managed to go round a bend before losing control. He was also seen trying to wrestle control back after he’d lost it (it must have been a very strange sort of seizure he had). However, a witness at the scene reckons he was shaking and “frothing at the mouth”. Jarvis claims he can’t remember anything.

EDIT: The case is still on-going. There are several further updates, and summing up has concluded.

EDIT: And Jarvis was found guilty. He faces hail when he is sentenced in November.

Reducing The Cost Of Motoring

This story has been covered in the press and in a DSA email alert, Apparently, the government (I’m not sure if they mean Mickey or Donald) has decided Government (coalition) headgear kitthat drivers need their help. According to The Mail, this means freezing the MoT charge until 2015, erecting signs along motorways to warn motorists of rip-off prices, and “reviewing” the cost of the driving test and provisional licence. Oh, and some stuff about stopping liars and lawyers cashing in on whiplash claims.

The one about road signs is already the only issue that matters as far as The Mail is concerned.

But in all honesty, it is just a joke. The MoT costs nearly £55, and if I remember correctly that went up from the previous price of £38 about four years ago. An MoT is only required for cars older than three years, and it has to be renewed annually after the first one, so if the price went up now it would only jump by £10-£20. That would equate to a massive additional outlay equivalent up to 5½ pence per day.

I think we’re all grateful to the government for freezing that one until 2015 (even though it will then go up by a larger amount to make up for lost time)!

Then there is the plan to erect illuminated price signs along the motorways so that you know how much it costs to fill up at the services en route.

Ministers hope it will highlight the sums being charged by some garages that believe they have a ‘captive market’, and encourage them to compete for custom.

So, these would be illuminated signs like the ones you get outside garages on non-motorway routes? Fantastic idea, and well worth the hundreds of A forecourt sign - non-motorwaythousands of pounds of MPs’ time which were no doubt required to come up with it!

Returning to Planet Earth, there is then the “review” of the cost of the driving test and a provisional licence. The test costs £62 at the moment, and somehow I can’t really imagine the price going down. Of course, a lot of instructors out there – especially the ones who have recently been trying to get into politics themselves – believe that the test is too expensive on the grounds that the hourly pro rata rate is more than instructors can command for lessons. Some will even go so far as to mention how the test only cost about £5 back in the 70s – even though £5 in 1970 would be worth £65.50 in 2013 money! Even after decimalisation the equivalent today would have been £35 or more. Therefore, the test has not gone up by that much.

But above all that, the structure of the part of government that manages tests is far too bureaucratic to justify being able to cut the price, and the only possible direction – apart from freezing it artificially – is upwards.

Oh yes. And the provisional licence costs £50. It is paid for once by 99% of the population.

If the idiots really wanted to cut costs for motorists they could do two things:

cut fuel duty

prosecute Nottingham City Council for commencing protracted simultaneous road works across the City

Women Better Than Men At Multitasking

This article from the BBC suggests that the long-held belief that women are better than men at multitasking was a “myth”. But it goes on to report that new research has shown that it’s true after all: women are better at it – in some things, at least..

Harley Quinn - female joker card imageIt’s funny, but I have never regarded it as a myth. I have always told my pupils that women are generally better than men at multitasking – but I’ve then explained precisely what is meant by “multitasking”, because that’s where the real confusion lies. The conversation usually comes about early on, perhaps when learning how to coordinate the pedals, or maybe when trying a manoeuvre like the turn in the road for the first time.

When you ask a pupil about multitasking, they’ve all heard of it, and they all know about the men vs. women thing. But almost all of them associate it with doing two or more things at the same time, and that’s definitely not what it is. You see, when they try a turn in the road for the first time they will often try to control the speed of the car and steer at the same time – with the net result that neither operation is completed properly. Or when it comes to stopping near the kerb they’ll be trying to steer, and brake, and watch the kerb all at the same time (incidentally, this is where hitting the gas pedal by mistake is most likely to occur) – again, none of these sub-tasks gets completed properly

The problem lies in the fact that no one can do two or more separate things simultaneously – that is, at exactly the same time. What they can do, however, is quickly switch between the individual sub-tasks which make up each overall task. So both tasks get completed by doing a bit of one, then a bit of the other, then the next bit of the first one… and so on. And it is here where women are generally – though not always – more adept than men. It’s also one reason why men and women can become frustrated with each other, when the man focuses on one task or conversation, whereas the woman jumps between them.

You can’t pigeonhole human behaviour as easily as all this, though – and definitely not when it comes to driving. In terms of spatial awareness, for example, men generally have the edge. Women generally have the edge when it comes to not having over-inflated egos, though. Every difference between the sexes is just a generality, and when you add them all up everything gets smoothed out and there’s not that much difference. However, as I mentioned in the Tears of a Clown article, some people have emotional jokers up their sleeves which often reinforces the stereotypical views.

Tears Of A Clown

The post about my most recent test pass got me thinking. You see, when you do this job you meet all kinds of people – and lots of them – so you build up Tears of a Clown by Victoria Frances Arta sort of statistical image of people in general. There is one small group that causes the most grief for me as an instructor, and it’s the one which has its emotions very near the surface and ready to bubble over at the slightest prompt.

This over-emotional group – however small it may be overall – does seem to consist mainly of… women. There, I’ve said it. And it’s simply a statement of fact.

Having said that, I do care what pupils think, and on the relatively rare occasions when one of them breaks down in tears I’m always worried that it might be due to something I’ve said or done. Of course, technically it always IS something I’ve said or done, because if they weren’t in the car with me in the first place then they probably wouldn’t be crying. But I’m a scientist, and I’m logical enough to be able to work out whether something really is my fault or not, so I don’t worry for too long over it.

In one extreme case some years ago I had a German pupil. Right from the start she came over as loud, confident, and full of herself. She didn’t like having any sort of fault pointed out at the best of times (when you get someone like that, you wonder why they’re paying for bloody lessons in the first place), but sometimes she’d get in the car and her eyes would already be red from crying. On those lessons she was a liability. She’d be flinging the car round corners without any thought for what might be coming the other way, and clutch control was out of the window. At these times you just couldn’t talk to her without her either getting angry or bursting into tears (sometimes both). I worked out that this happened every month – like clockwork.

Now, the $64,000 question is: what does an insignificant male do in these situations? It’s a complete no-win scenario when someone is so emotionally unstable, because if you bottle it and don’t pick up their faults they’ll accuse you of ripping them off, and if you do pick up their faults they’re in tears. If they leave you, you can bet your bottom dollar that their next instructor will be told that you were “always shouting at them”. A mere male doesn’t have the option to put his arms around someone (not without ending up on the front page of The Sun, anyway), and this is even less of an option when you’re dealing with someone who was probably a founder member of the militant wing of the Teutonic Women’s Liberation Front. You can’t “identify” the cause,  even though both of you know damned well what the cause is (that would get you on the TV as well as in the papers).

Men – especially driving instructors – are programmed to give advice whether people want it or not, whereas women are programmed to reject all advice by default, especially if it’s from a man. Women also have the additional option of tearing the man’s liver out if they’re in a bad mood over something when he offers his advice. I gather it’s got something to do with wanting “empathy”, but it’s bloody hard to sit there nodding empathetically when your life is flashing before your eyes as some maniac with messed up biochemistry is taking every corner on two wheels.

The famous statement that you can’t please all of the people all of the time was never more apt, and I’d go so far as to add that you can’t please some of the people any of the time.

The German woman was an extreme case, but pupils crying when they have made even the smallest mistake isn’t that uncommon. One recent pass of mine had a habit of doing it, even up to the last lesson before her test. With her, it was a fine balance between anger and tearfulness (it usually started with the tears, followed by the anger), but the problem was still as difficult to manage for me. I mean, what can you say or do? It was only on the way back from her test that she confessed that she cries whenever something goes wrong for her. Feeling on safer ground this time (she was, after all, holding her Pass Certificate and wearing a big shiny smile) I commented that whenever it happened I always got the impression that she was blaming me for something. I was slightly put out that she didn’t deny this as emphatically as I would have liked, but this defensiveness is another aspect of the problem.

Another example from several years ago involved a young girl. She was a great driver, but she was also a serial test failer (six times, and always for something different – in fact, she was the one whose mother said to her just before a test “now remember what we told you, Sarah: drive SLOWLY everywhere”, and within 2 minutes of us moving off she applied this when joining a busy dual carriageway). After each of her test fails the volume of tears she cried as she rested her head against the window all the way home must have rusted the door panels on my car.

A current pupil has her test coming up, and I have no real worries because she is also a good driver. However, a few days ago she made a couple of small mistakes during a manoeuvre and suddenly was in tears. As usual I felt terrible, but to be fair to her she was strangely upbeat about it (this is another thing the male of the species can’t understand: how the waterworks seem to be able to be turned on and off at will). We discussed it on the next lesson and she told me that a few days later her husband told her that the firemen dealing with the Australian bushfires had been feeding water to Koalas, which made her break down again! What the hell can you (as a man) do in situations like this?

I think that in many cases it has a lot to do with upbringing. Somehow, I can’t imagine that the typical Iron Age woman burst into tears over insignificant details – if she had, we’d all be extinct by now. The problem with many youngsters is that they’ve been mollycoddled for 17 years and they simply don’t know how to handle any sort of failure, however small it may be. With many of them, crying is a form of emotional blackmail that they’ve grown up using because – certainly with mummy and daddy – it has always paid dividends. In the adult world, though, it often doesn’t get them what they want.